Households' investments in socially responsible mutual funds?

被引:7
|
作者
Christiansen, Charlotte [1 ]
Jansson, Thomas [2 ]
Kallestrup-Lamb, Malene [1 ]
Noren, Vicke [2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Econ & Business Econ, CREATES, Fuglesangs 4, DK-8210 Aarhus V, Denmark
[2] Sveriges Riksbank, Res Div, S-10337 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Household finance; Portfolio choice; Retail investors; SRI investments; PERFORMANCE; ATTITUDES; MANAGERS; DRIVERS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.qref.2022.11.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We use a large administrative panel data set to study which characteristics are related to households' investments in socially responsible investing (SRI) mutual funds. To isolate financial and non-financial preferences for SRI investments, we distinguish between two types of SRI funds; ESG and charitable funds. We also analyze to what extent liquid wealth and age play a role in allocation of SRI funds. We find that participation in SRI funds is lower for young and retired investors. Moreover, we find that young adults are more likely to be ESG investors, while retired investors are more likely to participate in charitable funds. Further, liquid wealth is important for SRI participation but becomes less relevant once investors have sufficient liquid wealth. For the exposure to SRI funds, the overall picture is quite different as it is negatively related to wealth, income, risky share, and education. The relationship between investors' characteristics and the returns on their conventional fund portfolio are similar for conventional and SRI investors. Our analysis indicates that SRI investors might have non-financial objectives for their SRI investments. Finally, we find that, on average, SRI investors earn higher returns on their total fund portfolio compared to con-ventional investors.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 67
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Misconceptions about socially responsible investments
    Meunier, Luc
    Ohadi, Sima
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 373
  • [42] Socially responsible funds and market crises
    Nofsinger, John
    Varma, Abhishek
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2014, 48 : 180 - 193
  • [43] The Performance of European Socially Responsible Funds
    Maria Ceu Cortez
    Florinda Silva
    Nelson Areal
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2009, 87 : 573 - 588
  • [44] Socially responsible stock funds in Brazil
    Pinto, Dimas Hartz
    Lemme, Celso Funcia
    Pereira Camara Leal, Ricardo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2014, 10 (04) : 432 - 441
  • [45] The Performance of European Socially Responsible Funds
    Cortez, Maria Ceu
    Silva, Florinda
    Areal, Nelson
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2009, 87 (04) : 573 - 588
  • [46] Bond mutual funds and complex investments
    Natter M.
    Rohleder M.
    Schulte D.
    Wilkens M.
    Journal of Asset Management, 2017, 18 (6) : 433 - 456
  • [47] A fuzzy data envelopment analysis model for evaluating the efficiency of socially responsible and conventional mutual funds
    Baeza-Sampere, I.
    Coll-Serrano, V.
    M'Zali, B.
    Mendez-Rodriguez, P.
    JOURNAL OF RISK, 2016, 19 (01): : 77 - 90
  • [48] Investing in socially responsible mutual funds: Proposal of non-financial ranking in Italian market
    Petrillo, Antonella
    De Felice, Fabio
    Garcia-Melon, Monica
    Perez-Gladish, Blanca
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2016, 37 : 541 - 555
  • [49] Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Performances: Application to SRI (Socially Responsible Investing) Mutual Funds
    Hwang, Joon Ho
    Kim, Dong Han
    Chun, Se-Hak
    FUTURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, PT 1, 2011, 184 : 200 - +
  • [50] Canadian Socially Responsible Investment Mutual Funds Performance Evaluation Using Data Envelopment Analysis
    Ayadi, Mohamed A.
    Ben Ghazi, Zouhour
    Chabchoub, Habib
    MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING IN FINANCE, INSURANCE AND INVESTMENT, 2015, : 77 - 133