Comparison of Conventional Tube Test and a Novel Gel Method to Detect C3d in the Direct Antiglobulin Test

被引:0
|
作者
Vazquez-Gomez, G. [1 ]
Parsons, J. [2 ]
Peterson, T. [3 ]
Keller, M. [4 ]
Billingsley, K. [3 ]
Amniai, L.
Roback, J. [5 ]
Chiu, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Grifols Diagnost Solut Inc, Emeryville, CA USA
[2] Pathol Associates Albuquerque, Albuquerque, NM USA
[3] LifeShare Blood Ctr, Shreveport, LA USA
[4] Amer Red Cross, Washington, DC USA
[5] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/trf.233_17554
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
P-IG-15
引用
收藏
页码:178A / 179A
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of conventional tube test and gel technique in evaluation of direct antiglobulin test
    Das, Sudipta S.
    Chaudhary, Rajendra
    Khetan, Dheeraj
    HEMATOLOGY, 2007, 12 (02) : 175 - 178
  • [2] A comparison of conventional tube technique and gel technique in evaluation of direct antiglobulin test
    Khetan, D.
    Chaudhary, R.
    Das, S.
    VOX SANGUINIS, 2006, 91 : 117 - 117
  • [3] Comparison of conventional tube test technique and gel microcolumn assay for direct antiglobulin test: A large study
    Novaretti, MCZ
    Jens, E
    Pagliarini, T
    Bonifacio, SL
    Dorlhiac-Llacer, PE
    Chamone, DAF
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 2004, 18 (05) : 255 - 258
  • [4] Comparison between the conventional tube technique and the gel technique in direct antiglobulin tests
    Nathalang, O
    Chuansumrit, A
    Prayoonwiwat, W
    Siripoonya, P
    Sriphaisal, T
    VOX SANGUINIS, 1997, 72 (03) : 169 - 171
  • [5] The Significance of a Positive Direct Antiglobulin Test: Comparison Between Tube Agglutination Method and Two Microcolumn Methods
    Revelli, N.
    Manera, M.
    Erba, E.
    Mantovani, R.
    Scognamiglio, S.
    Renna, G.
    Parisi, R.
    Barcellini, W.
    Villa, M. A.
    Marconi, M.
    TRANSFUSION, 2009, 49 : 142A - 142A
  • [6] COMPARISON OF GEL TEST AND CONVENTIONAL TUBE TEST FOR ANTIBODY DETECTION AND TITRATION IN D-NEGATIVE PREGNANT WOMEN
    Marwaha, N.
    Thakur, M. K.
    Thakral, B.
    Saluja, K.
    Saha, S. C.
    VOX SANGUINIS, 2012, 103 : 232 - 233
  • [7] WEAK FALSE POSITIVE DIRECT ANTIGLOBULIN-TEST REACTIONS WITH POLYSPECIFIC ANTIGLOBULIN REAGENTS - LACK OF CORRELATION WITH RED-BLOOD-CELL-BOUND C3D
    NASONGKLA, M
    HUMMERT, J
    CHAPLIN, H
    TRANSFUSION, 1982, 22 (04) : 273 - 275
  • [8] Comparison of conventional tube test with diamed gel microcolumn assay for anti-D titration
    Novaretti, MCZ
    Jens, E
    Pagliarini, T
    Bonifácio, SL
    Dorlhiac-Llacer, PE
    Chamone, DAF
    CLINICAL AND LABORATORY HAEMATOLOGY, 2003, 25 (05): : 311 - 315
  • [9] Anti-IgG Gel Microcolumn Is Comparable to LISS Antiglobulin Test Tube Method for Compatibility Testing
    Shirey, R. S.
    Kim, Y.
    Cai, W.
    Tobian, A.
    Ness, P. M.
    King, K. E.
    TRANSFUSION, 2010, 50 : 172A - 173A
  • [10] Blood group antibody detection: Comparison of a novel acrylamide gel microtube test with a sensitive test tube-based method.
    Blackall, D
    Colwell, Y
    Ellerby, D
    BLOOD, 1997, 90 (10) : 3283 - 3283