Evaluating the Impact of Hazard Information on Fieldworkers' Safety Risk Perception

被引:0
|
作者
Ibrahim, Abdullahi [1 ]
Nnaji, Chukwuma [1 ]
Namian, Mostafa [2 ]
Shakouri, Mahmoud [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Construct Sci, 101 Coke Bldg, College Stn, TX 77840 USA
[2] East Carolina Univ, Dept Construct Management, East 5th St, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Construct Management, 1584 Campus Delivery, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
Risk perception; Safety risk assessment; Dynamic environment; Fieldworkers; OSHA fatal four; CONSTRUCTION; RELIABILITY; PASSENGERS; RECOGNITION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-14061
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Construction is a hazardous industry due to the dynamic nature of the work environment. However, limited studies have investigated how the introduction of additional hazards affects construction fieldworkers' perception of safety risks. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the influence of varying levels of hazard information on fieldworkers' safety risk perception (SRP) for the OSHA "fatal four" hazards. A sample of 181 fieldworkers rated the severity and frequency of safety incidents for five construction work scenarios. The study found that as new hazards were introduced in the work scenarios, the fieldworkers had a significant change in their perception of risks for about 71% of the accident causes. They were able to assess safety risks related to slip, trip, fall; struck-by; caught-in or -between; electrocution; stepping on an object; fall to a lower level; and trapped-in by collapsing. However, they failed to perceive the risk of increasing the number of workers in a hazardous work environment, indicating that workers focus on the severity of the occurrence of accidents and do not pay attention to the workers present on the scene. This study provides new insight into the role of varying degrees of hazard information in situational awareness and highlights the need for additional research at the intersection of worker exposure and situational awareness. Additionally, results from the study could inform the development of safety training to enhance workplace safety.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Wind hazard risk perception An experimental test
    Ewing, Bradley T.
    Kruse, Jamie B.
    Thompson, Mark A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS, EXPERIMENTAL METHODS, 2007, 8 : 395 - 406
  • [22] Risk Perception in a Multi-Hazard Environment
    Sullivan-Wiley, Kira A.
    Gianotti, Anne G. Short
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 97 : 138 - 152
  • [23] Effects of training and experience on perception of hazard and risk
    Duffy, VG
    ERGONOMICS, 2003, 46 (1-3) : 114 - 125
  • [24] The impact of safety climate on risk perception on Norwegian and Danish production platforms
    Rasmussen, H. B.
    Tharaldsen, J. E.
    ADVANCES IN SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2012, : 1833 - 1839
  • [25] Impact of risk attitudes and perception on game theoretic driving interactions and safety
    Arbis, David
    Dixit, Vinayak V.
    Rashidi, Taha Hossein
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2016, 94 : 135 - 142
  • [26] Evaluating and managing safety barriers in major hazard plants
    Duijm, NJ
    Andersen, HB
    Hale, A
    Goossens, L
    Hourtolou, D
    PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOL 1- 6, 2004, : 110 - 115
  • [27] A preliminary evaluation of the impact of local accident information on the public perception of road safety
    Zheng, Yunan
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2007, 92 (09) : 1170 - 1182
  • [28] Development of a Surrogate Safety Measure for Evaluating Rear-End Collision Risk Perception
    Wang, Wenxuan
    Zhang, Lexing
    Yan, Bo
    Cheng, Yanqiu
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2025,
  • [29] EVALUATING THE BURST HAZARD RISK IN A MINE DEVELOPMENT
    SHEMYAKIN, EI
    KURLENYA, MV
    KULAKOV, GI
    SOVIET MINING SCIENCE USSR, 1985, 21 (02): : 168 - 170
  • [30] Information seeking and workplace safety: A field application of the risk perception attitude framework
    Real, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2008, 36 (03) : 339 - 359