Evaluation of the Sysmex DI-60 digital morphology analyzer on Wright-stained samples with a focus on prevalence-dependent quality indicators

被引:1
|
作者
Hollenstein, Marlene [1 ]
Tueni, Andrea [1 ]
Wiedermann, Jasmin [1 ]
Eisenbock, Bettina [1 ]
Thalhammer, Renate [1 ]
Haslacher, Helmuth [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Lab Med, Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Lab Med, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
DI-60; differential count; hematology; prevalence; trueness;
D O I
10.1111/ijlh.14179
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: This study aims to evaluate the trueness of the DI-60 Digital Cell Imaging Analyzer on Wright-stained samples with a focus on prevalence-dependent quality indicators for differential blood counts requested from non-hematology wards.Methods: Two hundred and ninety-nine samples were included into this performance evaluation study at the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna. The following aspects were verified: (a) the reliability of automatedly pre-classified differential counts, (b) the concordance of DI-60 counts with manual-microscopic differential counts and (c) the agreement of DI-60 and manual-microscopic results regarding clinically relevant findings.Results: 82.3% of all leukocytes were correctly pre-classified. Cell categories with a low prevalence (eosinophils, basophils, progenitors/precursors) in non-hematological patients presented with a low positive predictive value (PPV), indicating a high frequency of false positives. Comparisons between visually adjusted results of the DI-60 and manual-microscopic differential counts revealed a good concordance for neutrophil and lymphocyte counts. Besides the detection of precursors/progenitors and normoblasts, no relevant systemic errors were detected. However, due to their low prevalence and technical aspects, the detection of basophilia, monocytosis or the presence of precursors/progenitors showed comparably low accuracies (error rates of 7.4%-24.1%).Conclusion: The DI-60 system works well for Wright-stained samples collected in the non-hematology ward. Due to the varying prevalence of cell categories found in peripheral blood, a low PPV can be expected with automatic assignment for those cells with low prevalence (e.g., basophils, eosinophils, precursor and progenitor cells, plasma cells). If the pre-test probability of these conditions is increased, manual microscopic processing may be recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 91
页数:9
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] PERFORMANCE OF AUTOMATED DIGITAL CELL MORPHOLOGY ANALYZER SYSMEX DI-60
    Kim, Hanah
    Kim, Hyeong Nyeon
    Hur, Mina
    Kim, Seung Wan
    Moon, Hee-Won
    Yun, Yeo-Min
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY, 2016, 38 : 54 - 54
  • [2] Detection of Plasmodium falciparum using automated digital cell morphology analyzer Sysmex DI-60
    Park, Mikyoung
    Hur, Mina
    Kim, Hanah
    Kim, Hyeong Nyeon
    Kim, Seung Wan
    Moon, Hee-Won
    Yun, Yeo-Min
    Cheong, Hae Suk
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2018, 56 (12) : E284 - E287
  • [3] Performance evaluation of the digital morphology analyser Sysmex DI-60 for white blood cell differentials in abnormal samples
    Zhao, Yan
    Diao, Yingying
    Zheng, Jun
    Li, Xinyao
    Luan, Hong
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [4] Analytical performance of the digital morphology analyzer Sysmex DI-60 for body fluid cell differential counts
    Yoon, Sumi
    Kim, Hye Ryoun
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (07):
  • [5] Determination of Platelet Estimate Factor of Sysmex DI-60 Digital Morphology Analyzer for Platelet Count Estimation
    Tantanate, Chaicharoen
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2024, 148 (09) : 1046 - 1051
  • [6] Analytical validation of white blood cell differential and platelet assessment on the Sysmex DI-60 digital morphology analyzer
    Lapic, Ivana
    Milos, Marija
    Dorotic, Marija
    Drenski, Valentina
    Herak, Desiree Coen
    Rogic, Dunja
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY, 2023, 45 (05) : 668 - 677
  • [7] Performance evaluation of the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60 integrated into the fully automated Sysmex XN hematology analyzer system
    Tabe, Yoko
    Yamamoto, Takemasa
    Maenou, Imiko
    Nakai, Rie
    Idei, Mayumi
    Horii, Takashi
    Miida, Takashi
    Ohsaka, Akimichi
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2015, 53 (02) : 281 - 289
  • [8] Performance Assessment of Sysmex DI-60: Is Digital Morphology Analyzer Reliable for White Blood Cell Differentials in Body Fluids?
    Shin, Eunju
    Hur, Mina
    Kim, Hanah
    Lee, Gun-Hyuk
    Hong, Mi-Hyun
    Nam, Minjeong
    Lee, Seungho
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (06)
  • [9] Digital Morphology Analyzer Sysmex DI-60 vs . Manual Counting for White Blood Cell Differentials in Leukopenic Samples: A Comparative Assessment of Risk and Turnaround Time
    Nam, Minjeong
    Yoon, Sumi
    Hur, Mina
    Lee, Gun Hyuk
    Kim, Hanah
    Park, Mikyoung
    Kim, Hyeong Nyeon
    ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2022, 42 (04) : 398 - +
  • [10] Could the UKNEQAS program "Manual Differential Blood Count" be performed by the use of an automated digital morphology analyzer (Sysmex DI-60)? A feasibility study
    Rosetti, Marco
    Massari, Evita
    Poletti, Giovanni
    Dorizzi, Romolo M.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 59 (04) : E161 - E164