Sutureless Aortic Valve Prosthesis in Redo Procedures: Single-Center Experience

被引:2
|
作者
Zubarevich, Alina [1 ]
Beltsios, Eleftherios T. [1 ,2 ]
Arjomandi Rad, Arian [3 ]
Amanov, Lukman [1 ]
Szczechowicz, Marcin [1 ]
Ruhparwar, Arjang [3 ]
Weymann, Alexander [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, West German Heart & Vasc Ctr, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Hufelandstr 55, D-45122 Essen, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Cardiothorac Transplant & Vasc Surg, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[3] Univ Oxford, Med Sci Div, Oxford OX3 9DU, Oxon, England
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2023年 / 59卷 / 06期
关键词
sutureless aortic valve; Perceval; SU-AVR; Redo SU-AVR; reoperations; redo; reoperative aortic valve replacement; IN-VALVE; REPLACEMENT; TRANSCATHETER; IMPLANTATION; MORTALITY; RISK;
D O I
10.3390/medicina59061126
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: Sutureless aortic valve prostheses have presented favorable hemodynamic performance while facilitating minimally invasive access approaches. As the population ages, the number of patients at risk for aortic valve reoperation constantly increases. The aim of the present study is to present our single-center experience in sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) in reoperations. Materials and Methods: The data of 18 consecutive patients who underwent SU-AVR in a reoperation between May 2020 and January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The mean age of the patients was 67.9 & PLUSMN; 11.1 years; patients showed a moderate-risk profile with a median logistic EuroSCORE II of 7.8 (IQR of 3.8-32.0) %. The implantation of the Perceval S prosthesis was technically successful in all patients. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 103.3 & PLUSMN; 50.0 min, and the cross-clamp time was 69.1 & PLUSMN; 38.8 min. No patients required a permanent pacemaker implantation. The postoperative gradient was 7.3 & PLUSMN; 2.4 mmHg, and no cases of paravalvular leakage were observed. There was one case of intraprocedural death, while the thirty-day mortality was 11%. Conclusions: Sutureless bioprosthetic valves tend to simplify the surgical procedure of a redo AVR. By maximizing the effective orifice area, sutureless valves may present an important advantage, being a safe and effective alternative not only to traditional surgical prostheses but also to transcatheter valve-in-valve approaches in select cases.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Aortic Valve Surgery in Congenital Heart Disease: A Single-Center Experience
    Coskun, Kasim Oguz
    Popov, Aron Frederik
    Tirilomis, Theodor
    Schmitto, Jan Dieter
    Coskun, Sinan Tolga
    Hinz, Jose
    Schoendube, Friedrich Albert
    Ruschewski, Wolfgang
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2010, 34 (03) : E85 - E90
  • [22] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Single-Center Experience of 300 Cases
    Finkelstein, Ariel
    Birati, Edo Y.
    Abramowitz, Yigal
    Steinvil, Arie
    Sheinberg, Nechama
    Biner, Simon
    Bazan, Shmuel
    Ben Gal, Yanai
    Halkin, Amir
    Arbel, Yaron
    Ben-Assa, Eyal
    Leshem-Rubinow, Eran
    Keren, Gad
    Banai, Shmuel
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2013, 15 (10): : 613 - 616
  • [23] Leadless pacemaker with transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A single-center experience
    Gao, Feng
    Kherallah, Riyad
    Koetting, Mackenzie
    Simpson, Leo
    Seger, John
    Koneru, Srikanth
    Coselli, Joseph
    Preventza, Ourania
    Orozco-Sevilla, Vicente
    Manon, Nastasya
    Silva, Guilherme, V
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 46 (07): : 615 - 622
  • [24] Aortic Valve Replacement with the Mitroflow Pericardial Bioprosthesis: Single-Center Experience
    Savini, C.
    Careddu, L.
    Pantaleo, A.
    Pilato, E.
    Suarez, S. Martin
    Folesani, G.
    Rasovic, O.
    Ferlito, M.
    Moretti, C.
    Di Bartolomeo, R.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 115 (04) : 285 - 286
  • [25] Sutureless aortic valve prosthesis in a calcified homograft
    Capestro, Filippo
    Massaccesi, Simone
    Matteucci, M. L. Sacha
    Torracca, Lucia
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 150 (03): : E29 - E30
  • [26] Aortic valve replacement with a new sutureless aortic valve Perceval S prosthesis: 12 months of Polish experience
    Niklewski, Tomasz
    Filipiak, Krzysztof
    Przybylski, Roman
    Zembala, Michal
    Kukulski, Tomasz
    Zembala, Marian
    KARDIOCHIRURGIA I TORAKOCHIRURGIA POLSKA, 2012, 9 (02): : 165 - 169
  • [27] Sutureless aortic bioprosthesis: Competitor or alternative for transcatheter aortic valve implantation? Single center experience with Perceval valves
    Olasinska-Wisniewska, Anna
    Buczkowski, Piotr
    Perek, Bartlomiej
    Puslecki, Mateusz
    Bocianski, Michal
    Stefaniak, Sebastian
    Urbanowicz, Tomasz
    Grygier, Marek
    Esiak, Maciej L.
    Jemielity, Marek
    CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 29 (04) : 724 - 726
  • [28] Valve-in-Valve TAVI for Regurgitant Sutureless Aortic Prosthesis
    Silberman, Shuli
    Almagor, Yaron
    Balkin, Jonathan
    Wollak, Arik
    Fink, Daniel
    Merin, Ofer
    Rosenmann, David
    Bitran, Daniel
    CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 134 (02) : 287 - 287
  • [29] Single centre experience in 1202 biological prosthesis: a comparison between sutured, sutureless and surgical transcatheter aortic valve
    Mariani, C.
    Murana, G.
    Botta, L.
    Gliozzi, G.
    Folesani, G.
    Santamaria, V.
    Tassi, S.
    Di Marco, L.
    Pacini, D.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 42 : 2259 - 2259
  • [30] Single center experience with the novel Carpentier Edwards Inspiris Resilia Aortic Valve Prosthesis
    Wallner, Stephanie
    Taheri, Niuscha
    Arnold, Zsuzsanna
    Mach, Markus
    Geissler, Daniela
    Weiss, Gabriel
    Moidl, Reinhard
    Folkmann, Sandra
    Harrer, Marie-Luise
    Winkler, Bernhard
    Grabenwoeger, Martin
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2019, 131 : 414 - 414