Implementation of Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Prevention With a Polygenic Risk Score Test in Clinical Practice

被引:1
|
作者
Padrik, Peeter [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Puustusmaa, Mikk [1 ]
Tonisson, Neeme [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Kolk, Berit [1 ]
Saar, Regina [1 ]
Padrik, Anna [1 ]
Tasa, Tonis [1 ]
机构
[1] OU Antegenes, Tartu, Estonia
[2] Tartu Univ Hosp, Clin Hematol & Oncol, Tartu, Estonia
[3] Univ Tartu, Inst Genom, Tartu, Estonia
[4] Tartu Univ Hosp, Genet & Personalized Med Clin, Tartu, Estonia
[5] OU Antegenes, Raatuse 21, EE-50603 Tartu, Estonia
来源
BREAST CANCER-BASIC AND CLINICAL RESEARCH | 2023年 / 17卷
关键词
breast cancer; polygenic risk score; screening; personalized prevention; genetic predisposition; BENEFITS; PREDICTION; HARMS;
D O I
10.1177/11782234231205700
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Breast cancer (BC) screening with mammography reduces mortality but considers currently only age as a risk factor. Personalized risk-based screening has been proposed as a more efficient alternative. For that, risk prediction tools are necessary. Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous genetic variants (single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]) associated with BC. The effects of SNPs are combined into a polygenic risk score (PRS) as a risk prediction tool.Objectives: We aimed to develop a clinical-grade PRS test suitable for BC risk-stratified screening with clinical recommendations and implementation in clinical practice.Design and methods: In the first phase of our study, we gathered previously published PRS models for predicting BC risk from the literature and validated them using the Estonian Biobank and UK Biobank data sets. We selected the best performing model based on prevalent data and independently validated it in both incident data sets. We then conducted absolute risk simulations, developed risk-based recommendations, and implemented the PRS test in clinical practice. In the second phase, we carried out a retrospective analysis of the PRS test's performance results in clinical practice.Results: The best performing PRS included 2803 SNPs. The C-index of the Cox regression model associating BC status with PRS was 0.656 (SE = 0.05) with a hazard ratio of 1.66. The PRS can stratify individuals with more than a 3-fold risk increase. A total of 2637 BC PRS tests have been performed for women between the ages 30 and 83. Results in clinical use overlap well with expected PRS performance with 5.7% of women with more than 2-fold and 1.4% with more than 3-fold higher risk than the population average.Conclusion: The PRS test separates different BC risk levels and is feasible to implement in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A polygenic risk score predicts breast cancer risk in Latinas
    Shieh, Yiwey
    Fejerman, Laura
    Sawyer, Sarah D.
    Hu, Donglei
    Huntsman, Scott
    John, Esther M.
    Kushi, Lawrence H.
    Torres-Mejia, Gabriela
    Weitzel, Jeffrey N.
    Haiman, Christopher A.
    Ziv, Elad
    Neuhausen, Susan L.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 79 (13)
  • [22] A polygenic risk score for breast cancer risk in a Taiwanese population
    Hsieh, Yi-Chen
    Tu, Shih-Hsin
    Su, Chien-Tien
    Cho, Er-Chieh
    Wu, Chih-Hsiung
    Hsieh, Mao-Chih
    Lin, Shiyng-Yu
    Liu, Yun-Ru
    Hung, Chin-Sheng
    Chiou, Hung-Yi
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 163 (01) : 131 - 138
  • [23] An Improved Polygenic Risk Score for Risk Prediction in Breast Cancer
    Mavaddat, Nasim
    Michailidou, Kyriaki
    Kraft, Peter
    Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
    Simard, Jacques
    Easton, Douglas F.
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 41 (07) : 680 - 681
  • [24] A polygenic risk score for breast cancer risk in a Taiwanese population
    Yi-Chen Hsieh
    Shih-Hsin Tu
    Chien-Tien Su
    Er-Chieh Cho
    Chih-Hsiung Wu
    Mao-Chih Hsieh
    Shiyng-Yu Lin
    Yun-Ru Liu
    Chin-Sheng Hung
    Hung-Yi Chiou
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2017, 163 : 131 - 138
  • [25] Is risk-stratified breast cancer screening economically efficient in Germany?
    Arnold, Matthias
    Pfeifer, Katharina
    Quante, Anne S.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (05):
  • [26] Genetic Testing to Guide Risk-Stratified Screens for Breast Cancer
    Willoughby, Ava
    Andreassen, Paul R.
    Toland, Amanda Ewart
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2019, 9 (01):
  • [27] Risk-Stratified Pancreatectomy Clinical Pathway Implementation and Delayed Gastric Emptying
    Arango, Natalia Paez
    Prakash, Laura R.
    Chiang, Yi-Ju
    Dewhurst, Whitney L.
    Bruno, Morgan L.
    Ikoma, Naruhiko
    Kim, Michael P.
    Lee, Jeffrey E.
    Katz, Matthew H. G.
    Tzeng, Ching-Wei D.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2021, 25 (09) : 2221 - 2230
  • [28] Risk-Stratified Pancreatectomy Clinical Pathway Implementation and Delayed Gastric Emptying
    Natalia Paez Arango
    Laura R. Prakash
    Yi-Ju Chiang
    Whitney L. Dewhurst
    Morgan L. Bruno
    Naruhiko Ikoma
    Michael P. Kim
    Jeffrey E. Lee
    Matthew H.G. Katz
    Ching-Wei D. Tzeng
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2021, 25 : 2221 - 2230
  • [29] Risk-Stratified Radiotherapy in Pediatric Cancer
    Upadhyay, Rituraj
    Paulino, Arnold C.
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (20)
  • [30] The current status of risk-stratified breast screening
    Ash Kieran Clift
    David Dodwell
    Simon Lord
    Stavros Petrou
    Sir Michael Brady
    Gary S. Collins
    Julia Hippisley-Cox
    British Journal of Cancer, 2022, 126 : 533 - 550