Sustainable strategies for green supply chain within the platform economy consider subsidies and marketing efforts

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Weisi [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Yiting [1 ]
Luo, Rui [1 ]
Wang, Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Logist Res Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Sch Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 11期
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES; EMISSION REDUCTION; PRICING POLICIES; DECISIONS; AWARENESS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0292349
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
As consumers' green awareness continues to grow, the level of a product's eco-friendliness and the quality of its marketing have become significant factors in shaping consumers' purchasing decisions. The power structures within the supply chain, as well as corresponding government subsidy policies, are also key elements influencing sustainable strategies for the green supply chain. In a green supply chain comprising one manufacturer and one e-commerce platform, two sales models exist within the online e-commerce platforms: reselling and agency selling. This paper establishes and analyzes three distinct Stackelberg game models, namely: manufacturer-led model without subsidy (bm), manufacturer-led model with subsidy (sm), and platform-led model with subsidy (sp). The results are shown as follows, with the rise of consumers' environmental awareness, more consumers opt for green products, inspiring the manufacturer to increase its optimal greenness and platform to enhance its optimal marketing efforts level. Notably, government subsidies provide a significant stimulus. An increase in the green technology cost coefficient leads to a decline in the manufacturer's profits across all three modes. Intriguingly, the manufacturer's profits are always highest in the sp mode. As the marketing efforts cost coefficient increases, the platform's profits decrease in the bm and sm modes. In contrast, in the sp mode, the platform's profits increase rather than a decrease. The choice of mode primarily depends on the platform's marketing efforts cost coefficient. When this coefficient exceeds a threshold, the platform chooses the sp mode. However, due to the relatively low marketing efficiency in this scenario, the manufacturer prefers the sm mode. For the government, the sp mode involves agency selling, serves as an effective mechanism to redistribute subsidies, thereby yielding the maximum social welfare benefits. Management insights are provided for the manufacturer and platform managers to make decisions about the degree of greenness and marketing efforts level, along with insights for governments to optimize subsidy policies.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pricing Strategies of Dual-Channel Green Supply Chain Considering Government Subsidies and Blockchain Technology
    Fang, Qing
    Wang, Luyao
    E-BUSINESS: NEW CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR DIGITAL-ENABLED INTELLIGENT FUTURE, PT I, WHICEB 2024, 2024, 515 : 203 - 213
  • [32] Building a sustainable supply chain for the biobased economy
    Huttner, Jack
    Batchelor, Stephanie
    Industrial Biotechnology, 2014, 10 (04) : 251 - 255
  • [33] Green Technology Investment with Data-Driven Marketing and Government Subsidy in a Platform Supply Chain
    Li, Ke
    Dai, Gengxin
    Xia, Yanfei
    Mu, Zongyu
    Zhang, Guitao
    Shi, Yangyan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [34] Evaluating barriers and strategies to sustainable supply chain risk management in the context of an emerging economy
    Reshad, Aquib Irteza
    Biswas, Tasnia
    Agarwal, Renu
    Paul, Sanjoy Kumar
    Azeem, Abdullahil
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 32 (07) : 4315 - 4334
  • [35] IMPACT OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ON FIRMS' SUSTAINABLE PERFORMANCE: A CASE OF AN EMERGING ECONOMY
    Kato, Ahmed
    Manchidi, N. M.
    ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES, 2022, 10 (02): : 93 - 114
  • [36] An Analysis on Sustainable Supply Chain for Circular Economy
    Manavalan, E.
    Jayakrishna, K.
    SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING FOR GLOBAL CIRCULAR ECONOMY, 2019, 33 : 477 - 484
  • [37] Coordinating a Green Agri-Food Supply Chain with Revenue-Sharing Contracts Considering Retailers' Green Marketing Efforts
    Li Cui
    Guo, Siwei
    Zhang, Hao
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (04)
  • [38] Location Optimization Strategies for Corn Production and Distribution towards Sustainable Green Supply Chain
    Asha, Labiba Noshin
    Aragon, Lucy G.
    Dey, Arup
    Yodo, Nita
    LOGISTICS-BASEL, 2024, 8 (03):
  • [39] Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy beyond green growth and green economies
    Lorek, Sylvia
    Spangenberg, Joachim H.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 63 : 33 - 44
  • [40] Green supply chain management and sustainable performance: exploring the role of circular economy capability and green ambidexterity innovation
    Martinez-Falco, Javier
    Sanchez-Garcia, Eduardo
    Marco-Lajara, Bartolome
    Andreu, Rosario
    BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2024, 126 (11): : 3985 - 4011