Symbolic Regression via Control Variable Genetic Programming

被引:2
|
作者
Jiang, Nan [1 ]
Xue, Yexiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Comp Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
Control Variable Experiment; Symbolic Regression; ALGORITHMS; DISCOVERY;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-43421-1_11
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Learning symbolic expressions directly from experiment data is a vital step in AI-driven scientific discovery. Nevertheless, state-of-the-art approaches are limited to learning simple expressions. Regressing expressions involving many independent variables still remain out of reach. Motivated by the control variable experiments widely utilized in science, we propose Control Variable Genetic Programming (CVGP) for symbolic regression over many independent variables. CVGP expedites symbolic expression discovery via customized experiment design, rather than learning from a fixed dataset collected a priori. CVGP starts by fitting simple expressions involving a small set of independent variables using genetic programming, under controlled experiments where other variables are held as constants. It then extends expressions learned in previous generations by adding new independent variables, using new control variable experiments in which these variables are allowed to vary. Theoretically, we show CVGP as an incremental building approach can yield an exponential reduction in the search space when learning a class of expressions. Experimentally, CVGP outperforms several baselines in learning symbolic expressions involving multiple independent variables.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 195
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Genetic Programming with Rademacher Complexity for Symbolic Regression
    Raymond, Christian
    Chen, Qi
    Xue, Bing
    Zhang, Mengjie
    2019 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2019, : 2657 - 2664
  • [22] Memetic Semantic Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Leite, Alessandro
    Schoenauer, Marc
    GENETIC PROGRAMMING, EUROGP 2023, 2023, 13986 : 198 - 212
  • [23] Semantic Linear Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Huang, Zhixing
    Mei, Yi
    Zhong, Jinghui
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, 2024, 54 (02) : 1321 - 1334
  • [24] Relieving Coefficient Learning in Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression via Correlation and Linear Scaling
    Chen, Qi
    Xue, Bing
    Banzhaf, Wolfgang
    Zhang, Mengjie
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, GECCO 2023, 2023, : 420 - 437
  • [25] Genetic Programming for Instance Transfer Learning in Symbolic Regression
    Chen, Qi
    Xue, Bing
    Zhang, Mengjie
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, 2022, 52 (01) : 25 - 38
  • [26] Sensitivity analysis of genetic programming: A case of symbolic regression
    Chen, SH
    Kuo, TW
    Shieh, YP
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH JOINT CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2002, : 1119 - 1122
  • [27] Bingo: A Customizable Framework for Symbolic Regression with Genetic Programming
    Randall, David L.
    Townsend, Tyler S.
    Hochhalter, Jacob D.
    Bomarito, Geoffrey F.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION, GECCO 2022, 2022, : 2282 - 2288
  • [28] Investigation of Linear Genetic Programming Techniques for Symbolic Regression
    Dal Piccol Sotto, Leo Francoso
    de Melo, Vinicius Veloso
    2014 BRAZILIAN CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (BRACIS), 2014, : 146 - 151
  • [29] Population diversity and inheritance in genetic programming for symbolic regression
    Burlacu, Bogdan
    Yang, Kaifeng
    Affenzeller, Michael
    NATURAL COMPUTING, 2024, 23 (03) : 531 - 566
  • [30] Cartesian Genetic Programming with Module Mutation for Symbolic Regression
    Kushida, Jun-ichi
    Hara, Akira
    Takahama, Tetsuyuki
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2018, : 159 - 164