Fit of biokinetic data in molecular radiotherapy: a machine learning approach

被引:0
|
作者
Ciucci, Davide [1 ]
Cassano, Bartolomeo [3 ]
Donatiello, Salvatore [1 ]
Martire, Federica [2 ]
Napolitano, Antonio [1 ]
Polito, Claudia [1 ]
Camillocci, Elena Solfaroli [1 ]
Cervino, Gianluca [4 ]
Pungitore, Ludovica [4 ]
Altini, Claudio [5 ]
Villani, Maria Felicia [5 ]
Pizzoferro, Milena [5 ]
Garganese, Maria Carmen [5 ]
Cannata, Vittorio [1 ]
机构
[1] Bambino Gesu Pediat Hosp, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Rome, Tor Vergata Postgrad Sch Med Phys, Rome, Italy
[3] IRCCS Regina Elena Natl Canc Inst, Med Phys Dept, Rome, Italy
[4] Roma 3 Univ Rome, Rome, Italy
[5] Bambino Gesu Pediat Hosp, IRCCS, Nucl Med Unit, Rome, Italy
关键词
Machine learning; Akaike information criterion; F-test; Fit function; Biokinetic curves; DOSIMETRY; SERIES;
D O I
10.1186/s40658-024-00623-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn literature are reported different analytical methods (AM) to choose the proper fit model and to fit data of the time-activity curve (TAC). On the other hand, Machine Learning algorithms (ML) are increasingly used for both classification and regression tasks. The aim of this work was to investigate the possibility of employing ML both to classify the most appropriate fit model and to predict the area under the curve (tau).MethodsTwo different ML systems have been developed for classifying the fit model and to predict the biokinetic parameters. The two systems were trained and tested with synthetic TACs simulating a whole-body Fraction Injected Activity for patients affected by metastatic Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, administered with [131I]I-NaI. Test performances, defined as classification accuracy (CA) and percentage difference between the actual and the estimated area under the curve (Delta tau), were compared with those obtained using AM varying the number of points (N) of the TACs. A comparison between AM and ML were performed using data of 20 real patients.ResultsAs N varies, CA remains constant for ML (about 98%), while it improves for F-test (from 62 to 92%) and AICc (from 50 to 92%), as N increases. With AM, Delta tau\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\Delta \tau$$\end{document} can reach down to - 67%, while using ML Delta tau\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\Delta \tau$$\end{document} ranges within +/- 25%. Using real TACs, there is a good agreement between tau obtained with ML system and AM.ConclusionsThe employing of ML systems may be feasible, having both a better classification and a better estimation of biokinetic parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Platform approach to data, machine learning, and software in chemistry
    Meredig, Bryce
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 257
  • [32] Learning EPON delay models from data: a machine learning approach
    Alberto Hernandez, Jose
    Ebrahimzadeh, Amin
    Maier, Martin
    Larrabeiti, David
    JOURNAL OF OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING, 2021, 13 (12) : 322 - 330
  • [33] Standardising Nomenclatures in Breast Radiotherapy Imaging Data using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Haidar, A.
    Field, M.
    Batumalai, V.
    Cloak, K.
    Al Mouiee, D.
    Chlap, P.
    Huang, X.
    Chin, V.
    Carolan, M.
    Sykes, J.
    Vinod, S.
    Delaney, G.
    Holloway, L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S1406 - S1407
  • [34] Inflammatory markers in breast cancer patients treated with radiotherapy: Machine Learning approach
    Rodriguez-Tomas, E.
    Baiges-Gaya, G.
    Acosta, J.
    Torres, L.
    Castane, H.
    Gomez, J.
    Arquez, M.
    Castano, F.
    Camps, J.
    Joven, J.
    Arenas, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S921 - S922
  • [35] A MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH TO COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN
    BOLIS, G
    DIPACE, L
    FABROCINI, F
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 1991, 5 (06) : 617 - 628
  • [36] A Machine Learning Approach to Model the Received Signal in Molecular Communications
    Yilmaz, H. Birkan
    Lee, Changmin
    Cho, Yae Jee
    Chae, Chan-Byoung
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL BLACK SEA CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING (BLACKSEACOM), 2017, : 52 - 56
  • [37] Machine Learning Methods for Small Data Challenges in Molecular Science
    Dou, Bozheng
    Zhu, Zailiang
    Merkurjev, Ekaterina
    Ke, Lu
    Chen, Long
    Jiang, Jian
    Zhu, Yueying
    Liu, Jie
    Zhang, Bengong
    Wei, Guo-Wei
    CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2023, 123 (13) : 8736 - 8780
  • [38] Standardizing Radiotherapy Structure Names with Multimodal Data: Deep Learning Approach
    Bose, P.
    Srinivasan, S.
    Turner, P.
    Sleeman, W.
    Palta, J.
    Kapoor, R.
    Ghosh, P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E654 - E654
  • [39] A review of machine learning in tumor radiotherapy
    Zhang, Junqian
    Zhang, Yuan
    Yin, Yong
    Zhu, Jian
    Li, Baosheng
    Shengwu Yixue Gongchengxue Zazhi/Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2019, 36 (05): : 879 - 884
  • [40] Similarity detection among data files - A machine learning approach
    Dash, M
    Liu, H
    1997 IEEE KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING EXCHANGE WORKSHOP, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 172 - 179