Different Dosage Regimens of Tanezumab for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:1
|
作者
Lian, Jinrong [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jiahe [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiang [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Siyuan [1 ,2 ]
Li, Hang [1 ,2 ]
Zhong, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Heng [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Gang [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Affiliated Hosp 1, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Brain & Nerve Res Lab, Affiliated Hosp 1, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Southeast Univ, Affiliated Jiangyin Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Southeast Univ, Affiliated Jiangyin Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, 3 Yingrui Rd, Jiangyin 214400, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[5] Soochow Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Affiliated Hosp 1, 188 Shizi St, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[6] Soochow Univ, Brain & Nerve Res Lab, Affiliated Hosp 1, 188 Shizi St, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
tanezumab; chronic low back pain; dosage regimen; meta-analysis; NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; DOUBLE-BLIND; PHASE-III; OSTEOARTHRITIS; SAFETY; EFFICACY; KNEE; HIP; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/WNF.0000000000000530
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of different dosage regimens of tanezumab among individuals living with chronic low back pain (CLBP).MethodsPubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other databases were searched from inception until August 2021. Randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy and safety of tanezumab in individuals with CLBP were included. Data were extracted independently by 2 investigators and assessed the study quality by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The measurements include low back pain intensity and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. The incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events was set to assess the safety of tanezumab for CLBP.Results and DiscussionThree high-quality randomized controlled trials with 3414 patients were finally included in our analysis. Tanezumab, respectively, led to a notable decrease compared with placebo in low back pain intensity (mean difference, -0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.77 to -0.46; P < 0.01) and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (mean difference, -0.64; 95% CI, -0.80 to -0.47; P = 0.01). In addition, no significant difference existed between tanezumab and placebo groups (risk ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.81-1.49; P = 0.55) in the adverse events and (risk ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.34-3.27; P = 0.93) serious adverse events.ConclusionsIntravenous and subcutaneous tanezumab injections as treatment for improving CLBP have promising clinical application as its great improvement on all efficacy and its controllable safety issues. Furthermore, intravenous and subcutaneous tanezumab injections were proved to achieve excellent and long-term curative effect on CLBP through our subgroup analysis and comparison.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 16
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Exercise for the prevention of low back and pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Shiri, R.
    Coggon, D.
    Falah-Hassani, K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2018, 22 (01) : 19 - 27
  • [32] The effect of cupping therapy for low back pain: A meta-analysis based on existing randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Yun-Ting
    Qi, Yong
    Tang, Fu-Yong
    Li, Fei-Meng
    Li, Qi-Huo
    Xu, Chang-Peng
    Xie, Guo-Ping
    Sun, Hong-Tao
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 30 (06) : 1187 - 1195
  • [33] The effects of shoes and insoles for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Kong, Lingjun
    Zhou, Xin
    Huang, Qian
    Zhu, Qingguang
    Zheng, Yu
    Tang, Cheng
    Li, Jing Xian
    Fang, Min
    RESEARCH IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 28 (04) : 572 - 587
  • [34] Gabapentinoids for chronic low back pain: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Shanthanna, Harsha
    Gilron, Ian
    Thabane, Lehana
    Devereaux, Philip J.
    Bhandari, Mohit
    AlAmri, Rizq
    Rajarathinam, Manikandan
    Kamath, Sriganesh
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (11):
  • [35] Comparison of Different Treatment Regimens of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Chronic Low-back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sun, Haolin
    Chen, Hao
    Mu, Guanzhang
    Fu, Haoyong
    Yue, Lei
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2022, 25 (08) : E1211 - +
  • [36] Ozone Therapy as a Treatment for Low Back Pain Secondary to Herniated Disc: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    De Oliveira Magalhaes, Francisco N.
    Dotta, Luciana
    Sasse, Andre
    Teixeira, Manoel J.
    Fonoff, Erich T.
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2012, 15 (02) : E115 - E129
  • [37] Efficacy and safety of tanezumab in the treatment of chronic low back pain
    Katz, Nathaniel
    Borenstein, David G.
    Birbara, Charles
    Bramson, Candace
    Nemeth, Mary Anne
    Smith, Mike D.
    Brown, Mark T.
    PAIN, 2011, 152 (10) : 2248 - 2258
  • [38] Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing fusion surgery to non-surgical treatment for discogenic chronic low back pain
    Wang, Xin
    Wanyan, Pingping
    Tian, Jin Hui
    Hu, Long
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2015, 28 (04) : 621 - 627
  • [39] Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain in Long-Term Follow-Up: A Meta-Analysis of 13 Randomized Controlled Trials
    Xu, Mai
    Yan, Shi
    Yin, Xu
    Li, Xiuyang
    Gao, Shuguang
    Han, Rui
    Wei, Licheng
    Luo, Wei
    Lei, Guanghua
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (01): : 1 - 19
  • [40] Placebo Response among Different Types of Sham Acupuncture for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Xiong, Zhi-yi
    Liu, Xiao-yu
    Ma, Pei-hong
    Sun, Chong-yang
    Sun, Cheng-yi
    Liu, Ting-lan
    Liu, Bao-yan
    Liu, Cun-zhi
    Yan, Shi-yan
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 29 (10) : 941 - 950