Systematic AI Support for Decision-Making in the Healthcare Sector: Obstacles and Success Factors

被引:12
|
作者
Bertl, Markus [1 ]
Ross, Peeter [1 ]
Draheim, Dirk [2 ]
机构
[1] Tallinn Univ Technol, Dept Hlth Technol, Akad tee 15a, EE-12616 Tallinn, Estonia
[2] Tallinn Univ Technol, Dept Software Sci, Informat Syst Grp, Akad tee 15a, EE-12616 Tallinn, Estonia
关键词
Decision support systems; Healthcare information systems; Health informatics; Delivery of health care; Artificial intelligence (AI); Machine learning (ML); Decision-making; GAIA-X; e-health; Digital health; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; IMPLEMENTATION; ACCEPTANCE; SEEKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100748
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Currently, health care is expert-centric, especially with regard to decision-making. Innovations such as artificial intelligence (AI) or interconnected electronic health records (EHRs) suffer from low adoption rates. In the rare cases of technically successful implementation, they often result in inefficient or error-prone processes. Aim & Methods: This paper explores the state of the art in AI-based digital decision support systems (DDSSs). To overcome the low adoption rates, we propose a systematic strategy for bringing DDSS research into clinical practice based on a design science approach. DDSSs can transform health care to be more innovative, patientcentric, accurate and efficient. We contribute by providing a framework for the successful development, evaluation and analysis of systems for AI-based decision-making. This framework is then evaluated using focus group interviews. Results: Centred around our framework, we define a systematic approach for the use of AI in health care. Our systematic AI support approach highlights essential perspectives on DDSSs for systematic development and analysis. The aim is to develop and promote robust and optimal practices for clinical investigation and evaluation of DDSS in order to encourage their adoption rates. The framework contains the following dimensions: disease, data, technology, user groups, validation, decision and maturity. Conclusion: DDSSs focusing on only one framework dimension are generally not successful; therefore, we propose to consider each framework dimension during analysis, design, implementation and evaluation so as to raise the number of DDSSs used in clinical practice. Public Interest Summary: The digital transformation of the healthcare sector creates the potential for the sector to be more accurate, efficient and patient-centric using AI, or so-called digital decision support systems. In this research, we explore why these systems are needed and how they can be successfully implemented in clinical practice. For this, we propose a systematic approach based on our conceptual framework. Against this background, we present our vision for further advancing these technologies. We see our systematic AI support as a primary driver, with the possibility to facilitate the much-needed breakthrough of decision support systems in health care.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Contingent Effects of Decision-making and Customer Centricity on Public-Sector Innovation Success
    Hashim, Nik Mohd Hazrul Nik
    Ann, Yap Hock
    Ansary, Amin
    Xavier, John Antony
    JOURNAL OF NONPROFIT & PUBLIC SECTOR MARKETING, 2022, 34 (01) : 36 - 70
  • [42] Orientation and Decision-Making for Soccer Based on Sports Analytics and AI: A Systematic Review
    Pu, Zhiqiang
    Pan, Yi
    Wang, Shijie
    Liu, Boyin
    Chen, Min
    Ma, Hao
    Cui, Yixiong
    IEEE-CAA JOURNAL OF AUTOMATICA SINICA, 2024, 11 (01) : 37 - 57
  • [43] Orientation and Decision-Making for Soccer Based on Sports Analytics and AI:A Systematic Review
    Zhiqiang Pu
    Yi Pan
    Shijie Wang
    Boyin Liu
    Min Chen
    Hao Ma
    Yixiong Cui
    IEEE/CAAJournalofAutomaticaSinica, 2024, 11 (01) : 37 - 57
  • [44] Representation in participatory healthcare decision-making
    Moore, Emma L.
    Chandrasekaran, Lakshmi
    Sheldon-Wilson, Holly
    Scholtz, Janneke
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2022, 25 (04) : 1190 - 1191
  • [45] Value of Information for Healthcare Decision-Making
    Mala, Firdous Ahmad
    TECHNOMETRICS, 2024, 66 (04) : 677 - 678
  • [46] On the ethics of algorithmic decision-making in healthcare
    Grote, Thomas
    Berens, Philipp
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2020, 46 (03) : 205 - 211
  • [47] A Systematic Research about the Computer Game of Checkers Based on the Decision-making of AI
    Li Youru
    Liu Xueping
    Wang Yajie
    Xi Yuting
    2015 27TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC), 2015, : 6437 - 6442
  • [48] Assessment of Healthcare Decision-making Capacity
    Palmer, Barton W.
    Harmell, Alexandrea L.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 31 (06) : 530 - 540
  • [50] The management of bias and noise in public sector decision-making: experimental evidence from healthcare
    Belle, Nicola
    Cantarelli, Paola
    Wang, Sophie Y.
    PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024, 26 (11) : 3246 - 3269