Affective Responses to Trust Violations in a Human-Autonomy Teaming Context: Humans Versus Robots

被引:2
|
作者
Alarcon, Gene M. [1 ]
Lyons, Joseph B. [1 ]
Hamdan, Izz aldin [2 ]
Jessup, Sarah A. [3 ]
机构
[1] US Air Force, Res Lab, 2245 Monahan Way, Wright Patterson Afb, OH 45433 USA
[2] Gen Dynam Informat Technol, 5000 Springfield St, Dayton, OH 45431 USA
[3] Consortium Univ, NW Suite 500,1020 19Th St, Washington, DC 20036 USA
关键词
Human-robot interaction; Trust; Emotions; Ability; Benevolence; Integrity; HUMAN-AUTOMATION TRUST; PERFORMANCE; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s12369-023-01017-w
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Despite the increasing use of robots in a variety of applications, little is known about the emotional responses humans experience when a robot or a human commits a trust violation. The current paper compares the affective responses of humans paired with either a human or a robot confederate who committed trust violations. Additionally, the current paper utilizes new manipulations in the literature to experimentally manipulate the type of trust violation, namely ability, benevolence, and integrity violations. As expected, when a robot committed an ability violation participants' positive affect decreased more than if the violation was performed by a human. When an integrity or benevolence violation occurred, participants had a greater decrease in positive affect when a human performed the violations than when a robot violated trust. Overall, participants experienced more negative affect with a human partner than a robot partner. Also, ability violations had stronger effects on negative affect than integrity violations. Results indicate humans do have different affective responses when trust is violated, depending on the type of violation as well as the partner performing the violation. Implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 35
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Affective Responses to Trust Violations in a Human-Autonomy Teaming Context: Humans Versus Robots
    Gene M. Alarcon
    Joseph B. Lyons
    Izz aldin Hamdan
    Sarah A. Jessup
    International Journal of Social Robotics, 2024, 16 : 23 - 35
  • [2] Trust and Team Performance in Human-Autonomy Teaming
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Demir, Mustafa
    Chiou, Erin K.
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, 2021, 25 (01) : 51 - 72
  • [3] Understanding the Role of Trust in Human-Autonomy Teaming
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Demir, Mustafa
    Chiou, Erin
    Cooke, Nancy
    Yanikian, Giovanni
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 52ND ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2019, : 254 - 263
  • [4] IMPACTS: a trust model for human-autonomy teaming
    Ming Hou
    Geoffrey Ho
    David Dunwoody
    Human-Intelligent Systems Integration, 2021, 3 (2) : 79 - 97
  • [5] Human-Autonomy Teaming
    How, Jonathan P.
    IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2016, 36 (02): : 3 - 4
  • [6] The Dynamics of Trust and Verbal Anthropomorphism in Human-Autonomy Teaming
    Cohen, Myke C.
    Demir, Mustafa
    Chiou, Erin K.
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS (ICHMS), 2021, : 168 - 173
  • [7] Exploration of Teammate Trust and Interaction Dynamics in Human-Autonomy Teaming
    Demir, Mustafa
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Gorman, Jaime C.
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    Myers, Christopher W.
    Grimm, David A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS, 2021, 51 (06) : 696 - 705
  • [8] Why Human-Autonomy Teaming?
    Shively, R. Jay
    Lachter, Joel
    Brandt, Summer L.
    Matessa, Michael
    Battiste, Vernol
    Johnson, Walter W.
    ADVANCES IN NEUROERGONOMICS AND COGNITIVE ENGINEERING (AHFE 2017), 2018, 586 : 3 - 11
  • [9] Team situation awareness within the context of human-autonomy teaming
    Demir, Mustafa
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2017, 46 : 3 - 12
  • [10] Teaming With a Synthetic Teammate: Insights into Human-Autonomy Teaming
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Demir, Mustafa
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    Myers, Christopher
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2018, 60 (02) : 262 - 273