机构:
Madras Sch Econ, Econ Dept, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Madras Sch Econ, Econ Dept, Gandhi Mandapam Rd, Chennai 600025, Tamil Nadu, IndiaMadras Sch Econ, Econ Dept, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Sen, Neelanjan
[1
,3
]
Minocha, Priyansh
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Madras Sch Econ, Econ Dept, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IndiaMadras Sch Econ, Econ Dept, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Minocha, Priyansh
[1
]
Dutta, Arghya
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Max Planck Inst Polymer Res, Polymer Theory Dept, Mainz, GermanyMadras Sch Econ, Econ Dept, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Dutta, Arghya
[2
]
机构:
[1] Madras Sch Econ, Econ Dept, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Max Planck Inst Polymer Res, Polymer Theory Dept, Mainz, Germany
[3] Madras Sch Econ, Econ Dept, Gandhi Mandapam Rd, Chennai 600025, Tamil Nadu, India
This paper considers the possibility of technology licensing via fixed-fee, royalty or two-part tariff and tacit collusion between firms that produce homogeneous goods under asymmetric cost structures and compete in quantities. In contrast to Lin (1996), all forms of licensing facilitate (obstruct) collusion, if the initial cost difference between the firms is relatively less (more). Technology will always be licensed, and the optimal form of licensing is either fixed-fee or royalty or two-part tariff, but collusion may or may not be possible post-licensing. Welfare decreases after licensing if the firms collude only after licensing but not collude under no-licensing.
机构:
Henderson State Univ, Sch Business, Arkadelphia, AR 71999 USAHenderson State Univ, Sch Business, Arkadelphia, AR 71999 USA
Kim, YoungJun
Vonortas, Nicholas S.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
George Washington Univ, Ctr Int Sci & Technol Policy, Dept Econ, 1922 F St,NW,Old Main,Suite 208, Washington, DC 20052 USAHenderson State Univ, Sch Business, Arkadelphia, AR 71999 USA