Can Environmental Regulation Improve Labor Allocation Efficiency? Evidence from China's New Environmental Protection Law

被引:0
|
作者
Gu, Ran [1 ]
He, Zenghua [2 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Xian 710100, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Econ, Chongqing 400067, Peoples R China
关键词
environmental regulation; labor allocation efficiency; China's New Environmental Protection Law (NEPL); job transition; regulatory cost; DIRECTED TECHNICAL CHANGE; AIR-POLLUTION; LIFE EXPECTANCY; PRODUCTIVITY; GROWTH; EMPLOYMENT; ECONOMY; IMPACT; JOBS;
D O I
10.3390/su15076058
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The environmental regulatory stringency and labor reallocation are two defining features in developing countries. This study empirically estimates the impact of environmental regulation on labor allocation efficiency. We adopt the implementation of New Environmental Protection Law (NEPL) as an exogenous shock on environmental regulation to carry out a quasi-natural experiment. We find that the increase in environmental regulatory stringency has a significant and positive impact on labor allocation efficiency. The impact is mainly driven by job transition from heavy polluting industries to non-heavy polluting industries. The heterogeneity analysis results show that NEPL promotes the allocation efficiency of economically developed cities, men, union members, and low- and middle-educated laborers. Our study provides empirical evidence for regionally differentiated environmental regulation policies.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does environmental information disclosure regulation improve environmental governance? Evidence from China
    Cheng, Bo
    Mao, Xinyang
    EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2024, 63
  • [32] The Effect of Labor Protection on Firms' Operational Efficiency: Evidence from China's Labor Contract Law Implementation
    Xue, Mei
    Zhou, Yu
    Liu, Zhouhao
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [33] What can the environmental rule of law do for environmental innovation? Evidence from environmental tribunals in China
    Zhou, Kuo
    Luo, Haotian
    Qu, Zhi
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2023, 189
  • [34] China's New Environmental Protection Law and Green Innovation: Evidence from Prefecture-Level Cities
    Chen, Wen
    Wu, Ying
    COMPLEXITY, 2021, 2021
  • [35] Government's awareness of Environmental protection and corporate green innovation: A natural experiment from the new environmental protection law in China
    Fang, Zhenming
    Kong, Xiaoran
    Sensoy, Ahmet
    Cui, Xin
    Cheng, Feiyang
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2021, 70 : 294 - 312
  • [36] Can ESG investments and new environmental law improve social happiness in China?
    Lu, Peiyao
    Hamori, Shigeyuki
    Tian, Shuairu
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [37] Can Environmental Regulation Reduce Labor Costs and Improve Business Performance? Evidence From the Air Quality Index
    Chai, Kuang-Cheng
    Huang, Yang
    Chang, Ke-Chiun
    Hu, Wen-Jun
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 7
  • [38] Does environmental regulation improve residents' health? Evidence from China
    Pei, Yunhe
    Chen, Hailin
    Liu, Zhenhai
    Hu, Haozhi
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [39] The effectiveness of environmental authoritarianism: Evidence from China's administrative inquiry for environmental protection
    Nie, Yongyou
    Cheng, Dandan
    Liu, Kui
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 88
  • [40] The Government's Environmental Attention and the Sustainability of Environmental Protection Expenditure: Evidence from China
    Sun, Jing
    Hu, Jienan
    Wang, Hongmei
    Shi, Yinfeng
    Wei, Ziru
    Cao, Tangzhe
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (14)