Effectiveness and Cost of an Enhanced Mailed Fecal Test Outreach Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Stepped-Wedge Trial

被引:5
|
作者
Coronado, Gloria D. [1 ]
Nyongesa, Denis B. [1 ]
Escaron, Anne L. [2 ]
Petrik, Amanda F. [1 ]
Thompson, Jamie H. [1 ]
Smith, Dave [1 ]
Davis, Melinda M. [3 ]
Schneider, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Rivelli, Jennifer S. [1 ]
Laguna, Tanya [2 ]
Leo, Michael C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente Ctr Hlth Res, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227 USA
[2] AltaMed Hlth Serv Corp, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COMMUNITY-HEALTH CENTERS; COLON-CANCER; INVITATION STRATEGIES; IMMUNOCHEMICAL TESTS; POPULATION; ADHERENCE; INTERVENTIONS; DESIGN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0597
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach can improve colorectal cancer screening rates, yet little is known about how to optimize these programs for effectiveness and cost.Methods: PROMPT was a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized effectiveness trial of mailed FIT outreach. Participants in the standard condition were mailed a FIT and received live telephone reminders to return it. Participants in the enhanced condition also received a tailored advance notification (text message or live phone call) and two automated phone call reminders. The primary outcome was 6-month FIT completion; secondary outcomes were any colorectal cancer screening completion at 6 months, implementation, and program costs.Results: The study included 27,585 participants (80% ages 50-64, 82% Hispanic/Latino; 68% preferred Spanish). A higher proportion of enhanced participants completed FIT at 6 months than standard participants, both in intention-to-treat [+2.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI; 0.4-5.2)] and per-protocol [limited to individuals who were reached; +16.9%, 95% CI (12.3-20.3)] analyses. Text messages and automated calls were successfully delivered to 91% to 100% of participants. The per-patient cost for standard mailed FIT was $10.84. The enhanced program's text message plus automated call reminder cost an additional $0.66; live phone calls plus an automated call reminder cost an additional $10.82 per patient.Conclusions: Adding advance notifications and automated calls to a standard mailed FIT program boosted 6-month FIT completion rates at a small additional per-patient cost.Impact: Enhancements to mailed FIT outreach can improve colorectal cancer screening participation. Future research might test the addition of educational video messaging for screening-naive adults.
引用
收藏
页码:1608 / 1616
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Reach of Calls and Text Messages for Mailed FIT Outreach in the PROMPT Stepped-Wedge Colorectal Cancer Screening Trial
    Coronado, Gloria D.
    Nyongesa, Denis B.
    Petrik, Amanda F.
    Thompson, Jamie H.
    Escaron, Anne L.
    Pham, Tuan
    Leo, Michael C.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2024, 33 (04) : 525 - 533
  • [2] Cost Effectiveness of Mailed Outreach Programs for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Analysis of a Pragmatic, Randomized Trial
    Kapinos, Kandice A.
    Halm, Ethan A.
    Murphy, Caitlin C.
    Santini, Noel O.
    Loewen, Adam C.
    Skinner, Celette Sugg
    Singal, Amit G.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 20 (10) : 2383 - +
  • [3] Increased Colorectal Cancer Screening Sustained with Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach
    Lee, Briton
    Keyes, Erin
    Rachocki, Carly
    Grimes, Barbara
    Chen, Ellen
    Vittinghoff, Eric
    Ladabaum, Uri
    Somsouk, Ma
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 20 (06) : 1326 - +
  • [4] Effect of Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach for Patients Newly Eligible for Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Shohei Burns
    Jon Wang
    Ma Somsouk
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2023, 68 : 2315 - 2317
  • [5] Effect of Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach for Patients Newly Eligible for Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Burns, Shohei
    Wang, Jon
    Somsouk, Ma
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2023, 68 (06) : 2315 - 2317
  • [6] Bundling Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach with Screening for Social Risk in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Stepped-Wedge Implementation-Effectiveness Study
    Kruse, Gina R.
    Percac-Lima, Sanja
    Barber-Dubois, Marjanna
    Davies, Madeline E.
    Gundersen, Daniel A.
    Ho, Oanh
    Mascioli, Lynette
    Munshi, Mehezbin
    Perry, Sarah
    Singh, Deepinder
    Thomas, Annette
    Emmons, Karen M.
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 39 (07) : 1188 - 1195
  • [7] Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Study
    Coronado, Gloria D.
    Thompson, Jamie H.
    Petrik, Amanda F.
    Nyongesa, Denis B.
    Leo, Michael C.
    Castillo, Melissa
    Younger, Brittany
    Escaron, Anne
    Chen, Alex
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (03) : 318 - 328
  • [8] BUNDLING COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING OUTREACH WITH SCREENING FOR SOCIAL RISK IN FEDERALLY QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTERS: A STEPPED-WEDGE IMPLEMENTATION-EFFECTIVENESS PILOT STUDY
    Percac-Lima, Sanja
    Kruse, Gina R.
    Gundersen, Daniel
    Mascioli, Lynette
    Singh, Deepinder
    Munshi, Mehezbin
    Emmons, Karen
    Haas, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2023, 38 : S161 - S161
  • [9] EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPLETING MAILED SCREENING FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST ON RISK OF DYING FROM COLORECTAL CANCER.
    Doubeni, Chyke
    Schottinger, Joanne E.
    Jensen, Christopher D.
    Levin, Theodore R.
    Ghai, Nirupa R.
    Cannavale, Kimberly
    Zhao, Wei K.
    Selby, Kevin
    Zauber, Ann G.
    Fletcher, Robert
    Weiss, Noel
    Corley, Douglas A.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 166 (05) : S106 - S107
  • [10] Bundling colorectal cancer screening outreach with screening for social risk in federally qualified health centers: a stepped-wedge implementation-effectiveness pilot study
    Kruse, Gina
    Percac-Lima, Sanja
    Gundersen, Daniel
    Singh, Deepinder
    Mascioli, Lynnette
    Munshi, Mehezbin
    Davies, Madeline
    Emmons, Karen
    Haas, Jennifer
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2023, 18