Affective Responses to Trust Violations in a Human-Autonomy Teaming Context: Humans Versus Robots

被引:2
|
作者
Alarcon, Gene M. [1 ]
Lyons, Joseph B. [1 ]
Hamdan, Izz aldin [2 ]
Jessup, Sarah A. [3 ]
机构
[1] US Air Force, Res Lab, 2245 Monahan Way, Wright Patterson Afb, OH 45433 USA
[2] Gen Dynam Informat Technol, 5000 Springfield St, Dayton, OH 45431 USA
[3] Consortium Univ, NW Suite 500,1020 19Th St, Washington, DC 20036 USA
关键词
Human-robot interaction; Trust; Emotions; Ability; Benevolence; Integrity; HUMAN-AUTOMATION TRUST; PERFORMANCE; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s12369-023-01017-w
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Despite the increasing use of robots in a variety of applications, little is known about the emotional responses humans experience when a robot or a human commits a trust violation. The current paper compares the affective responses of humans paired with either a human or a robot confederate who committed trust violations. Additionally, the current paper utilizes new manipulations in the literature to experimentally manipulate the type of trust violation, namely ability, benevolence, and integrity violations. As expected, when a robot committed an ability violation participants' positive affect decreased more than if the violation was performed by a human. When an integrity or benevolence violation occurred, participants had a greater decrease in positive affect when a human performed the violations than when a robot violated trust. Overall, participants experienced more negative affect with a human partner than a robot partner. Also, ability violations had stronger effects on negative affect than integrity violations. Results indicate humans do have different affective responses when trust is violated, depending on the type of violation as well as the partner performing the violation. Implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 35
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A conceptual model of team dynamical behaviors and performance in human-autonomy teaming
    Demir, Mustafa
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    Amazeen, Polemnia G.
    COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2018, 52 : 497 - 507
  • [42] EXPLICIT CONTINGENCY PLANNING FOR IMPROVED HUMAN-AUTONOMY TEAMING IN DECISION SUPPORT
    Brinton, Chris
    Fernandes, Alicia
    Kaler, Curt
    2020 INTEGRATED COMMUNICATIONS NAVIGATION AND SURVEILLANCE CONFERENCE (ICNS), 2020,
  • [43] Human-Autonomy Teaming Patterns in the Command and Control of Teams of Autonomous Systems
    Lange, Douglas S.
    Gutzwiller, Robert S.
    ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS, (EPCE 2016), 2016, 9736 : 179 - 188
  • [44] Human-autonomy Teaming: Need for a guiding team-based framework?
    O'Neill, Thomas A.
    Flathmann, Christopher
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Salas, Eduardo
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2023, 146
  • [45] Unmanned vehicle plan comparison visualizations for effective human-autonomy teaming
    Behymer, Kyle J.
    Mersch, Elizabeth M.
    Ruff, Heath A.
    Calhoun, Gloria L.
    Spriggs, Sarah E.
    6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS (AHFE 2015) AND THE AFFILIATED CONFERENCES, AHFE 2015, 2015, 3 : 1022 - 1029
  • [46] Training and Verbal Communications in Human-Autonomy Teaming Under Degraded Conditions
    Johnson, Craig J.
    Demir, Mustafa
    Zabala, Garrett M.
    He, Hongbei
    Grimm, David A.
    Radigan, Cody
    Wolff, Alexandra T.
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Gorman, Jamie C.
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE AND COMPUTATIONAL ASPECTS OF SITUATION MANAGEMENT (IEEE COGSIMA), 2020, : 53 - 58
  • [47] Testing Human-Autonomy Teaming Concepts on a Global Positioning System Interface
    Russell, Ricky
    HUMAN INTERFACE AND THE MANAGEMENT OF INFORMATION: INFORMATION IN APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES, HIMI 2018 HELD AS PART OF HCII 2018, PART II, 2018, 10905 : 450 - 464
  • [48] Designing High-Impact Experiments for Human-Autonomy / AI Teaming
    Flathmann, Christopher
    Mcneese, Nathan J.
    O'Neill, Thomas A.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2025,
  • [49] Situation awareness-based agent transparency and human-autonomy teaming effectiveness
    Chen, Jessie Y. C.
    Lakhmani, Shan G.
    Stowers, Kimberly
    Selkowitz, Anthony R.
    Wright, Julia L.
    Barnes, Michael
    THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2018, 19 (03) : 259 - 282
  • [50] Application of Human-Autonomy Teaming to an Advanced Ground Station for Reduced Crew Operations
    Ho, Nhut
    Johnson, Walter
    Panesar, Karanvir
    Wakeland, Kenny
    Sadler, Garrett
    Wilson, Nathan
    Bao Nguyen
    Lachter, Joel
    Brandt, Summer
    2017 IEEE/AIAA 36TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC), 2017,