Provision of Medications for Self-Managed Abortion Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision

被引:12
|
作者
Aiken, Abigail R. A. [1 ]
Wells, Elisa S. [2 ]
Gomperts, Rebecca [3 ]
Scott, James G. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, LBJ Sch Publ Affairs, POB Y, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Natl Womens Hlth Network, Plan C, Washington, DC USA
[3] Aid Access, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Texas Austin, McCombs Sch Business, Austin, TX 78712 USA
来源
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
TELEMEDICINE; MISOPROSTOL; MIFEPRISTONE; PREGNANCY; SAFE;
D O I
10.1001/jama.2024.4266
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ImportanceThe Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned the right to choose abortion in the US, with at least 16 states subsequently implementing abortion bans or 6-week gestational limits. Prior research indicates that in the 6 months following Dobbs, approximately 32 360 fewer abortions were provided within the US formal health care setting. However, trends in the provision of medications for self-managed abortion outside the formal health care setting have not been studied. ObjectiveTo determine whether the provision of medications for self-managed abortion outside the formal health care setting increased in the 6 months after Dobbs. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsCross-sectional study using data from sources that provided abortion medications outside the formal health care setting to people in the US between March 1 and December 31, 2022, including online telemedicine organizations, community networks, and online vendors. Using a hierarchical bayesian model, we imputed missing values from sources not providing data. We estimated the change in provision of medications for self-managed abortion after the Dobbs decision. We then estimated actual use of these medications by accounting for the possibility that not all provided medications are used by recipients. ExposureAbortion restrictions following the Dobbs decision. Main Outcomes and MeasuresProvision and use of medications for a self-managed abortion. ResultsIn the 6-month post-Dobbs period (July 1 to December 31, 2022), the total number of provisions of medications for self-managed abortion increased by 27 838 (95% credible interval [CrI], 26 374-29 175) vs what would have been expected based on pre-Dobbs levels. Excluding imputed data changes the results only slightly (27 145; 95% CrI, 25 747-28 246). Accounting for nonuse of medications, actual self-managed medication abortions increased by an estimated 26 055 (95% CrI, 24 739-27 245) vs what would have been expected had the Dobbs decision not occurred. Conclusions and RelevanceProvision of medications for self-managed abortions increased in the 6 months following the Dobbs decision. Results suggest that a substantial number of abortion seekers accessed services despite the implementation of state-level bans and restrictions.
引用
收藏
页码:1558 / 1564
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Longitudinal Impact of Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization on Abortion Service Delivery in Ohio, 2022-2023
    Smith, Mikaela H.
    McGowan, Michelle L.
    Kerestes, Courtney
    Bessett, Danielle
    Norris, Alison H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 114 (10) : 1034 - 1042
  • [32] VIEWPOINTS OF PATIENTS REGARDING THEIR REASONS FOR UNDERGOING A VASECTOMY: IMPACT OF THE DOBBS V JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION DECISION
    Wong, Vivian
    Posid, Tasha
    Shreram, Unni
    Asif, Hafsa
    Sweigert, Sarah
    DeLancey, John O.
    Springer, Eric
    Yih, Jessica
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E819 - E819
  • [33] Effects of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision on Obstetrics and Gynecology Graduating Residents' Practice Plans
    Woodcock, Alexandra L.
    Carter, Gentry
    Baayd, Jami
    Turok, David K.
    Turk, Jema
    Sanders, Jessica N.
    Pangasa, Misha
    Gawron, Lori M.
    Kaiser, Jennifer E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 142 (05): : 1105 - 1111
  • [34] Society for Medical Anthropology Statement on Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision
    Buchbinder, Mara
    Mishtal, Joanna
    Singer, Elyse O.
    Wendland, Claire L.
    MEDICAL ANTHROPOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2022, 36 (04) : 433 - 441
  • [35] Perceptions of abortion access across the United States prior to the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision: Results from a national survey
    Crawford, Brandon L.
    Simmons, Megan K.
    Turner, Ronna C.
    Lo, Wen-Juo
    Jozkowski, Kristen N.
    PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2023, 55 (03) : 153 - 164
  • [36] Marketing and Public Policy Implications of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
    Fitzgerald, M. Paula
    Langenderfer, Jeff
    Renzelli-Cain, Roberta
    Critch, Elizabeth A.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY & MARKETING, 2023, 42 (04) : 303 - 325
  • [37] ORIGINALISM AND THEORY OF THE CONSTITUTION: A CRITIQUE TO DOBBS V. JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION
    Caruso, Corrado
    BIOLAW JOURNAL-RIVISTA DI BIODIRITTO, 2023, (01): : 87 - 103
  • [38] The unrecognized vulnerability to the practice of allergy posed by Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization
    Greenhawt, Matthew
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 129 (06) : 653 - 654
  • [39] THE ELEVATION OF REALITY OVER RESTRAINT IN DOBBS V. JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION
    Walsh, Kevin C.
    HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2023, 46 : 915 - 935
  • [40] Impact of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization on Professional Decision-Making among Urology Applicants
    Velez, Danielle
    Seideman, Casey A.
    UROLOGY, 2024, 187 : 57 - 57