Emerging arguments for reproductive technologies in wildlife and their implications for assisted reproduction and conservation of threatened marsupials

被引:0
|
作者
Howell, Lachlan G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Witt, Ryan R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Sch Environm & Life Sci, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ Geelong, Ctr Integrat Ecol, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Melbourne Burwood Campus,221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia
[3] FAUNA Res Alliance, Kahibah, NSW 2290, Australia
关键词
Assisted reproductive technology; Cryopreservation; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Koala; Research funding; Wildlife; KOALA PHASCOLARCTOS-CINEREUS; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; WOMBAT VOMBATUS-URSINUS; IN-VITRO MATURATION; BLACK-FOOTED FERRET; TAMMAR WALLABY; ESTROUS-CYCLE; ARTIFICIAL-INSEMINATION; BRUSHTAIL POSSUM; TRICHOSURUS-VULPECULA;
D O I
10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.12.008
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) have significant potential to make a meaningful contribution to the conservation of threatened wildlife. This is true of Australia's iconic, and endangered koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). If developed, ARTs could offer a solution to manage genetic diversity and costs in breeding programs and may provide frozen repositories for either insurance or the practical production of genetically resilient koalas for release and on-ground recovery. Holding back the wider use of ARTs for koalas and other wildlife is a lack of funding to close the remaining knowledge gaps in the marsupial reproductive sciences and develop the reproductive tools needed. This lack of funding is arguably driven by a poor understanding of the potential contribution ARTs could make to threatened species man-agement. We present a review of our cross-disciplinary and accessible strategy to draw much needed public attention and funding for the development of ARTs in wildlife, using emerging cost and genetic modelling arguments and the koala as a case study. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 29
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implications of Epigenetics and Genomic Imprinting in Assisted Reproductive Technologies
    Laprise, Shari L.
    MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 76 (11) : 1006 - 1018
  • [22] Implications of Assisted Reproductive Technologies for Pregnancy Outcomes in Mammals
    Hansen, Peter J.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANIMAL BIOSCIENCES, VOL 8, 2020, 2020, 8 : 395 - 413
  • [23] Contribution of animal models to the study of reproduction, assisted reproductive technologies and of development
    Jammes, Helene
    Fauque, Patricia
    Jouannet, Pierre
    BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2010, 194 (02): : 301 - 317
  • [24] Borderlands of reproduction: bodies, borders, and assisted reproductive technologies in Israel/Palestine
    Rexer, Gala
    ETHNIC AND RACIAL STUDIES, 2021, 44 (09) : 1549 - 1568
  • [25] Policy recommendations for queer and trans reproduction with Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Europe
    Leibetseder, D.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 34 : 297 - 297
  • [26] Reproduction inside/outside: Medical imaging and the domestication of assisted reproductive technologies
    Lie, Merete
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WOMENS STUDIES, 2015, 22 (01) : 53 - 69
  • [27] Progesterone Hypersensitivity in Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Implications for Safety and Efficacy
    Sandru, Florica
    Dumitrascu, Mihai Cristian
    Petca, Aida
    Petca, Razvan-Cosmin
    Roman, Alexandra-Maria
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [28] Mullerian malformations in an Assisted Reproductive Technologies Center: clinical implications
    Lima, T.
    Cardoso, A. S.
    Sa, M. I.
    Pinto, A.
    Leal, C.
    Fraga, S.
    Lourenco, C.
    Barreiro, M.
    Pereira, I. Sousa
    Guimaraes, J. Mesquita
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 : 297 - 297
  • [29] Assisted Reproductive Technologies and World Religions: Implications for Couples Therapy
    Connor, Jennifer
    Sauer, Clint
    Doll, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2012, 23 (02) : 83 - 98
  • [30] SEX-SELECTED MULTIPARITY: A MODEL-ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR WILDLIFE CONSERVATION
    Romo, S.
    Ordonez Leon, E. A.
    Pena Verduzco, M.
    Lopez, B. B.
    Esperon, S. A. E.
    Moreno, J. F.
    Kjelland, M. E.
    REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 25 (01) : 285 - 286