Analysis of machine learning models and data sources to forecast burst pressure of petroleum corroded pipelines: A comprehensive review

被引:9
|
作者
Soomro, Afzal Ahmed [1 ]
Mokhtar, Ainul Akmar [1 ]
Hussin, Hilmi B. [1 ]
Lashari, Najeebullah [2 ,3 ]
Oladosu, Temidayo Lekan [1 ]
Jameel, Syed Muslim [4 ]
Inayat, Muddasser [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol PETRONAS, Mech Engn Dept, Perak Darul Ridzuan 32610, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol PETRONAS, Petr Engn Dept, Perak Darul Ridzuan 32610, Malaysia
[3] Dawood Univ Engn & Technol, Petr & Gas Engn Dept, MA Jinnah Rd, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
[4] Univ Galway UoG, Sch Engn, Sustainable & Resilient Struct Lab, Galway, Ireland
[5] Aalto Univ, Sch Engn, Mech Engn Dept, Res Grp Energy Convers, Espoo 02150, Finland
关键词
Oil and Gas Pipes; Corroded Pipeline; Burst pressure; Machine learning; Artificial Intelligence; Numerical Analysis; CORROSION DEFECTS; FAILURE PRESSURE; PITTING CORROSION; GAS-PIPELINES; LINE PIPE; OIL; PREDICTION; RELIABILITY; STRENGTH; LOAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107747
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
A comprehensive evaluation of the integrity of oil and gas pipelines subjected to corrosion defect is required for forecasting health & safety actions. If corrosion is ignored, it may have significant repercussions on a person's health, finances, and the environment. The preponderance of failure pressure prediction research uses numerical simulations and industry-specific codes. However, the complexity and magnitude of deteriorated pipe systems make machine learning based technologies such as artificial neural networks, support vector machines, deep neural networks, and hybrid supervised learning models more suited. Current ML research techniques that predict burst pressure lack a comprehensive review. This research aims to evaluate the present ML techniques (methodology, variables, datasets, and bibliometric analysis; Most active researchers, journals, regions around the world and institution). Based on the results the most widely used machine learning model is ANN followed by SVM but still they have some major limitations such as overfitting and generalization, but other machine learning models such as random forest and ensemble models along with theory guided models have been utilized even though still a very little research has been carried out. The most commonly datasets used to build these models are either experimental or numerical simulations conspiring of inputs and outputs as geometry and pipe material-based parameters such as pipe diameter, material grade, defect depth-breadthlength, and wall thickness. Most of these datasets have been built by known institutions such as PETROBRAS, KOGAS, BRITISH PETROLEUM and Waterloo university. In addition, this analysis revealed research limitations and inadequacies, including data availability, accuracy, and validation. Finally, some future recommendations and opinions are presented such as collaboration between institutions to share the dataset, providing more practical models such as physics informed machine learning and digital twins in the field.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comprehensive review of the dairy pasteurization process using machine learning models
    Singh, Poornima
    Pandey, Surabhi
    Manik, Subhadip
    FOOD CONTROL, 2024, 164
  • [32] Groundwater level prediction using machine learning models: A comprehensive review
    Tao, Hai
    Hameed, Mohammed Majeed
    Marhoon, Haydar Abdulameer
    Zounemat-Kermani, Mohammed
    Heddam, Salim
    Kim, Sungwon
    Sulaiman, Sadeq Oleiwi
    Tan, Mou Leong
    Sa'adi, Zulfaqar
    Mehrm, Ali Danandeh
    Allawi, Mohammed Falah
    Abba, S., I
    Zain, Jasni Mohamad
    Falah, Mayadah W.
    Jamei, Mehdi
    Bokde, Neeraj Dhanraj
    Bayatvarkeshi, Maryam
    Al-Mukhtar, Mustafa
    Bhagat, Suraj Kumar
    Tiyasha, Tiyasha
    Khedher, Khaled Mohamed
    Al-Ansari, Nadhir
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    Yaseen, Zaher Mundher
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2022, 489 : 271 - 308
  • [33] The Cost of Training Machine Learning Models Over Distributed Data Sources
    Guerra, Elia
    Wilhelmi, Francesc
    Miozzo, Marco
    Dini, Paolo
    IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF THE COMMUNICATIONS SOCIETY, 2023, 4 : 1111 - 1126
  • [34] Editorial: Statistical and machine learning approach to earthquake forecast: Models, laboratory and field data
    Lyubushin, Alexey
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [35] Data augmentation using SMOTE technique: Application for prediction of burst pressure of hydrocarbons pipeline using supervised machine learning models
    Soomro, Afzal Ahmed
    Mokhtar, Ainul Akmar
    Muhammad, Masdi B.
    Saad, Mohamad Hanif Md
    Lashari, Najeebullah
    Hussain, Muhammad
    Palli, Abdul Sattar
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2024, 24
  • [36] Sensitivity Analysis of the Composite Data-Driven Pipelines in the Automated Machine Learning
    Barabanova, Irina, V
    Vychuzhanin, Pavel
    Nikitin, Nikolay O.
    10TH INTERNATIONAL YOUNG SCIENTISTS CONFERENCE IN COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE (YSC2021), 2021, 193 : 484 - 493
  • [37] From Data to Forecast: A Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Rainfall Prediction in Australia
    Karunarathna, Yashodha
    Chua, Caslon
    2024 IEEE 48TH ANNUAL COMPUTERS, SOFTWARE, AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE, COMPSAC 2024, 2024, : 169 - 178
  • [38] Machine learning for fault analysis in rotating machinery: A comprehensive review
    Das, Oguzhan
    Das, Duygu Bagci
    Birant, Derya
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (06)
  • [39] Astronomical big data processing using machine learning: A comprehensive review
    Sen, Snigdha
    Agarwal, Sonali
    Chakraborty, Pavan
    Singh, Krishna Pratap
    EXPERIMENTAL ASTRONOMY, 2022, 53 (01) : 1 - 43
  • [40] Astronomical big data processing using machine learning: A comprehensive review
    Snigdha Sen
    Sonali Agarwal
    Pavan Chakraborty
    Krishna Pratap Singh
    Experimental Astronomy, 2022, 53 : 1 - 43