Prediction of the Concentration and Source Contributions of PM2.5 and Gas-Phase Pollutants in an Urban Area with the SmartAQ Forecasting System

被引:2
|
作者
Siouti, Evangelia [1 ,2 ]
Skyllakou, Ksakousti [2 ]
Kioutsioukis, Ioannis [3 ]
Patoulias, David [2 ]
Apostolopoulos, Ioannis D. [2 ]
Fouskas, George [2 ]
Pandis, Spyros N. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Dept Chem Engn, Patras 26504, Greece
[2] Fdn Res & Technol Hellas FORTH, Inst Chem Engn Sci ICE HT, Patras 26504, Greece
[3] Univ Patras, Dept Phys, Patras 26504, Greece
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
air quality predictions; pollutant sources; PM2.5; NOx; O-3; evaluation metrics; AIR-QUALITY; ORGANIC AEROSOL; TRANSPORT; MODEL; APPORTIONMENT; RESOLUTION; COOKING;
D O I
10.3390/atmos15010008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The SmartAQ (Smart Air Quality) forecasting system produces high-resolution (1 x 1 km(2)) air quality predictions in an urban area for the next three days using advanced chemical transport modeling. In this study, we evaluated the SmartAQ performance for the urban area of Patras, Greece, for four months (July 2021, September 2021, December 2021, and March 2022), covering all seasons. In this work, we assess the system's ability to forecast PM2.5 levels and the major gas-phase pollutants during periods with different meteorological conditions and local emissions, but also in areas of the city with different characteristics (urban, suburban, and background sites). We take advantage of this SmartAQ application to also quantify the main sources of the pollutants at each site. During the summertime, PM2.5 model performance was excellent (Fbias < 15%, Ferror < 30%) for all sites both in the city center and suburbs. For the city center, the model reproduced well (MB = -0.9 mu g m(-3), ME = 2.5 mu g m(-3)) the overall measured PM2.5 behavior and the high nighttime peaks due to cooking activity, as well as the transported PM pollution in the suburbs. During the fall, the SmartAQ PM2.5 performance was good (Fbias < 42%, Ferror < 45%) for the city center and the suburban core, while it was average (Fbias < 50%, Ferror < 54%, MB, ME < 3.3 mu g m(-3)) for the suburbs because the model overpredicted the long-range transport of pollution. For wintertime, the system reproduced well (MB = -2 mu g m(-3), ME = 6.5 mu g m(-3)) the PM2.5 concentration in the high-biomass-burning emission area with an excellent model performance (Fbias = -4%, Ferror = 33%) and reproduced well (MB < 1.1 mu g m(-3), ME < 3 mu g m(-3)) the background PM2.5 levels. SmartAQ reproduced well the PM2.5 concentrations in the urban and suburban core during the spring (Fbias < 40%, Ferror < 50%, MB < 8.5 mu g m(-3), ME < 10 mu g m(-3)), while it tended to slightly overestimate the regional pollution. The main local source of fine PM during summer and autumn was cooking, but most of the PM was transported to the city. Residential biomass burning was the dominant particle source of pollution during winter and early spring. For gas-phase pollutants, the system reproduced well the daily nitrogen oxides (NOx) concentrations during the summertime. Predicted NOx concentrations during the winter were consistent with measurements at night but underestimated the observations during the rest of the day. SmartAQ achieved the US EPA modeling goals for hourly O-3 concentrations indicating good model performance.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of a modelling system for predicting the concentrations of PM2.5 in an urban area
    Kauhaniemi, M.
    Karppinen, A.
    Harkonen, J.
    Kousa, A.
    Alaviippola, B.
    Koskentalo, T.
    Aarnio, P.
    Elolahde, T.
    Kukkonen, J.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 42 (19) : 4517 - 4529
  • [32] Statistical PM2.5 Prediction in an Urban Area Using Vertical Meteorological Factors
    Saiohai, Jutapas
    Bualert, Surat
    Thongyen, Thunyapat
    Duangmal, Kittichai
    Choomanee, Parkpoom
    Szymanski, Wladyslaw W.
    ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (03)
  • [33] Relationships between PM10, PM2.5 and other pollutants in an urban area (Lagrangian model and experiment)
    Gorbunov, B.
    Moore, M.
    Williams, I.
    Hamilton, R.
    Journal of Aerosol Science, 1999, 30 (Suppl. 1)
  • [34] Composition characteristics and source implications of biomarkers in PM2.5 at a typical urban area of Chongqing
    Feng, Ting
    Wang, Feng-Wen
    Lu, Pei-Li
    Liu, Li
    Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, 2021, 41 (12): : 5578 - 5590
  • [35] An estimated method of urban PM2.5 concentration distribution for a mobile sensing system
    Hu, Yidan
    Fan, Jin
    Zhang, Hua
    Chen, Xinxin
    Dai, Guojun
    PERVASIVE AND MOBILE COMPUTING, 2016, 25 : 88 - 103
  • [36] A Novel Combined Prediction Scheme Based on CNN and LSTM for Urban PM2.5 Concentration
    Qin, Dongming
    Yu, Jian
    Zou, Guojian
    Yong, Ruihan
    Zhao, Qin
    Zhang, Bo
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 20050 - 20059
  • [37] Source contributions to PM2.5 particles in the urban air of a town situated close to a steel works
    Oravisjärvi, K
    Timonen, KL
    Wiikinkoski, T
    Ruuskanen, AR
    Heinänen, K
    Ruuskanen, J
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 37 (08) : 1013 - 1022
  • [38] A spatial correlation prediction model of urban PM2.5 concentration based on deconvolution and LSTM
    Zhang, Bo
    Liu, Yuan
    Yong, RuiHan
    Zou, Guojian
    Yang, Ru
    Pan, Jianguo
    Li, Maozhen
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2023, 544
  • [39] An Outlier-Robust Point and Interval Forecasting System for Daily PM2.5 Concentration
    Yin, Ziqi
    Fang, Xin
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [40] Chemical characterization of outdoor PM2.5 and gas-phase compounds in Mira Loma, California
    Sawant, AA
    Na, K
    Zhu, XN
    Cocker, DR
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (33) : 5517 - 5528