The Effect of Retailer' Social Responsibility and Government Subsidy on the Performance of Low-Carbon Supply Chain

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Ping [1 ]
Yu, Xiao-Hui [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Qiang [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Polytech, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100176, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Wuzi Univ, Inst Carbon Peak & Neutral, Beijing 101149, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Wuzi Univ, Logist Sch, Beijing 101149, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Social welfare; Subsidy; Cooperation; Carbon emission; Game; CAP-AND-TRADE; GREEN TECHNOLOGY; COORDINATION; COLLABORATION; INNOVATION; INDUSTRY; WELFARE; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1007/s40305-023-00479-z
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Based on the cap-and-trade regulation, the effect of retailer's social responsibility and subsidy are analyzed in a two-level low-carbon supply chain. The government subsidizes manufacturer to encourage low-carbon technological innovation. It is gotten that both retailer's social responsibility and subsidy can improve the profit of manufacturer and reduce the carbon emission level. Although more subsidies to manufacturer indeed may decrease the profit of retailer, it is good measure to promote the centralized decision-making between the retailer and manufacturer. A certain retailer's social responsibilities are good for the carbon emission reduction, but it also brings about the decline of profit in the supply chain. The centralized decision-making is always the best choice strategy for the carbon emission reduction, while in the decentralized decision-making situation, the retailer has more possibilities to care about social responsibility.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 267
页数:41
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pricing Decision for a Supply Chain with Social-responsibility Concerned Retailer
    Ma, Wei-Min
    Cai, Yan-Li
    Cheng, Rong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT, ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (ICMESD 17), 2017, 21 : 278 - 287
  • [22] Optimizing sustainability: a dual-channel supply chain model considering the carbon abatement cost subsidy and the low-carbon consumption subsidy
    Zhang, Yunfeng
    Sun, Lijun
    Bilal, Muhammad
    Song, Tingting
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [23] The Impact of Government Subsidies on the Low-Carbon Supply Chain Based on Carbon Emission Reduction Level
    Li, Biao
    Geng, Yong
    Xia, Xiqiang
    Qiao, Dan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (14)
  • [24] Low-carbon consumption with government subsidy under asymmetric carbon emission information
    Ma, Cheng
    Yang, Hongguo
    Zhang, Weiping
    Huang, Shuai
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 318
  • [25] The Low-Carbon Supply Chain Coordination Problem with Consumers' Low-Carbon Preference
    Wu, Dan
    Yang, Yuxiang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [26] Pricing strategy of traceable agricultural supply chain decisions considering retailer's overconfidence with government subsidy
    Lan, Chongfeng
    Lan, Yaru
    Liu, Shengde
    ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2025, 112 : 487 - 495
  • [27] Recycling decisions of low-carbon e-commerce closed-loop supply chain under government subsidy mechanism and altruistic preference
    Wang, Yuyan
    Fan, Runjie
    Shen, Liang
    Miller, William
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 259
  • [28] A coordination mechanism through cost sharing of corporate social responsibility and government subsidy in a two-echelon supply chain
    Liu, Yong
    Ren, Wenwen
    Xu, Qian
    Liu, Zhiyang
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2022, 37 (01) : 29 - 46
  • [29] Who will undertake corporate social responsibility in supply chain encroachment? Manufacturer or retailer
    Cheng, Yonghong
    Pan, Jiaxin
    Gong, Yu
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2024, 45 (03) : 1511 - 1527
  • [30] Modeling a low-carbon garment supply chain
    Shaw, Krishnendu
    Shankar, Ravi
    Yadav, Surendra S.
    Thakur, Lakshman S.
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2013, 24 (8-9) : 851 - 865