Effectiveness and Cost of an Enhanced Mailed Fecal Test Outreach Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Stepped-Wedge Trial

被引:5
|
作者
Coronado, Gloria D. [1 ]
Nyongesa, Denis B. [1 ]
Escaron, Anne L. [2 ]
Petrik, Amanda F. [1 ]
Thompson, Jamie H. [1 ]
Smith, Dave [1 ]
Davis, Melinda M. [3 ]
Schneider, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Rivelli, Jennifer S. [1 ]
Laguna, Tanya [2 ]
Leo, Michael C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente Ctr Hlth Res, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227 USA
[2] AltaMed Hlth Serv Corp, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COMMUNITY-HEALTH CENTERS; COLON-CANCER; INVITATION STRATEGIES; IMMUNOCHEMICAL TESTS; POPULATION; ADHERENCE; INTERVENTIONS; DESIGN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0597
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach can improve colorectal cancer screening rates, yet little is known about how to optimize these programs for effectiveness and cost.Methods: PROMPT was a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized effectiveness trial of mailed FIT outreach. Participants in the standard condition were mailed a FIT and received live telephone reminders to return it. Participants in the enhanced condition also received a tailored advance notification (text message or live phone call) and two automated phone call reminders. The primary outcome was 6-month FIT completion; secondary outcomes were any colorectal cancer screening completion at 6 months, implementation, and program costs.Results: The study included 27,585 participants (80% ages 50-64, 82% Hispanic/Latino; 68% preferred Spanish). A higher proportion of enhanced participants completed FIT at 6 months than standard participants, both in intention-to-treat [+2.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI; 0.4-5.2)] and per-protocol [limited to individuals who were reached; +16.9%, 95% CI (12.3-20.3)] analyses. Text messages and automated calls were successfully delivered to 91% to 100% of participants. The per-patient cost for standard mailed FIT was $10.84. The enhanced program's text message plus automated call reminder cost an additional $0.66; live phone calls plus an automated call reminder cost an additional $10.82 per patient.Conclusions: Adding advance notifications and automated calls to a standard mailed FIT program boosted 6-month FIT completion rates at a small additional per-patient cost.Impact: Enhancements to mailed FIT outreach can improve colorectal cancer screening participation. Future research might test the addition of educational video messaging for screening-naive adults.
引用
收藏
页码:1608 / 1616
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PROACTIVE OUTREACH WITH MAILED FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST (FIT) AND NAVIGATION ENHANCES COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING AMONG BLACKS AT AN URBAN FEDERALLY QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTER
    Das, Taranika Sarkar
    Rauch, Jessica H.
    Meng, Xucong
    Stromberg, Jennifer
    Augustin, Ashley
    Shaukat, Aasma
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 166 (05) : S922 - S923
  • [32] Impact of a Geriatric Intervention to Improve Screening and Management of Undernutrition in Older Patients Undergoing Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Results of the ANC Stepped-Wedge Trial
    Gilbert, Thomas
    Bernard, Lorraine
    Alexandre, Marine
    Bin-Dorel, Sylvie
    Villeneuve, Laurent
    Decullier, Evelyne
    Bonnefoy, Marc
    NUTRIENTS, 2021, 13 (07)
  • [33] A Centralized Mailed Program With Stepped Increases of Support Increases Time in Compliance With Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines Over 5 Years: A Randomized Trial
    Green, Beverly B.
    Anderson, Melissa L.
    Cook, Andrea J.
    Chubak, Jessica
    Fuller, Sharon
    Meenan, Richard T.
    Vernon, Sally W.
    CANCER, 2017, 123 (22) : 4472 - 4480
  • [34] Predictive Modeling of Colonoscopic Findings in a Fecal-Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program
    Law, Jade
    Rajan, Anand
    Trieu, Harry
    Azizian, John
    Berry, Rani
    Beaven, Simon W.
    Tabibian, James H.
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2022, 67 (07) : 2842 - 2848
  • [35] Direct-to-member mailed colorectal cancer screening outreach for Medicaid and Medicare enrollees: Implementation and effectiveness outcomes from the BeneFIT study
    Coronado, Gloria D.
    Green, Beverly B.
    West, Imara I.
    Schwartz, Malaika R.
    Coury, Jennifer K.
    Vollmer, William M.
    Shapiro, Jean A.
    Petrik, Amanda F.
    Baldwin, Laura-Mae
    CANCER, 2020, 126 (03) : 540 - 548
  • [36] COLORECTAL-CANCER SCREENING - COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF THE FECAL OCCULT BLOOD-TEST WITH AND WITHOUT REHYDRATION
    LANG, CA
    RANSOHOFF, DF
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1994, 106 (04) : A15 - A15
  • [37] Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening using colonoscopy, fecal immunochemical test, and risk score
    Sekiguchi, Masau
    Igarashi, Ataru
    Sakamoto, Taku
    Saito, Yutaka
    Esaki, Minoru
    Matsuda, Takahisa
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 35 (09) : 1555 - 1561
  • [38] Cost-Effectiveness between Double and Single Fecal Immunochemical Test(s) in a Mass Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Cai, Shan-Rong
    Zhu, Hong-Hong
    Huang, Yan-Qin
    Li, Qi-Long
    Ma, Xin-Yuan
    Zhang, Su-Zhan
    Zheng, Shu
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 2016
  • [39] Video brochures in a mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach program provide cancer screening information in a user-friendly format for rural Appalachian community members
    Katz, Mira L.
    Shoben, Abigail B.
    Newell, Sabrina
    Hall, Christina
    Emerson, Brent
    Gray II, Darrell M.
    Chakraborty, Subhankar
    Reiter, Paul L.
    JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2024, 40 (01): : 96 - 103
  • [40] Neighborhood socioeconomic status and the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening outreach with mailed fecal immunochemical tests within a safety net healthcare system in San Francisco, CA: A subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial
    McClellan, Sean P.
    Canchola, Alison J.
    Potter, Michael B.
    Gomez, Scarlett L.
    Somsouk, Ma
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 167