Comparison of burst properties between FRB 20190520B and FRB 20121102A

被引:5
|
作者
Lyu, Fen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Liang, En-Wei [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Sci & Technol Museum, Astron Res Ctr, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Univ, Sch Phys Sci & Technol, Guangxi Key Lab Relativist Astrophys, Nanning 530004, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Shanghai Astron Observ, Nandan Rd 80, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Univ, Key Lab Modern Astron & Astrophys, Minist Educ, Nanjing 210093, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
radio continuum: transients; fast radio bursts; FAST RADIO-BURSTS; GIANT PULSES; MAGNETAR; MODEL;
D O I
10.1093/mnras/stad1271
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
A comparative analysis of the individual bursts between FRB 20190520B and FRB 20121102A is presented by compiling a sample of bursts in multiple wavelengths. It is found that the peak frequency (nu(p)) distribution of the bursts of FRB 20190520B illustrates four discrete peaks in similar to 1-6 GHz and their spectral width distribution can be fitted with a lognormal function peaking at 0.35 GHz. The discrete nu(p) distribution and the narrow-banded spectral feature are analogous to FRB 20121102A. The burst duration of FRB 20190520B in the rest frame averages to 10.72 ms, longer than that of FRB 20121102A by a factor 3. The specific energy (E-mu c) at 1.25 GHz of FRB 20190520B observed with the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Radio Telescope narrowly ranges in [0.4, 1] x 10(38) erg, different from the bimodal E-mu c distribution of FRB 20121102A. Assuming a Gaussian spectral profile of the bursts, our Monte Carlo simulation analysis suggests that a power law (PL) or a cut-off power-law (CPL) energy function can comparably reproduce the E-mu c distribution of FRB 20190520B. The derived energy function index of the PL model is 4.46 +/- 0.17, much steeper than that of FRB 20121102A (1.82(-0.30)(+0.10)). For the CPL model, we obtain an index of 0.47 and a cut-off energy of 7.4 x 10(37) erg. Regarding the predicted nu(p) distribution in 1-2 GHz, the CPL model is more preferred than the PL model. These results indicate that FRB 20190520B and FRB 20121102A share similar spectral properties, but their energy functions are intrinsically different.
引用
收藏
页码:5600 / 5607
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison between repeating bursts of FRB 121102 and giant pulses from Crab pulsar and its applications
    Lyu, Fen
    Meng, Yan-Zhi
    Tang, Zhen-Fan
    Li, Ye
    Wei, Jun-Jie
    Geng, Jin-Jun
    Lin, Lin
    Deng, Can-Min
    Wu, Xue-Feng
    FRONTIERS OF PHYSICS, 2021, 16 (02)
  • [32] A comparison between repeating bursts of FRB 121102 and giant pulses from Crab pulsar and its applications
    Fen Lyu
    Yan-Zhi Meng
    Zhen-Fan Tang
    Ye Li
    Jun-Jie Wei
    Jin-Jun Geng
    Lin Lin
    Can-Min Deng
    Xue-Feng Wu
    Frontiers of Physics, 2021, 16
  • [33] A comparison between repeating bursts of FRB 121102 and giant pulses from Crab pulsar and its applications
    Fen Lyu
    YanZhi Meng
    ZhenFan Tang
    Ye Li
    JunJie Wei
    JinJun Geng
    Lin Lin
    CanMin Deng
    XueFeng Wu
    Frontiers of Physics, 2021, 16 (02) : 203 - 209
  • [34] A Large-scale Magneto-ionic Fluctuation in the Local Environment of Periodic Fast Radio Burst Source FRB 20180916B
    Mckinven, R.
    Gaensler, B. M.
    Michilli, D.
    Masui, K.
    Kaspi, V. M.
    Bhardwaj, M.
    Cassanelli, T.
    Chawla, P.
    Dong, F.
    Fonseca, E.
    Leung, C.
    Li, D. Z.
    Ng, C.
    Patel, C.
    Petroff, E.
    Pearlman, A. B.
    Pleunis, Z.
    Rafiei-Ravandi, M.
    Rahman, M.
    Sand, K. R.
    Shin, K.
    Scholz, P.
    Stairs, I. H.
    Smith, K.
    Su, J.
    Tendulkar, S.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 950 (01):
  • [35] The northern cross fast radio burst project - II. Monitoring of repeating FRB 20180916B, 20181030A, 20200120E, and 20201124A
    Trudu, M.
    Pilia, M.
    Bernardi, G.
    Addis, A.
    Bianchi, G.
    Magro, A.
    Naldi, G.
    Pelliciari, D.
    Pupillo, G.
    Setti, G.
    Bortolotti, C.
    Casentini, C.
    Dallacasa, D.
    Gajjar, V
    Locatelli, N.
    Lulli, R.
    Maccaferri, G.
    Mattana, A.
    Michilli, D.
    Perini, F.
    Possenti, A.
    Roma, M.
    Schiaffino, M.
    Tavani, M.
    Verrecchia, F.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 513 (02) : 1858 - 1866
  • [36] A comparison between the chelating properties of some dihydroxamic acids, desferrioxamine B and acetohydroxamic acid
    Farkas, E
    Enyedy, ÉA
    Csóka, H
    POLYHEDRON, 1999, 18 (18) : 2391 - 2398
  • [37] Comparison of properties between Pr-Fe-B and Nd-Fe-B thick-film magnets applied to MEMS
    Nakano, Masaki
    Takeichi, Sho
    Yamaguchi, Takashi
    Takashima, Keisuke
    Yamashita, Akihiro
    Yanai, Takeshi
    Shinshi, Tadahiko
    Fukunaga, Hirotoshi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 2020, 59 (SE)
  • [38] Comparison of probiotic properties between free cells and encapsulated cells of Limosilactobacillus fermentum InaCC B1295
    Pato, Usman
    Yusuf, Yusmarini
    Riftyan, Emma
    Rossi, Evy
    Agrina
    AIMS AGRICULTURE AND FOOD, 2024, 9 (02): : 483 - 499
  • [39] A Comparison between B4C-TiB2-Al Composite and B4C-Al Composite on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties
    Lu Peng
    Yu Fang
    Ru Hongqiang
    MECHANICAL, MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, PTS 1-3, 2011, 66-68 : 255 - 259
  • [40] Comparison between B4C-ZrB2-Al Composite and B4C-Al Composite on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties
    Lu Peng
    MECHANICS, SOLID STATE AND ENGINEERING MATERIALS, 2011, 279 : 71 - 76