Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis

被引:1
|
作者
Heine, John [1 ]
Fowler, Erin E. E. [1 ]
Weinfurtner, R. Jared [2 ]
Hume, Emma [1 ]
Tworoger, Shelley S. [1 ]
机构
[1] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Canc Epidemiol, 12902 Bruce B Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Diagnost Imaging & Intervent Radiol, 12902 Bruce B Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CANCER RISK; MAMMOGRAPHY; SUSCEPTIBILITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-45402-x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Mammography shifted to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the US. An automated percentage of breast density (PD) technique designed for two-dimensional (2D) applications was evaluated with DBT using several breast cancer risk prediction measures: normalized-volumetric; dense volume; applied to the volume slices and averaged (slice-mean); and applied to synthetic 2D images. Volumetric measures were derived theoretically. PD was modeled as a function of compressed breast thickness (CBT). The mean and standard deviation of the pixel values were investigated. A matched case-control (CC) study (n=426 pairs) was evaluated. Odd ratios (ORs) were estimated with 95% confidence intervals. ORs were significant for PD: identical for volumetric and slice-mean measures [OR=1.43 (1.18, 1.72)] and [OR=1.44 (1.18, 1.75)] for synthetic images. A 2nd degree polynomial (concave-down) was used to model PD as a function of CBT: location of the maximum PD value was similar across CCs, occurring at 0.41xCBT, and PD was significant [OR=1.47 (1.21, 1.78)]. The means from the volume and synthetic images were also significant [ORs similar to 1.31 (1.09, 1.57)]. An alternative standardized 2D synthetic image was constructed, where each pixel value represents the percentage of breast density above its location. Several measures were significant and an alternative method for constructing a standardized 2D synthetic image was produced.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predicting Breast Density of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis from 2D Mammograms
    Yeh, Jinn-Yi
    Lin, Tu-Liang
    Chan, Siwa
    IETE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 2023, 69 (06) : 3132 - 3143
  • [22] Breast Cancer Screening Using Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging by Breast Density
    Stout, Natasha K.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Su, Yu-Ru
    Lee, Christoph I.
    Abraham, Linn
    Alagoz, Oguzhan
    de Koning, Harry J.
    Hampton, John M.
    Henderson, Louise
    Lowry, Kathryn P.
    Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.
    Onega, Tracy
    Schechter, Clyde B.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Stein, Sarah
    Trentham-Dietz, Amy
    van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T.
    Wernli, Karen J.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 184 (10) : 1222 - 1231
  • [23] Effect of Mammographic Screening Modality on Breast Density Assessment: Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Gastounioti, Aimilia
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Pantalone, Lauren
    Synnestvedt, Marie
    Kontos, Despina
    Conant, Emily F.
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 291 (02) : 319 - 326
  • [24] Deep-learning-enabled volumetric breast density estimation with digital breast tomosynthesis
    Ahluwalia, Vinayak S.
    Mankowski, Walter
    Pati, Sarthak
    Bakas, Spyridon
    Brooks, Ari
    Vachon, Celine M.
    Conant, Emily F.
    Gastounioti, Aimilia
    Kontos, Despina
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 82 (12)
  • [25] Advancing Volumetric Breast Density Segmentation: A Deep Learning Approach with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Doiphode, Nehal
    Ahluwalia, Vinayak S.
    Mankowski, Walter C.
    Cohen, Eric A.
    Pati, Sarthak
    Pantalone, Lauren
    Bakas, Spyridon
    Brooks, Ari
    Vachon, Celine M.
    Conant, Emily F.
    Gastounioti, Aimilia
    Kontos, Despina
    17TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON BREAST IMAGING, IWBI 2024, 2024, 13174
  • [26] Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Moseley, Tanya W.
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 59 (02): : 362 - 379
  • [27] Comparing Mammographic Density Assessed by Digital Breast Tomosynthesis or Digital Mammography: The Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium
    Tice, Jeffrey A.
    Gard, Charlotte C.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Joe, Bonnie N.
    Ho, Thao-Quyen H.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 302 (02) : 286 - 292
  • [28] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: an Overview
    Ekta Dhamija
    Malvika Gulati
    S. V. S. Deo
    Ajay Gogia
    Smriti Hari
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2021, 12 : 315 - 329
  • [29] The physics of digital breast tomosynthesis
    Mertelmeier, T.
    Radicke, M.
    Jerebko, A.
    Nanke, R.
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING-BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 2012, 57 : 222 - 222
  • [30] Basics of digital breast tomosynthesis
    Shah, Nadia
    de Paredes, Ellen Shaw
    APPLIED RADIOLOGY, 2014, 43 (03) : 17 - 20