Review Indications, outcomes, and complications of neoumbilical reconstruction: A systematic review

被引:4
|
作者
Guiotto, M. [1 ]
Oranges, C. M. [2 ]
Cherubino, M. [3 ]
Maruccia, M. [4 ]
Tedeschi, P. [4 ]
Kalbermatten, D. F. [2 ]
Raffoul, W. [1 ]
di Summa, P. G. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne UNIL, Ctr Hosp Univ Vaudois CHUV, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Hop Univ Geneve HUG, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Osped Circolo Varese, Microsurg & Hand Surg Unit, Plast & Reconstruct Surg, ASST Settelaghi, Varese, Italy
[4] Univ Bari, Dept Emergency & Organ Transplantat, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Piazza Giulio Cesare, I-70124 Bari, Italy
[5] Univ Lausanne UNIL, Univ Hosp Lausanne CHUV, Dept Plast & Hand Surg, Rue Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Neoumbilicoplasty; Umbiliconeoplasty; Umbilical; reconstruction; Omphalectomy; Navel reconstruction; UMBILICUS RECONSTRUCTION; UMBILICOPLASTY; ABDOMINOPLASTY; PLICATION; EXCISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2023.10.094
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and objectives: Neoumbilicoplasty aims to reconstruct an aesthetically pleasing new umbilicus following agenesis, malignancy, anatomical distortion, or umbilicus loss. Despite the wide variety of surgical techniques described, literature is scarce when it comes to standardized categorization of these as well as the clear definition of patients' selections, specific indications, final outcomes, and possible complications. According to available literature, this work aims to evaluate different surgical approaches, and correlate them to specific surgical needs, to simplify the surgical choice and patient management.Methods: A systematic review was performed in December 2020 in PubMed, Web of Science, and MedLine Ovid databases according to the PRISMA guidelines. Results: A total of 41 studies and 588 patients were finally included. On the basis of the evidence of the literature collected, we divided the studies into four groups according to the neoumbilicoplasty techniques: single suture or purse-string suture, single flap, multiple flap, and skin graft. Patients' surgical comorbidities, neoumbilicoplasty indications, and aesthetic and surgical outcomes were investigated. Direct suture and single and multiple flap techniques assured overall, satisfactory cosmetic outcomes with a low rate of surgical complications.Whereas suture-only techniques were chosen mostly by general surgeons/urologists in laparo- scopic surgery, the single flap was the preferred method to reconstruct the umbilicus in open abdominal surgery or combined abdominoplasty with herniorrhaphy. Multiple flap and skin grafts were adopted in abdominoplasty-related umbilicus reconstruction, although the latter option showed impactful aesthetic and surgical complications. Conclusions: Umbilicoplasty can assure generally pleasant aesthetic outcomes with relatively low complication rates. Indications for specific techniques correspond to different patient populations and surgical scenarios.(c) 2023 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creative- commons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 98
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Complications of Reconstruction and Amputation for Type IIIB and IIIC Fractures of the Tibia
    Saddawi-Konefka, Daniel
    Kim, Hyungjin Myra
    Chung, Kevin C.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 122 (06) : 1796 - 1805
  • [22] Completion Pancreatectomy. Indications and Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    Vouros, Dimitrios
    Bramis, Konstantinos
    Alexakis, Nikolaos
    Kotsarinis, Vasileios
    Antonakis, Pantelis
    Memos, Nikolaos
    Konstadoulakis, Manousos
    Toutouzas, Konstantinos
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2023, 89 (12) : 6134 - 6146
  • [23] A Systematic Review of Canine Cystectomy: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes
    Hildebrandt, Isabella
    Culp, William T. N.
    Griffin, Maureen A.
    ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (18):
  • [24] Outcomes and Complications of Pediatric Cranioplasty: A Systematic Review
    Abu-Ghname, Amjed
    Banuelos, Joseph
    Oliver, Jeremie D.
    Vyas, Krishna
    Daniels, David
    Sharaf, Basel
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 144 (03) : 433E - 443E
  • [25] Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for hydrocephalus: A review of indications, outcomes, and complications
    Moorthy, Ranjith K.
    Rajshekhar, Vedantam
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2011, 59 (06) : 848 - 854
  • [26] Vitrectomy for diabetic retinopathy: A review of indications, techniques, outcomes, and complications
    Patel, Nimesh C.
    Hsieh, Yi-Ting
    Yang, Chung-May
    Berrocal, Maria H.
    Dhawahir-Scala, Felipe
    Ruamviboonsuk, Paisan
    Pappuru, Rajeev Reddy
    Dave, Vivek Pravin
    TAIWAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 14 (04) : 519 - 530
  • [27] Glenohumeral arthrodesis outcomes and complications: a systematic review
    Adu-Kwarteng, Kwabena
    Cabell, Grant H.
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Amanah, Alaowei Y.
    Levin, Jay M.
    Lassiter, Tally E.
    Boachie-Adjei, Yaw D.
    Klifto, Christopher S.
    Anakwenze, Oke
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2024, 33 (06) : 1418 - 1424
  • [28] The Hip Labrum Reconstruction: Indications and Outcomesan Updated Systematic Review
    Al Mana, Latifah
    Coughlin, Ryan P.
    Desai, Veeral
    Simunovic, Nicole
    Duong, Andrew
    Ayeni, Olufemi R.
    CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (02) : 156 - 165
  • [29] Outcomes in Hybrid Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Bonetti, Mario Alessandri
    Carbonaro, Riccardo
    Borelli, Francesco
    Amendola, Francesco
    Cottone, Giuseppe
    Mazzocconi, Luca
    Mastroiacovo, Alessandro
    Zingaretti, Nicola
    Parodi, Pier Camillo
    Vaienti, Luca
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (09):
  • [30] Outcomes of Visceral Arterial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    D'Souza, Rovan Evan
    Girish, Girish
    D'Souza, Preethy
    Lewis, Melissa Glenda
    Renjith, Vishnu
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 56 (03) : 290 - 297