Comparison of the prediction accuracy of machine learning algorithms in crosslinguistic vowel classification

被引:9
|
作者
Georgiou, Georgios P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nicosia, Dept Languages & Literature, Nicosia, Cyprus
[2] Univ Nicosia, Phonet Lab, Nicosia, Cyprus
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2023年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
NEURAL-NETWORKS; PERCEPTION; LISTENERS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-42818-3
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Machine learning algorithms can be used for the prediction of nonnative sound classification based on crosslinguistic acoustic similarity. To date, very few linguistic studies have compared the classification accuracy of different algorithms. This study aims to assess how well machines align with human speech perception by assessing the ability of three machine learning algorithms, namely, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), decision tree (C5.0), and neural network (NNET), to predict the classification of second language (L2) sounds in terms of first language (L1) categories. The models were trained using the first three formants and duration of L1 vowels and fed with the same acoustic features of L2 vowels. To validate their accuracy, adult L2 speakers completed a perceptual classification task. The results indicated that NNET predicted with success the classification of all L2 vowels with the highest proportion in terms of L1 categories, while LDA and C5.0 missed only one vowel each. Furthermore, NNET exhibited superior accuracy in predicting the full range of above chance responses, followed closely by LDA. C5.0 did not meet the anticipated performance levels. The findings can hold significant implications for advancing both the theoretical and practical frameworks of speech acquisition.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms and Obtaining Highest Accuracy for Prediction of Diabetes in Women
    Agarwal, Arushi
    Saxena, Ankur
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING FOR SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT (INDIACOM), 2019, : 686 - 690
  • [42] Comparative evaluation of three machine learning algorithms on improving orbit prediction accuracy
    Hao Peng
    Xiaoli Bai
    Astrodynamics, 2019, 3 : 325 - 343
  • [43] Comparative evaluation of three machine learning algorithms on improving orbit prediction accuracy
    Peng, Hao
    Bai, Xiaoli
    ASTRODYNAMICS, 2019, 3 (04) : 325 - 343
  • [44] A Comparison of Different Machine Learning Algorithms for Automatic Classification of Sonar Targets
    Berg, Henrik
    Hjelmervik, Karl Thomas
    Stender, Dan Henrik Sekse
    Sastad, Tale Solberg
    OCEANS 2016 MTS/IEEE MONTEREY, 2016,
  • [45] Comparison of machine learning algorithms for the radiomic classification of gastric subepithelial tumors
    Jeong, Woo Kyoung
    Lee, Jeong Hyun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [46] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Sentiment Classification on Fake News Detection
    Mahmud, Yuzi
    Shaeeali, Noor Sakinah
    Mutalib, Sofianita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 12 (10) : 658 - 665
  • [47] A Comparison of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of Communications Network Traffic
    Perera, Pramitha
    Tian, Yu-Chu
    Fidge, Colin
    Kelly, Wayne
    NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING, ICONIP 2017, PT I, 2017, 10634 : 445 - 454
  • [48] A comparison of machine learning algorithms in the classification of beef steers finished in feedlot
    Lopes, Lucas S.
    Baes, Christine F.
    Tulpan, Dan
    Chardulo, Luis Artur Loyola
    Machado Neto, Otavio
    Baldassini, Welder Angelo
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 : 126 - 126
  • [49] Comparison of Machine Learning Classification and Clustering Algorithms for TV Commercials Detection
    Abdelfattah, Eman
    Joshi, Shreehar
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 116741 - 116751
  • [50] Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification: an overview
    Baldi, P
    Brunak, S
    Chauvin, Y
    Andersen, CAF
    Nielsen, H
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2000, 16 (05) : 412 - 424