Conservative Kidney Management: When, Why, and For Whom?

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Kelly Chenlei [1 ,2 ]
Brown, Mark Ashley [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, St George Hosp, Renal Dept, Sydney, Australia
[2] 50 Montgomery St,Suite 1, Kogarah, NSW 2217, Australia
关键词
Shared decision making; kidney failure; end stage kidney disease; conservative kidney management; kidney supportive care; palliative care; STAGE RENAL-DISEASE; OF-LIFE; PALLIATIVE CARE; COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL; STARTING DIALYSIS; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; DECISION-MAKING; OLDER PATIENTS; CKD; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.semnephrol.2023.151395
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Deciding between dialysis and conservative kidney management (CKM) in an elderly or seriously ill per-son with kidney failure is complex and requires shared decision making. Patients and families look to their nephrolo-gist to provide an individualized recommendation that aligns with patient-centered goals. For a balanced and considered decision to be made, dialysis should not be the default and nephrologists need to be familiar with rele-vant prognostic information including survival, symptom burden, functional trajectory, and quality of life with dialysis and with CKM. CKM is a holistic, proactive, and multidisciplinary treatment for kidney failure. For some elderly comorbid patients, CKM improves symptom burden and aligns with quality-of-life goals, with modest or no loss of longevity. CKM can be provided by a nephrologist alone but ideally is managed through partnership with a dedi-cated supportive or palliative care service embedded within the nephrology practice. Treatment decisions are best discussed early in the disease trajectory and occur over many consultations, and nephrologists should be upskilled in communication to better support patients and families in these important conversations. Nephrologists should remain actively involved in their patients' care through to end-of-life care. Semin Nephrol 43:151395 & COPY; 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DICTIONARIES, NEW AND OLD - WHO PLAGIARIZES WHOM, WHY AND WHEN
    BURCHFIELD, R
    ENCOUNTER, 1984, 63 (03): : 10 - 19
  • [32] PAD screening: why? whom? when? how? - a systematic review
    Kieback, Arne G.
    Gaehwiler, Roman
    Thalhammer, Christoph
    VASA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 50 (02) : 85 - 91
  • [33] Prone position in ARDS patients: why, when, how and for whom
    Claude Guérin
    Richard K. Albert
    Jeremy Beitler
    Luciano Gattinoni
    Samir Jaber
    John J. Marini
    Laveena Munshi
    Laurent Papazian
    Antonio Pesenti
    Antoine Vieillard-Baron
    Jordi Mancebo
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2020, 46 : 2385 - 2396
  • [34] Vaccination Against FSME: When, Whom, Why – Practical Questions
    Kaiser R.
    Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin, 2022, 98 (3): : 106 - 111
  • [35] Treatment of osteoporosis: why, whom, when and how to treat - In reply
    Seeman, E
    Eisman, JA
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2004, 181 (05) : 287 - 288
  • [36] Hospice Care in Conservative Kidney Management
    Bursic, Alexandra E.
    Schell, Jane O.
    SEMINARS IN NEPHROLOGY, 2023, 43 (01)
  • [37] The Coming Out Experiences of Gifted, LGBTQ Students: When, to Whom, and Why Not?
    Tuite, Jo
    Rubenstein, Lisa DaVia
    Salloum, Serena J.
    JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED, 2021, 44 (04) : 366 - 397
  • [38] When, why and for whom there is a relationship between physical activity and menopause symptoms
    McAndrew, Lisa M.
    Napolitano, Melissa A.
    Albrecht, Anna
    Farrell, Nancy C.
    Marcus, Bess H.
    Whiteley, Jessica A.
    MATURITAS, 2009, 64 (02) : 119 - 125
  • [39] Exploring openness in data and science: What is open, to whom, when, and why?
    Pasquetto, Irene V.
    Sands, Ashley E.
    Borgman, Christine L.
    Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 52 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [40] The art (and science) of seduction: Why, when, and for whom seductive details matter
    Alexander, Patricia A.
    APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 33 (01) : 142 - 148