Ornamental Rhizoma Peanut: Perceptions and Use by Florida Consumers

被引:0
|
作者
Thomas, Kelly M. [1 ]
Blount, Ann R. [1 ]
Knox, Gary W. [2 ]
Mackowiak, Cheryl L. [3 ]
Sollenberger, Lynn E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Inst Food & Agr Sci, North Florida Res & Educ Ctr, Agron Dept, 155 Res Rd, Quincy, FL 32351 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Inst Food & Agr Sci, North Florida Res & Educ Ctr, Environm Hort Dept, 155 Res Rd, Quincy, FL 32351 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Inst Food & Agr Sci, North Florida Res & Educ Ctr, Dept Soil Water & Ecosyst Sci, 155 Res Rd, Quincy, FL 32351 USA
[4] Univ Florida, Agron Dept, McCarty Hall B, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
Arachis glabrata; drought-tolerant plant; legume; turfgrass alternative; urban and residential landscaping; MULTIPLE COMPARISONS; REGISTRATION; PERSISTENCE; CRITERION;
D O I
10.21273/HORTSCI17254-23
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Ornamental rhizoma peanut (Arachis glabrata Benth.; ORP) is a low-maintenance groundcover for use in urban and residential landscapes. Despite its availability since 2002, consumer insights on ORP have never been assessed. Online surveys are readily accepted by academic researchers as a valuable research tool. An online survey was distributed to 5820 Floridians with the objective to assess the use and perceptions of ORP by consumers. A total of 907 survey responses were received. Most respondents identified themselves as home gardeners (89%), white (93%), female (75%), and over age 65 (60%). Out of several turfgrass alternative benefits, respondents most valued reducing herbicide/pesticide and fertilizer/water usage and preventing weed establishment (X-2 = 204, df = 6, P < 0.001). The ORP selection purchased by respondents was predominately unknown. Most preferred ORP to flower heavily and frequently and maintain a canopy height below 20 cm in the landscape with infrequent mowing. Survey data show there is a potentially large consumer demand for ORP in Florida, but product availability, branding, and consumer access and engagement with information sources require additional focus in the coming years.
引用
收藏
页码:1178 / 1182
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Photoperiod sensitivity of rhizoma peanut germplasm
    Williams, M. J.
    Sinclair, T. R.
    Mislevy, P.
    Quesenberry, K. H.
    Blount, A. S.
    Coleman, S. W.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2008, 100 (05) : 1366 - 1370
  • [12] NITROGEN LIMITATION OF RHIZOMA PEANUT GROWTH
    Cathey, Sarah E.
    Sinclair, Thomas R.
    Mackowiak, Cheryl L.
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2013, 36 (02) : 311 - 328
  • [13] Genetic Variability of Cultivated Rhizoma Peanut
    Maas, Andrea L.
    Anderson, William F.
    Quesenberry, Kenneth H.
    CROP SCIENCE, 2010, 50 (05) : 1908 - 1914
  • [14] No-till establishment of rhizoma peanut
    Williams, MJ
    Valencia, E
    Sollenberger, LE
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2002, 94 (06) : 1350 - 1354
  • [15] EFFECT OF CUTTING INTERVAL UPON YIELD, COMPOSITION AND DIGESTIBILITY OF FLORIDA-77 ALFALFA AND FLORIGRAZE RHIZOMA PEANUT
    ROMERO, F
    VANHORN, HH
    PRINE, GM
    FRENCH, EC
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1987, 65 (03) : 786 - 796
  • [16] CONSUMERS PERCEPTIONS OF PRODUCT-USE SITUATION
    FENNELL, G
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1978, 42 (02) : 38 - 47
  • [17] Establishing rhizoma peanut-bahiagrass mixtures
    Shepard, Erin M.
    Sollenberger, Lynn E.
    Kohmann, Marta M.
    da Silva, Liliane Severino
    Harling, John F., Jr.
    Dubeux, Jose C. B., Jr.
    Vendramini, Joao M. B.
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 5 (03)
  • [18] FLORIGRAZE RHIZOMA PEANUT - A PERENNIAL FORAGE LEGUME
    PRINE, GM
    DUNAVIN, LS
    MOORE, JE
    ROUSH, RD
    FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION CIRCULAR, 1981, (NS-27): : 1 - 22
  • [19] Tolerance of rhizoma perennial peanut to glyphosate and triclopyr
    Martin, Logan J.
    Sellers, Brent A.
    Devkota, Pratap
    Ferrell, Jason A.
    Leon, Ramon G.
    Vendramini, Joao M. B.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (04) : 525 - 531
  • [20] SCREENING RHIZOMA PEANUT FOR ADAPTATION TO CALCAREOUS SOILS
    REED, RL
    OCUMPAUGH, WR
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 1991, 14 (02) : 163 - 174