Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of new critical care practices during COVID-19: a multicenter qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)

被引:7
|
作者
Silver, Santana [1 ]
Jones, Kayla Christine [1 ]
Redmond, Sarah [2 ]
George, Emily [3 ]
Zornes, Sarah [2 ]
Barwise, Amelia [4 ]
Leppin, Aaron [2 ,5 ]
Dong, Yue [6 ]
Harmon, Lori A. A. [7 ]
Kumar, Vishakha K. K. [7 ]
Kordik, Christina [7 ]
Walkey, Allan J. J. [1 ,8 ]
Drainoni, Mari-Lynn [1 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Evans Ctr Implementat & Improvement Sci CIIS, Dept Med, Sch Med, 72 East Concord St, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Robert D & Patricia E Kern Ctr Sci Hlth Care Deliv, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[5] Mayo Ctr Clin & Translat Sci CCaTS, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[6] Mayo Clin, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[7] Soc Crit Care Med, Dept Res & Qual, 500 Midway Dr, Mt Prospect, IL 60056 USA
[8] Pulm Ctr, Div Pulm Allergy Crit Care & Sleep Med, 72 E Concord St Housman R, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[9] Boston Univ, Sect Infect Dis, Sch Med, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Room 2014, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[10] Boston Univ, Dept Hlth Law Policy & Management, Sch Publ Hlth, 801 Massachusetts Ave,Room 2014, Boston, MA 02118 USA
关键词
COVID-19; Critical care; Implementation science; CFIR; Barriers; Facilitators; RESPIRATORY ILLNESS UNIVERSAL; VIRAL-INFECTION; INNOVATIONS; IMPROVEMENT; OUTCOMES; SAFETY; SILOS;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-023-09209-w
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic produced unprecedented demands and rapidly changing evidence and practices within critical care settings. The purpose of this study was to identify factors and strategies that hindered and facilitated effective implementation of new critical care practices and policies in response to the pandemic.MethodsWe used a cross-sectional, qualitative study design to conduct semi-structured in-depth interviews with critical care leaders across the United States. The interviews were audio-taped and professionally transcribed verbatim. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), three qualitative researchers used rapid analysis methods to develop relevant codes and identify salient themes.ResultsAmong the 17 hospitals that agreed to participate in this study, 31 clinical leaders were interviewed. The CFIR-driven rapid analysis of the interview transcripts generated 12 major themes, which included six implementation facilitators (i.e., factors that promoted the implementation of new critical care practices) and six implementation barriers (i.e., factors that hindered the implementation of new critical care practices). These themes spanned the five CFIR domains (Intervention Characteristics, Outer Setting, Inner Setting, Characteristics of Individuals, and Process) and 11 distinct CFIR constructs. Salient facilitators to implementation efforts included staff resilience, commitment, and innovation, which were supported through collaborative feedback and decision-making mechanisms between leadership and frontline staff. Major identified barriers included lack of access to reliable and transferable information, available resources, uncollaborative leadership and communication styles.ConclusionsThrough applying the CFIR to organize and synthesize our qualitative data, this study revealed important insights into implementation determinants that influenced the uptake of new critical care practices during COVID-19. As the pandemic continues to burden critical care units, clinical leaders should consider emulating the effective change management strategies identified. The cultivation of streamlined, engaging, and collaborative leadership and communication mechanisms not only supported implementation of new care practices across sites, but it also helped reduce salient implementation barriers, particularly resource and staffing shortages. Future critical care implementation studies should seek to capitalize on identified facilitators and reduce barriers.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of nutrition interventions at primary health care units of Ethiopia: A consolidated framework for implementation research
    Endris, Bilal Shikur
    Fenta, Esete
    Getnet, Yalemwork
    Spigt, Mark
    Dinant, Geert-Jan
    Gebreyesus, Seifu H.
    MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION, 2023, 19 (01):
  • [22] Facilitators and barriers to implementing the Diabetes Prevention Program in rural church settings: A qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
    Rawal, Smita
    Snead, Caleb A.
    Soiro, Frantz D.
    Lawrence, Jeffery
    Rivers, Brian M.
    Young, Henry N.
    JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2024,
  • [23] The Potential for Managed Alcohol Programmes in Scotland during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Exploration of Key Areas for Implementation Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
    Carver, Hannah
    Parkes, Tessa
    Masterton, Wendy
    Booth, Hazel
    Ball, Lee
    Murdoch, Helen
    Falzon, Danilo
    Pauly, Bernie M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (22)
  • [24] Implementation of Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation After Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Qualitative Study Guided by Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Framework
    Kalkdijk, J.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 : S105 - S105
  • [25] Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to Foster the Adoption of a New Dementia Education Game During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Hung, Lillian
    Mann, Jim
    Upreti, Mona
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2023, 63 (03): : 467 - 477
  • [26] Barriers and facilitators to implementation of nutrition-related actions in school settings in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a qualitative systematic review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
    Meshkovska, Biljana
    Gebremariam, Mekdes Kebede
    Atukunda, Prudence
    Iversen, Per Ole
    Wandel, Margareta
    Lien, Nanna
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 4 (01):
  • [27] Implementation of nutritional care in hospitals: A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators using implementation theory
    Nielsen, Laerke Prietzel
    Thomsen, Krista Horsholt
    Alleslev, Camilla
    Mikkelsen, Sabina
    Holst, Mette
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2024, 38 (03) : 657 - 668
  • [28] Application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to Study Top-Performing Practices in the RISE Registry
    Jacobsohn, Lindsay
    Nasrallah, Catherine
    Young, Cammie
    Schmajuk, Gabriela
    Yazdany, Jinoos
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 74 : 2497 - 2499
  • [29] HealthPathways implementation in a New Zealand health region: a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
    Stokes, Tim
    Tumilty, Emma
    Doolan-Noble, Fiona
    Gauld, Robin
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (12):
  • [30] Implementation of Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation after rectal cancer surgery: A qualitative study guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
    Bosch, N. M.
    Kalkdijk-Dijkstra, A. J.
    Broens, P. M. A.
    van Westreenen, H. L.
    Pierie, J. P. E. N.
    Klarenbeek, B. R.
    van der Heijden, J. A. G.
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (06):