Building Up Skin Models for Numerous Applications - from Two-Dimensional (2D) Monoculture to Three-Dimensional (3D) Multiculture

被引:2
|
作者
Piasek, Adrianna Maria [1 ]
Levkovych, Iryna [1 ]
Musolf, Paulina [1 ]
Chmielewska, Hanna [1 ]
Sciezynska, Aneta [2 ]
Sobiepanek, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Warsaw Univ Technol, Fac Chem, Chair Drug & Cosmet Biotechnol, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Med Univ Warsaw, Dept Histol & Embryol, Warsaw, Poland
来源
关键词
GROWTH-FACTOR; MAST-CELLS; EQUIVALENT; FIBROBLAST; SAFETY;
D O I
10.3791/65773
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Due to the complex structure and important functions of the skin, it is an interesting research model for the cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and medical industries. In the European Union, there has been a total ban on testing cosmetic products and their ingredients on animals. In the case of medicine and pharmaceuticals, this possibility is also constantly limited. In accordance with the 3Rs principle, it is becoming more and more common to test individual compounds as well as entire formulations on artificially created models. The cheapest and most widely used are the 2D models, which consist of a cell monolayer but do not reflect the real interactions between the cells in the tissue. Although the commercially available 3D models provide a better representation of the tissue, they are not used on a large scale. This is because they are expensive, the waiting time is quite long, and the available models are frequently limited to only those typically used. In order to move the conducted research to a higher level, we have optimized the procedures of various 3D skin model preparations. The described procedures are cheap and simple to prepare as they can be applied in numerous laboratories and by researchers with different experiences in cell culture.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Acquisition of Laparoscopic Skills in Three-Dimensional (3D) vs. Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopy
    Alaraimi, B.
    El Bakbak, W.
    Sarker, S.
    Makkiyah, S.
    Al-Marzouq, A.
    Goriparthi, R.
    Bouhelal, A.
    Quan, V.
    Patel, B.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 38 (11) : 2746 - 2752
  • [22] A Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Acquisition of Laparoscopic Skills in Three-Dimensional (3D) vs. Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopy
    B. Alaraimi
    W. El Bakbak
    S. Sarker
    S. Makkiyah
    A. Al-Marzouq
    R. Goriparthi
    A. Bouhelal
    V. Quan
    B. Patel
    World Journal of Surgery, 2014, 38 : 2746 - 2752
  • [23] The fabrication of ultrathin films and their gas separation performance from polymers of intrinsic microporosity with two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) chain conformations
    Benito, Javier
    Vidal, Julio
    Sanchez-Lainez, Javier
    Zornoza, Beatriz
    Tellez, Carlos
    Martin, Santiago
    Msayib, Kadhum J.
    Comesana-Gandara, Bibiana
    McKeown, Neil B.
    Coronas, Joaquin
    Gascon, Ignacio
    JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2019, 536 : 474 - 482
  • [24] Fusion of 2D and 3D data in three-dimensional face recognition
    Bronstein, AM
    Bronstein, MM
    Gordon, E
    Kimmel, R
    ICIP: 2004 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOLS 1- 5, 2004, : 87 - 90
  • [25] Two-dimensional (2D) versus three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for vaginal cuff closure by surgeons-in-training: a randomized controlled trial
    Mobolaji O. Ajao
    Christian R. Larsen
    Elmira Manoucheri
    Emily R. Goggins
    Maja T. Rask
    Mary K. B. Cox
    Avery Mushinski
    Xiangmei Gu
    Sarah L. Cohen
    Martin Rudnicki
    Jon I. Einarsson
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 1237 - 1243
  • [26] Testicular volumetry using a calliper, two-dimensional (2D)-, and three-dimensional (3D) sonography to determine Daily Sperm Output (DSO) in the stallion
    Pricking, S.
    Spilker, K.
    Martinsson, G.
    Burger, D.
    Bollwein, H.
    Sieme, H.
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2017, 52 : 41 - 41
  • [27] Three-dimensional (3D) system versus two-dimensional (2D) system for laparoscopic resection of adrenal tumors: a case-control study
    Rodriguez-Hermosa, Jose Ignacio
    Ranea, Alejandro
    Delisau, Olga
    Planellas-Gine, Pere
    Cornejo, Lidia
    Pujadas, Marcel
    Codony, Clara
    Girones, Jordi
    Codina-Cazador, Antoni
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2020, 405 (08) : 1163 - 1173
  • [28] Three-Dimensional (3D) Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study
    Giuseppe Currò
    Giuseppe La Malfa
    Antonio Caizzone
    Valentina Rampulla
    Giuseppe Navarra
    Obesity Surgery, 2015, 25 : 2120 - 2124
  • [29] Two-dimensional (2D) versus three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for vaginal cuff closure by surgeons-in-training: a randomized controlled trial
    Ajao, Mobolaji O.
    Larsen, Christian R.
    Manoucheri, Elmira
    Goggins, Emily R.
    Rask, Maja T.
    Cox, Mary K. B.
    Mushinski, Avery
    Gu, Xiangmei
    Cohen, Sarah L.
    Rudnicki, Martin
    Einarsson, Jon, I
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (03): : 1237 - 1243
  • [30] Three-Dimensional (3D) Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study
    Curro, Giuseppe
    La Malfa, Giuseppe
    Caizzone, Antonio
    Rampulla, Valentina
    Navarra, Giuseppe
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2015, 25 (11) : 2120 - 2124