Implementation of Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Prevention With a Polygenic Risk Score Test in Clinical Practice

被引:1
|
作者
Padrik, Peeter [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Puustusmaa, Mikk [1 ]
Tonisson, Neeme [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Kolk, Berit [1 ]
Saar, Regina [1 ]
Padrik, Anna [1 ]
Tasa, Tonis [1 ]
机构
[1] OU Antegenes, Tartu, Estonia
[2] Tartu Univ Hosp, Clin Hematol & Oncol, Tartu, Estonia
[3] Univ Tartu, Inst Genom, Tartu, Estonia
[4] Tartu Univ Hosp, Genet & Personalized Med Clin, Tartu, Estonia
[5] OU Antegenes, Raatuse 21, EE-50603 Tartu, Estonia
关键词
breast cancer; polygenic risk score; screening; personalized prevention; genetic predisposition; BENEFITS; PREDICTION; HARMS;
D O I
10.1177/11782234231205700
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Breast cancer (BC) screening with mammography reduces mortality but considers currently only age as a risk factor. Personalized risk-based screening has been proposed as a more efficient alternative. For that, risk prediction tools are necessary. Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous genetic variants (single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]) associated with BC. The effects of SNPs are combined into a polygenic risk score (PRS) as a risk prediction tool.Objectives: We aimed to develop a clinical-grade PRS test suitable for BC risk-stratified screening with clinical recommendations and implementation in clinical practice.Design and methods: In the first phase of our study, we gathered previously published PRS models for predicting BC risk from the literature and validated them using the Estonian Biobank and UK Biobank data sets. We selected the best performing model based on prevalent data and independently validated it in both incident data sets. We then conducted absolute risk simulations, developed risk-based recommendations, and implemented the PRS test in clinical practice. In the second phase, we carried out a retrospective analysis of the PRS test's performance results in clinical practice.Results: The best performing PRS included 2803 SNPs. The C-index of the Cox regression model associating BC status with PRS was 0.656 (SE = 0.05) with a hazard ratio of 1.66. The PRS can stratify individuals with more than a 3-fold risk increase. A total of 2637 BC PRS tests have been performed for women between the ages 30 and 83. Results in clinical use overlap well with expected PRS performance with 5.7% of women with more than 2-fold and 1.4% with more than 3-fold higher risk than the population average.Conclusion: The PRS test separates different BC risk levels and is feasible to implement in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk-stratified breast cancer screening incorporating a polygenic risk score: a survey of UK GPs' knowledge and attitudes
    Ayoub, Aya
    Lapointe, Julie
    Nabi, Hermann
    Pashayan, Nora
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2023, 73
  • [2] Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Screening Incorporating a Polygenic Risk Score: A Survey of UK General Practitioners' Knowledge and Attitudes
    Ayoub, Aya
    Lapointe, Julie
    Nabi, Hermann
    Pashayan, Nora
    GENES, 2023, 14 (03)
  • [3] Polygenic risk scores and risk-stratified breast cancer screening: Familiarity and perspectives of health care professionals
    Lapointe, Julie
    Buron, Anne-Catherine
    Mbuya-Bienge, Cynthia
    Dorval, Michel
    Pashayan, Nora
    Brooks, Jennifer D.
    Walker, Meghan J.
    Chiquette, Jocelyne
    Eloy, Laurence
    Blackmore, Kristina
    Turgeon, Annie
    Lambert-Cote, Laurence
    Leclerc, Lucas
    Dalpe, Gratien
    Joly, Yann
    Knoppers, Bartha Maria
    Chiarelli, Anna Maria
    Simard, Jacques
    Nabi, Hermann
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 24 (11) : 2380 - 2388
  • [4] Implications of polygenic risk-stratified screening for prostate cancer on overdiagnosis
    Pashayan, Nora
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    Neal, David E.
    Hamdy, Freddie
    Donovan, Jenny
    Martin, Richard M.
    Harrington, Patricia
    Benlloch, Sara
    Al Olama, Ali A.
    Shah, Mitul
    Kote-Jarai, Zsofia
    Easton, Douglas F.
    Eeles, Rosalind
    Pharoah, Paul D.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 74 (19)
  • [5] Implications of polygenic risk-stratified screening for prostate cancer on overdiagnosis
    Pashayan, Nora
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    Neal, David E.
    Hamdy, Freddie C.
    Donovan, Jenny L.
    Martin, Richard M.
    Harrington, Patricia
    Benlloch, Sara
    Al Olama, Ali Amin
    Shah, Mitul
    Kote-Jarai, Zsofia
    Easton, Douglas F.
    Eeles, Rosalind
    Pharoah, Paul D.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 17 (10) : 789 - 795
  • [6] Implementation of polygenic risk scores in secondary prevention of (breast) cancer
    van Rooij, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 34
  • [7] Breast cancer risk prediction using a clinical risk model and polygenic risk score
    Shieh, Yiwey
    Hu, Donglei
    Ma, Lin
    Huntsman, Scott
    Gard, Charlotte C.
    Leung, Jessica W. T.
    Tice, Jeffrey A.
    Vachon, Celine M.
    Cummings, Steven R.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Ziv, Elad
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 159 (03) : 513 - 525
  • [8] Breast cancer risk prediction using a clinical risk model and polygenic risk score
    Yiwey Shieh
    Donglei Hu
    Lin Ma
    Scott Huntsman
    Charlotte C. Gard
    Jessica W. T. Leung
    Jeffrey A. Tice
    Celine M. Vachon
    Steven R. Cummings
    Karla Kerlikowske
    Elad Ziv
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016, 159 : 513 - 525
  • [9] Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score and Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk
    Kramer, Iris
    Hooning, Maartje J.
    Mavaddat, Nasim
    Hauptmann, Michael
    Keeman, Renske
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Giardiello, Daniele
    Antoniou, Antonis C.
    Pharoah, Paul D. P.
    Canisius, Sander
    Abu-Ful, Zumuruda
    Andrulis, Irene L.
    Anton-Culver, Hoda
    Aronson, Kristan J.
    Augustinsson, Annelie
    Becher, Heiko
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Behrens, Sabine
    Benitez, Javier
    Bermisheva, Marina
    Bogdanova, Natalia, V
    Bojesen, Stig E.
    Bolla, Manjeet K.
    Bonanni, Bernardo
    Brauch, Hiltrud
    Bremer, Michael
    Brucker, Sara Y.
    Burwinkel, Barbara
    Castelao, Jose E.
    Chan, Tsun L.
    Chang-Claude, Jenny
    Chanock, Stephen J.
    Chenevix-Trench, Georgia
    Choi, Ji-Yeob
    Clarke, Christine L.
    Collee, J. Margriet
    Couch, Fergus J.
    Cox, Angela
    Cross, Simon S.
    Czene, Kamila
    Daly, Mary B.
    Devilee, Peter
    Dork, Thilo
    dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel
    Dunning, Alison M.
    Dwek, Miriam
    Eccles, Diana M.
    Evans, D. Gareth
    Fasching, Peter A.
    Flyger, Henrik
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2020, 107 (05) : 837 - 848
  • [10] Performance of a polygenic risk score combined with clinical assessment for breast cancer risk
    Black, Mary Helen
    Li, Shuwei
    LaDuca, Holly
    Armasu, Sebastian
    Polley, Eric C.
    Fitz-Gibbon, Patrick
    Scott, Chris G.
    Winham, Stacey J.
    Olson, Janet E.
    Ruddy, Kathryn J.
    Vachon, Celine M.
    Couch, Fergus J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (04)