Agricultural Land Market in Ukraine: Challenges of Trade Liberalization and Future Land Policy Reforms

被引:0
|
作者
Ibatullin, Shamil [1 ,2 ]
Dorosh, Yosyp [1 ]
Sakal, Oksana [1 ,2 ]
Krupin, Vitaliy [2 ]
Kharytonenko, Roman [1 ]
Bratinova, Maria [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Acad Agr Sci Ukraine, Land Management Inst, UA-03022 Kiev, Ukraine
[2] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Rural & Agr Dev, PL-00330 Warsaw, Poland
[3] Natl Univ Life & Environm Sci Ukraine, UA-03041 Kiev, Ukraine
关键词
land ownership; property; normative monetary value of land; land price; land plot; land policy; human rights; rural development; monitoring; data quality;
D O I
10.3390/land13030338
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
After over 20 years of a strict moratorium on the turnover of agricultural land in Ukraine, an official market for this type of land has recently been established. The purpose of this study was to examine the functioning of the fundamental elements of this market from the moment of its introduction on 1 July 2021 until today, as well as to understand the possible directions for its further development. The analysis of the agricultural land market and the visualization of the obtained results were carried out using the PostgreSQL database, Python and SQL programming languages, and the QGIS and Metabase tools. It was found that the volume of the agricultural land market remains insignificant, as the total area of sold land during this period made up only 0.7% of the arable land area of Ukraine. Prices for land plots remained at the level of their normative monetary value and are still relatively low, which indicates the significant undercapitalization of agricultural land as a production factor. The stability of agricultural land prices under the influence of various factors also indicates their relative virtuality, which, taking into account the further lifting of restrictions on the size of land plots to be sold as of 1 January 2024, requires the use of appropriate land policy instruments in order to fully utilize the multipurpose role of land in the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals, which should be based on a human-rights-based approach to rural development, food security, and land policy.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Political Liberalization and Agricultural Trade Policy in Indonesia and the Philippines
    Laiprakobsup, Thanapan
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 22 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [22] Capacity building in land management - Implementing land policy reforms in Malawi
    Enemark, S
    Ahene, R
    SURVEY REVIEW, 2003, 37 (287) : 20 - 30
  • [23] Land Strategies and Livelihood Dynamics in Peri-urban Communities: Challenges to Land and Agricultural Policy in Lesotho
    Thebe, Vusilizwe
    Rakotje, Mapepe F.
    AFRICAN STUDIES, 2013, 72 (03) : 399 - 415
  • [24] Land market and agricultural land use after the EU enlargement
    Buday, Stefan
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA, 2007, 53 (04): : 145 - 145
  • [25] Land Consolidation and Its Effects on Afforested Agricultural Land: A Case Study of Ukraine
    Malashevskyi, Mykola
    Kishchak, Olena
    Malashevska, Olena
    Kishchak, Yuriy
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (04)
  • [26] LAND MARKET: REALITIES OF UKRAINE AND EXPERIENCE OF POLAND
    Gutsalenko, L. V.
    Dibrova, A. D.
    Koval, N. I.
    Tsaruk, N. G.
    ACADEMY REVIEW, 2024, (01): : 232 - 246
  • [27] Land Market of Ukraine: Problems of Legislative Regulation
    Zemko, Alla
    Bukanov, Hryhorii
    Zadorozhnia, Halyna
    Vinyukova, Olha
    Yefimenko, Kristina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 2021, 21 (12): : 459 - 462
  • [28] Transformation of Land Relations in Ukraine to Market Conditions
    Shulga, Mykhaylo
    Yurkov, Marko
    PRECEDENTE, 2023, 22 : 97 - 114
  • [29] The transactions in the agricultural land market in Slovakia
    Buday, Stefan
    Cicova, Tatiana
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA, 2014, 60 (10): : 449 - 457
  • [30] Segmenting the market for agricultural land in the Netherlands
    Segeren, A
    Luijt, J
    TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR ECONOMISCHE EN SOCIALE GEOGRAFIE, 2002, 93 (05) : 570 - 575