Linking freshwater ecotoxicity to damage on ecosystem services in life cycle assessment

被引:20
|
作者
Oginah, Susan A. [1 ]
Posthuma, Leo [2 ,3 ]
Maltby, Lorraine [4 ]
Hauschild, Michael [1 ]
Fantke, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Environm & Resource Engn, Quantitat Sustainabil Assessment, Produktionstorvet 424, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, POB 1, NL-3720 Bilthoven, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Environm Sci, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Sheffield, Sch Biosci, Sheffield S10, England
关键词
Species loss; Ecosystem functioning; Species diversity; Functional diversity; Chemical toxicity; Life cycle impact assessment; SPECIES SENSITIVITY DISTRIBUTIONS; IMPROVING SUBSTANCE INFORMATION; GENETIC DIVERSITY; COMMUNITY-LEVEL; RISK-ASSESSMENT; BIODIVERSITY; FRAMEWORK; IMPACT; CHEMICALS; FATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2022.107705
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Freshwater ecosystems provide major benefits to human wellbeing-so-called ecosystem services (ES)-but are currently threatened among others by ecotoxicological pressure from chemicals reaching the environment. There is an increased motivation to incorporate ES in quantification tools that support decision-making, such as life cycle assessment (LCA). However, mechanistic models and frameworks that can systematically translate eco-toxicity effect data from chemical tests into eventual damage on species diversity, functional diversity, and ES in the field are still missing. While current approaches focus on translating predicted ecotoxicity impacts to damage in terms of species loss, no approaches are available in LCA and other comparative assessment frameworks for linking ecotoxicity to damage on ecosystem functioning or ES.To overcome this challenge, we propose a way forward based on evaluating available approaches to char-acterize damage of chemical pollution on freshwater ES. We first outline an overall framework for linking freshwater ecotoxicity effects to damage on related ES in compliance with the boundary conditions of quanti-tative, comparative assessments. Second, within the proposed framework, we present possible approaches for stepwise linking ecotoxicity effects to species loss, functional diversity loss, and damage on ES. Finally, we discuss strengths, limitations, and data availability of possible approaches for each step.Although most approaches for directly deriving damage on ES from either species loss or damage to functional diversity have not been operationalized, there are some promising ways forward. The Threshold Indicator Taxa ANalysis (TITAN) seems suitable to translate predicted ecotoxicity effects to a metric of quantitative damage on species diversity. A Trait Probability Density Framework (TPD) approach that incorporates various functional diversity components and functional groups could be adapted to link species loss to functional diversity loss. An Ecological Production Function (EPF) approach seems most promising for further linking functional diversity loss to damage on ES flows for human wellbeing. However, in order to integrate the entire pathway from predicted freshwater ecotoxicity to damage on ES into LCA and other comparative frameworks, the approaches adopted for each step need to be harmonized in terms of assumptions, boundary conditions and consistent interfaces with each other.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental sustainability of conventional and organic farming: Accounting for ecosystem services in life cycle assessment
    Boone, Lieselot
    Roldan-Ruiz, Isabel
    Van Linden, Veerle
    Muylle, Hilde
    Dewulf, Jo
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 695
  • [22] Integrated earth system dynamic modeling for life cycle impact assessment of ecosystem services
    Arbault, Damien
    Riviere, Mylene
    Rugani, Benedetto
    Benetto, Enrico
    Tiruta-Barna, Ligia
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 472 : 262 - 272
  • [23] Ecosystem Services in Life Cycle Assessment while Encouraging Techno-Ecological Synergies
    Liu, Xinyu
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2019, 23 (02) : 347 - 360
  • [24] Biodiversity and ecosystem services in life cycle impact assessment - Inventory objects or impact categories?
    Callesen, Ingeborg
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 22 : 94 - 103
  • [25] Ecosystem services in life cycle assessment - Part 2: Adaptations to regional and serviceshed information
    Liu, Xinyu
    Ziv, Guy
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 197 : 772 - 780
  • [26] Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services
    Fu, Bojie
    Wang, Shuai
    Su, Changhong
    Forsius, Martin
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (01) : 4 - 10
  • [27] Linking ecosystem services to strategic environmental assessment in development policies
    Kumar, Pushpam
    Esen, Sitki Ersin
    Yashiro, Makiko
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2013, 40 : 75 - 81
  • [28] Linking ecosystem services to strategic environmental assessment in development policies
    Kumar, Pushpam
    Esen, Sitki Ersin
    Yashiro, Makiko
    Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2013, 40 : 75 - 81
  • [29] Linking ecosystem services to strategic environmental assessment in: Development policies
    Ecosystem Services Economics Unit of Division of Environmental Policy Implementation , United Nations Environment Programme , P.O. Box 30522, Nairobi
    00100, Kenya
    Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 2013, 1 (75-81):
  • [30] Terrestrial ecotoxicity and effect factors of metals in life cycle assessment (LCA)
    Haye, Sebastien
    Slaveykova, Vera I.
    Payet, Jerome
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2007, 68 (08) : 1489 - 1496