Restaging of rectal cancer with hybrid positron emission tomography magnetic resonance imaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy

被引:0
|
作者
Tey, Jeremy [1 ,5 ]
Tan, Jarrod K. H. [2 ]
Tan, Ker-Kan [2 ]
Soon, Yu Yang [1 ]
Loi, Hoi Yin [3 ]
Mohamed, Jalila Sayed Adnan [4 ]
Bakulbhai, Padia Ankita [4 ]
Ang, Bertrand [4 ]
Liang, Thian Yee [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ, Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Surg, Div Colorectal Surg, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Radiol, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Natl Univ, Canc Inst, NUH Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Levels 8-10,5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Singapore
关键词
PET/MRI; preoperative chemotherapy; rectal cancer; staging; FDG PET/MRI; PHASE-II; SURGERY; PET/CT; MRI;
D O I
10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022378
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study determines the sensitivity and specificity of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) parameters in predicting treatment response in patients with localised rectal cancer who have undergone preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Method: Patients with stage I-III adenocarcinoma of the rectum planned for preoperative CRT followed by surgery were recruited. Patients had PET/ MRI scans at baseline and 6-8 weeks post-CRT. Functional MRI and PET parameters were assessed for their diagnostic accuracy for tumour regression grade (TRG). Nonparametric receiver operating characteristic analysis was employed to determine the area under the ROC curve (AUC), and the sensitivity and specificity of each quantile cut-off. Results: A total of 31 patients were recruited, of whom 20 completed study protocol. All patients included had mid or lower rectal tumours. There were 16 patients (80%) with node-positive disease at presentation. The median time to surgery was 75.5 days (range 52-106 days). Histopathological assessment revealed 20% good responders (TRG 1/2), and the remaining 80% of patients had a poor response (TRG 3/4). When predicting good responders, the AUC values for percent maximum thickness reduction and percent apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) change were 0.82 and 0.73, respectively. A maximum thickness reduction cut-off of >= 47% and a percent ADC change of >= 20% yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 75%/95% and 75%/73%, respectively. Conclusion: Parameters such as percent maximum thickness reduction and percent ADC change may be useful for predicting good responders in patients undergoing preoperative CRT for rectal cancer. Larger studies are warranted to establish the utility of PET/MRI in rectal cancer staging.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 295
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Restaging Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Before Surgery After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Park, Hyo Jung
    Jang, Jong Keon
    Park, Seong Ho
    Park, In Ja
    Kim, Jong Hoon
    Baek, Seunghee
    Hong, Yong Sang
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (02) : 259 - 262
  • [22] Imaging prostate cancer: An update on positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
    Bouchelouche K.
    Turkbey B.
    Choyke P.
    Capala J.
    Current Urology Reports, 2010, 11 (3) : 180 - 190
  • [23] The Value of Preoperative Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Node-Negative Endometrial Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Jeong-Yeol Park
    Jong Jin Lee
    Hyuck Jae Choi
    In Hye Song
    Chang Ohk Sung
    Hye Ok Kim
    Sun-Young Chae
    Young-Tak Kim
    Joo-Hyun Nam
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2017, 24 : 2303 - 2310
  • [24] Magnetic resonance imaging of rectal cancer: staging and restaging evaluation
    Moreno, Courtney C.
    Sullivan, Patrick S.
    Kalb, Bobby T.
    Tipton, Russell G.
    Hanley, Krisztina Z.
    Kitajima, Hiroumi D.
    Dixon, W. Thomas
    Votaw, John R.
    Oshinski, John N.
    Mittal, Pardeep K.
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2015, 40 (07): : 2613 - 2629
  • [25] The Value of Preoperative Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Node-Negative Endometrial Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Park, Jeong-Yeol
    Lee, Jong Jin
    Choi, Hyuck Jae
    Song, In Hye
    Sung, Chang Ohk
    Kim, Hye Ok
    Chae, Sun-Young
    Kim, Young-Tak
    Nam, Joo-Hyun
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (08) : 2303 - 2310
  • [26] Magnetic resonance imaging of rectal cancer: staging and restaging evaluation
    Courtney C. Moreno
    Patrick S. Sullivan
    Bobby T. Kalb
    Russell G. Tipton
    Krisztina Z. Hanley
    Hiroumi D. Kitajima
    W. Thomas Dixon
    John R. Votaw
    John N. Oshinski
    Pardeep K. Mittal
    Abdominal Imaging, 2015, 40 : 2613 - 2629
  • [27] Hybrid positron emission tomography-Magnetic resonance imaging for cardiac sarcoid
    Fadi G. Hage
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2019, 26 : 2005 - 2006
  • [28] Hybrid positron emission tomography-Magnetic resonance imaging for cardiac sarcoid
    Hage, Fadi G.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (06) : 2005 - 2006
  • [29] Diagnostic imaging for pancreatic cancer - Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography
    Saisho, H
    Yamaguchi, T
    PANCREAS, 2004, 28 (03) : 273 - 278
  • [30] Functional Imaging of Colorectal Cancer: Positron Emission Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Computed Tomography
    Kapse, Nikhil
    Goh, Vicky
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2009, 8 (02) : 77 - 87