Machine Learning Techniques for Soil Characterization Using Cone Penetration Test Data

被引:7
|
作者
Chala, Ayele Tesema [1 ]
Ray, Richard P. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Szecheny Istvan Univ, Fac Architecture Civil & Transport Sci, Struct & Geotech Engn Dept, Egyet Ter 1, H-9026 Gyor, Hungary
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 14期
关键词
shear wave velocity; cone penetration test; machine learning; Random Forests; support vector machine; decision trees; eXtreme gradient boosting; regression; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; LOMA-PRIETA EARTHQUAKE; SHEAR-WAVE VELOCITY; CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM; PREDICTION; REGRESSION; MODELS;
D O I
10.3390/app13148286
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Seismic response assessment requires reliable information about subsurface conditions, including soil shear wave velocity (V-s). To properly assess seismic response, engineers need accurate information about V-s, an essential parameter for evaluating the propagation of seismic waves. However, measuring V-s is generally challenging due to the complex and time-consuming nature of field and laboratory tests. This study aims to predict V-s using machine learning (ML) algorithms from cone penetration test (CPT) data. The study utilized four ML algorithms, namely Random Forests (RFs), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Trees (DT), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), to predict V-s. These ML models were trained on 70% of the datasets, while their efficiency and generalization ability were assessed on the remaining 30%. The hyperparameters for each ML model were fine-tuned through Bayesian optimization with k-fold cross-validation techniques. The performance of each ML model was evaluated using eight different metrics, including root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), coefficient of determination (R-2), performance index (PI), scatter index (SI), A10-I, and U-95. The results demonstrated that the RF model consistently performed well across all metrics. It achieved high accuracy and the lowest level of errors, indicating superior accuracy and precision in predicting V-s. The SVM and XGBoost models also exhibited strong performance, with slightly higher error metrics compared with the RF model. However, the DT model performed poorly, with higher error rates and uncertainty in predicting V-s. Based on these results, we can conclude that the RF model is highly effective at accurately predicting V-s using CPT data with minimal input features.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Streamflow Data Infilling Using Machine Learning Techniques with Gamma Test
    Dahmani, Saad
    Latif, Sarmad Dashti
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2024, 38 (02) : 701 - 716
  • [22] Site variability analysis using cone penetration test data
    Salgado, Rodrigo
    Ganju, Eshan
    Prezzi, Monica
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2019, 105 : 37 - 50
  • [23] Cone penetration test-based assessment of liquefaction potential using machine and hybrid learning approaches
    Khatti, Jitendra
    Fissha, Yewuhalashet
    Grover, Kamaldeep Singh
    Ikeda, Hajime
    Toriya, Hisatoshi
    Adachi, Tsuyoshi
    Kawamura, Youhei
    MULTISCALE AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY MODELING EXPERIMENTS AND DESIGN, 2024, 7 (04) : 3841 - 3864
  • [24] Cone penetration test in assessment of soil stiffness
    Tschuschke, Wojciech
    Kumor, Maciej Kordian
    Walczak, Magdalena
    Tschuschke, Marcin
    GEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY, 2015, 59 (02): : 419 - 425
  • [25] SOIL CLASSIFICATION BY THE CONE PENETRATION TEST - DISCUSSION
    JEFFERIES, MG
    DAVIES, MP
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 28 (01) : 173 - 176
  • [26] Generation and evaluation of synthetic cone penetration test (CPT) data using various spatial interpolation techniques
    Rahman, Md Habibur
    Abu-Farsakh, Murad Y.
    Jafari, Navid
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 58 (02) : 224 - 237
  • [27] Machine Learning Models to Evaluate the Load-Settlement Behavior of Piles from Cone Penetration Test Data
    Abu-Farsakh, Murad Y.
    Shoaib, Mohammad Moontakim
    GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 42 (05) : 3433 - 3449
  • [28] Computerized Cone Penetration Test for Soil Classification
    Abu-Farsakh, Murad Y.
    Zhang, Zhongjie
    Tumay, Mehmet
    Morvant, Mark
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2008, (2053) : 47 - 64
  • [29] A smarter approach to liquefaction risk: harnessing dynamic cone penetration test data and machine learning for safer infrastructure
    Singh, Shubhendu Vikram
    Ghani, Sufyan
    FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 10
  • [30] Determination of Thermal Conductivity of Soil Using Standard Cone Penetration Test
    Lines, Scott
    Williams, David J.
    Galindo-Torres, Sergio A.
    2017 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES ON CLEAN ENERGY RESEARCH (ICACER 2017), 2017, 118 : 172 - 178