Inherent Attitudes or Misplaced Policies? Explaining COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Romania

被引:0
|
作者
Toro, Tibor [1 ]
Szekely, Istvan Gergo [2 ]
Kiss, Tamas [2 ]
Geambasu, Reka [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sapientia Hungarian Univ Transylvania, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[2] Romanian Inst Res Natl Minor, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[3] Babes Bolyai Univ, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[4] HUN REN Ctr Econ & Reg Stud, Budapest, Hungary
关键词
COVID-19; vaccine hesitancy; health policies; trust; conspiracy theories; Romania; CONSPIRACY BELIEFS; TRUST;
D O I
10.1177/08883254231198886
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
hesitancy toward COVID-19 vaccines was not particularly high in Romania at the beginning of the vaccination campaign. Nevertheless, the country became one of the laggards in the European Union in terms of vaccination rates. We aim to provide an empirical explanation for this phenomenon based on a representative survey conducted in November-December 2021. We test the influence of various factors on vaccine hesitancy, such as personal experiences with the disease, trust in relevant institutions, general worldviews, and the contact with certain institutions, such as the Romanian Orthodox Church, and general practitioners. Furthermore, we find that three COVID-specific cognitive factors played a crucial role in this respect, namely the evaluation of anti-COVID state measures, belief in COVID-related conspiracy theories, and, especially, fears of negative effects of COVID-19 vaccines. The high explanatory power of these three factors also shows that low vaccination rates were not inevitable consequences of some "inherent" attitudinal characteristics widespread in the Romanian society; on the contrary, vaccine hesitancy has developed as an unfortunate side effect of weak crisis management, as the government and relevant state institutions failed to properly utilize key organizational resources, such as the national network of general practitioners, and proved to be unable to dissipate fears and countervail the spread of conspiracy theories, while emergency measures did not resonate enough among the Romanian public.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Misinformation and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy
    Zimmerman, Tara
    Shiroma, Kristina
    Fleischmann, Kenneth R.
    Xie, Bo
    Jia, Chenyan
    Verma, Nitin
    Lee, Min Kyung
    VACCINE, 2023, 41 (01) : 136 - 144
  • [22] Addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy
    Mungmunpuntipantip, Rujittika
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2022, 18 (06)
  • [23] Pediatric Vaccine Hesitancy and COVID-19
    Morgans, Heather A.
    Schuster, Jennifer E.
    Warady, Bradley A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2023, 81 (01) : 13 - 14
  • [24] Trust and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy
    Carrieri, Vincenzo
    Guthmuller, Sophie
    Wuebker, Ansgar
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [25] Trust and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy
    Vincenzo Carrieri
    Sophie Guthmuller
    Ansgar Wübker
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [26] Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy
    Machingaidze, Shingai
    Wiysonge, Charles Shey
    NATURE MEDICINE, 2021, 27 (08) : 1338 - 1339
  • [27] Vaccine hesitancy in the COVID-19 era
    Adhikari, Bipin
    Cheah, Phaik Yeong
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 21 (08): : 1086 - 1086
  • [28] COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Fertility
    Kocak, Elif Nur
    cetinavci, Dilan
    Yuce, Servet
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH AND REPRODUCTION SCIENCES, 2022, 10 (02): : 117 - 118
  • [29] Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19
    Troiano, G.
    Nardi, A.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 194 : 245 - 251
  • [30] COVID-19 Parental Vaccine Hesitancy in Romania: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study
    Manolescu, Loredana Sabina Cornelia
    Zaharia, Corneliu Nicolae
    Dumitrescu, Anca Irina
    Prasacu, Irina
    Radu, Mihaela Corina
    Boeru, Adrian Calin
    Boidache, Liliana
    Nita, Irina
    Necsulescu, Andrei
    Medar, Cosmin
    Cristache, Corina Marilena
    Chivu, Razvan Daniel
    VACCINES, 2022, 10 (04)