Government innovation preferences, institutional fragility, and digital economic development

被引:4
|
作者
Ye, Muqing [1 ]
Zeng, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci Wuhan, Coll Publ Adm, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
关键词
Government innovation preferences; Institutional fragility; Digital economy; Moderating effects; PRODUCTS; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2023.12.023
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Institutional fragility is an important factor influencing government innovation preferences and driving the development of the digital economy. This study incorporates institutional fragility into the effectiveness of government innovation preferences in driving the digital economy's development. Based on panel data from 30 provinces and regions in China from 2013 to 2021, a "vertical-horizontal" hierarchy method is used to assess the level of digital economic development. A fixed-effects model is applied to examine the impact and transmission mechanism of government innovation preferences on the digital economy. The study also analyzes the moderating effect of institutional fragility and threshold effects. The results are as follows: (1) Digital economic development exhibits an "East high-West low" development pattern, with the boundary line becoming more distinct over time. (2) Government innovation preferences significantly positively influence digital economic development, with a more pronounced effect in the western regions. Overall, a 1 % increase in government innovation preferences results in an average 2.041 % increase in digital economic development, with regional innovation capacity playing a partial mediating role. (3) Institutional fragility negatively moderates the effect of government innovation preferences on the digital economy, and there is a dual-threshold effect. As institutional fragility eases, the driving force of government innovation preferences shows a stepwise upward trend.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 555
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The role of government in East Asian economic development: Comparative institutional analysis.
    Ozawa, T
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN STUDIES, 1999, 58 (02): : 453 - 454
  • [22] Digital Government Construction and Provincial Green Innovation Efficiency: Empirical Analysis Based on Institutional Environment in China
    Li, Jinjie
    Lou, Wenlong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (22)
  • [23] THE COMPOSITION OF GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE: ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND PREFERENCES
    Creedy, John
    Li, Shuyun May
    Moslehi, Solmaz
    ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2011, 49 (01) : 94 - 107
  • [24] Economic performance, government size, and institutional quality
    António Afonso
    João Tovar Jalles
    Empirica, 2016, 43 : 83 - 109
  • [25] Public preferences for government supply of public open space: A neo-institutional economic and lifecycle governance perspective
    Wang, Anqi
    Ho, Daniel Chi Wing
    Lai, Lawrence Wai Chung
    Chau, Kwong Wing
    CITIES, 2023, 141
  • [26] Economic performance, government size, and institutional quality
    Afonso, Antonio
    Jalles, Joao Tovar
    EMPIRICA, 2016, 43 (01) : 83 - 109
  • [27] COMMUNICATION OF SCIENCE AND INNOVATION IN THE INSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN CUBA
    Rodriguez, Anicel Garcia
    Rabelo, Noemi Rizo
    Lorenzo, Marianela Davila
    REVISTA UNIVERSIDAD Y SOCIEDAD, 2024, 16 (03): : 396 - 405
  • [28] Digital economy, green innovation and high-quality economic development
    Chen, Zhiang
    Xing, Ruikun
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2025, 99
  • [29] LOCAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES, INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY AND THE INCLUSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INDEX (IEDI) IN INDONESIA
    Mardiyani, Baiq Yeyen
    Budiono, Budiono
    Hidayai, Achmad Kemal
    CORVINUS JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIAL POLICY, 2023, 14 (02) : 127 - 144
  • [30] The institutional impact on the digital platform ecosystem and innovation
    Ochinanwata, Chinedu
    Igwe, Paul Agu
    Radicic, Dragana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL BEHAVIOR & RESEARCH, 2024, 30 (2/3): : 687 - 708