共 50 条
From numerical to heterogeneous linguistic best-worst method: Impacts of personalized individual semantics on consistency and consensus
被引:13
|作者:
Zhang, Hengjie
[1
,4
]
Wang, Xiaomin
[1
]
Xu, Weijun
[2
]
Dong, Yucheng
[3
]
机构:
[1] Hohai Univ, Business Sch, Nanjing 211100, Peoples R China
[2] North Minzu Univ, Sch Business, Yinchuan 750001, Ningxia, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
[4] Jiangsu Prov Collaborat Innovat Ctr World Water Va, Nanjing 211100, Peoples R China
基金:
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词:
Group decision making;
Best-worst method;
Personalized individual semantics;
Consistency;
Consensus;
Heterogeneous linguistic information;
GROUP DECISION-MAKING;
PREFERENCE RELATIONS;
MINIMUM ADJUSTMENT;
FEEDBACK MECHANISM;
TERM SETS;
SELECTION;
MODEL;
COST;
METHODOLOGIES;
COLLECTION;
D O I:
10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105495
中图分类号:
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号:
0812 ;
摘要:
This paper investigates the impacts of personalized individual semantics (PIS) on consistency and consensus in Best-Worst method (BWM) with heterogeneous linguistic preference information. Firstly, a PIS driven consistency measurement and information transformation method is presented to analyze the consistency level of linguistic preference information (i.e., best-to-others and others-to-worst vectors) of each decision maker, and this is conducted by maximizing the consistency level of additive preference relation that converted from linguistic preference information via personalized numerical scales. Secondly, a PIS driven maximum consensus optimization model within the BWM framework is designed to yield the maximum consensus level among the additive preference relations generated from heterogeneous linguistic preference information by means of personalized numerical scales. Thirdly, a PIS-based heterogeneous linguistic consensus reaching process is put forward to promote the consensus establishment among decision makers. Finally, the validity of the proposed BWM framework is verified by a case study, a sensitive analysis, and a comparison analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文