A Comparative Study on the Efficiency between Global Space Companies and Domestic Companies by using DEA-SBM

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Dong-Hyeon [1 ]
Choi, Sang-Ok [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Program Sci & Technol Studies, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Korea Aerosp Ind Ltd, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Korea Univ, Dept Publ Adm, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
DEA-SBM; Efficiency; Constant Return to Scale; Variable Return to Scale;
D O I
10.5139/JKSAS.2023.51.11.819
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The growth of the space industry has accelerated in recent years, and countries around the world are promoting the development of the space industry with a focus on private companies. Korea is also preparing policies to nurture the space industry as a future leading industry. However, as the space industry ecosystem led by the private sector is still under development, systematic research on the management efficiency analysis of space companies is insufficient. This study aimed to measure the efficiency of space companies using the data envelopment analysis (DEA) method on 53 major space companies around the world, and to derive efficiency improvement measures and policy implications through a comparative analysis of the management efficiency between global space companies and domestic space companies. As a result of the analysis for efficiency improvement, total assets and the number of employees were judged to be relatively important factors for efficiency improvement. The results of this study are expected to be used as a reference for the formulation of detailed policies for the private-led space industrialization of the Korean government.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 828
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The efficiency of Jordan insurance companies and its determinants using DEA, slacks, and logit models
    Jaloudi, Mutasem Mahmoud
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2019, 26 (01): : 153 - 166
  • [22] Measuring the Efficiency of Public Road Transport Companies in the Slovak Republic Using DEA and SFA
    Kral, Pavol
    Rohacova, Viera
    STATISTIKA-STATISTICS AND ECONOMY JOURNAL, 2013, 93 (02) : 76 - 85
  • [23] Assessment of intellectual capital efficiency in China transportation equipment manufacturing companies: using DEA
    Hu, Yanjie
    Yang, Lanxia
    ICFCSE 2011: 2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE COMPUTER SUPPORTED EDUCATION, VOL 1, 2011, : 334 - 337
  • [24] The Study of Financing Efficiency about Listed Companies in Inner Mongolia Based on DEA Method
    Yan, Haokun
    Zhao, Honghong
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR RISK ANALYSIS AND CRISIS RESPONSE, 2014, 102 : 335 - 338
  • [25] A study on the operational and competitive efficiency of National Oil Companies using two-stage network DEA model
    Jung, Sungwook
    Shin, Jaeho
    Kim, Changhee
    OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2024, : 269 - 283
  • [26] A Comparative Study on Financing Efficiency of Media Companies Listed in China and America
    Zhou, Zihan
    Lan, Yijia
    Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 2024, 9 (01)
  • [27] Evaluating the use of Facebook among Mexican and global companies: A comparative study
    Zeler, Ileana
    Oliveira, Andrea
    Costa, Lluis
    CATALAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION & CULTURAL STUDIES, 2022, 14 (01) : 41 - 56
  • [28] Evaluating the technical efficiency of Saudi Arabian telecommunications companies using window DEA and AHP techniques
    Abdel-Halim, Amr
    Al Khars, Mohammed
    Alnasser, Ahmad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AND MIDDLE EASTERN FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 16 (06) : 1306 - 1325
  • [29] Measuring the Eco-efficiency of Brazilian Energy Companies using DEA and Directional Distance Function
    Goyannes Gusmao Caiado, Rodrigo
    Caetano Heymann, Mozart
    Luis Rey da Silveira, Celso
    Angulo Meza, Lidia
    Luiz Goncalves Quelhas, Osvaldo
    IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS, 2020, 18 (11) : 1844 - 1852
  • [30] How do CEOs communicate on Twitter? A comparative study between Fortune 200 companies and top startup companies
    Yue, Cen April
    Thelen, Patrick
    Robinson, Katy
    Men, Linjuan Rita
    CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 24 (03) : 532 - 552