Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the Hispanic adult population of South Carolina: a complex mixed-method design evaluation study

被引:5
|
作者
Rossi, Maria Mercedes [1 ]
Parisi, Michelle A. [2 ]
Cartmell, Kathleen B. [3 ]
Mcfall, Danielle [4 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Dept Food Nutr & Packaging Sci, Pool Agr Ctr C228, Clemson, SC 29631 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Nutr Sci, 206 Hoke Smith Annex, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Clemson Univ, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, 534 Edwards Hall, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[4] Clemson Univ, Rural Hlth & Nutr Program Team, 120 Lehotsky Hall, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
关键词
Vaccine hesitancy; COVID-19; Attitudes; Barriers; Participants' perceptions; Focus groups; Mixed method;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-023-16771-9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn August 2021, only 47.6% of all eligible residents in South Carolina (SC) had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, with only 41% having completed their vaccination series. Additionally, only 27% of all Hispanics in SC had completed their vaccination series compared to 34.1% of non-Hispanics. Vaccine hesitancy is a complex phenomenon that is context and vaccine-specific. Focusing on unvaccinated Hispanics living in rural areas of SC, this study aimed to identify barriers to vaccination and provide an educational intervention designed to address vaccine hesitancy.MethodsA complex mixed-methods evaluation design was used to conduct this study. First, in-person vaccine educational sessions were implemented, along with a pre-post-test survey, to assess changes in knowledge, attitudes, motivations, barriers, and intentions to receive COVID-19 vaccination. Second, in-person follow-up focus groups were held with the same participants to gather in-depth insight about participants' knowledge and attitudes about the COVID-19 vaccination. Third, an online follow-up survey was conducted to assess the effect of the training and discussion session on COVID-19 vaccination. Study outcomes were assessed among the 17 individuals who participated in the educational sessions and focus group discussions.ResultsFindings revealed that for unvaccinated Hispanics living in South Carolina; vaccine hesitancy was primarily driven by: 1) misinformation and information coming from unverified sources and 2) negative perceptions of the safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines. Specifically, participants were fearful that the vaccine development was rushed and that the vaccines might contain questionable ingredients that could cause strong side effects or even death. Participants were also concerned that vaccination might cause them to get sick and be hospitalized, which would have financial implications since they could not afford healthcare or take time off work.ConclusionsProgram implementation and mass communication campaigns should focus on COVID-19 vaccine safety and effectiveness, including side effects, what to expect after being vaccinated, and how to look for information from reputable sources. The educational session implemented proved to be effective and helped reduce vaccine hesitancy since most participants (80%) self-reported receiving a COVID-19 vaccine after program participation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the adult population in Bangladesh: A nationwide cross-sectional survey
    Hossain, Mohammad Bellal
    Alam, Md Zakiul
    Islam, Md Syful
    Sultan, Shafayat
    Faysal, Md Mahir
    Rima, Sharmin
    Hossain, Md Anwer
    Al Mamun, Abdullah
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (12):
  • [32] Using the 5C model to understand COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy across a National and South Carolina sample
    Rancher, Caitlin
    Moreland, Angela D.
    Smith, Daniel W.
    Cornelison, Vickey
    Schmidt, Michael G.
    Boyle, John
    Dayton, James
    Kilpatrick, Dean G.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2023, 160 : 180 - 186
  • [33] Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A cross-sectional study in Malang District, Indonesia
    Sujarwoto, Asri
    Maharani, Asri
    Holipah
    Andarini, Sri
    Saputri, Rindi Ardika Melsalasa
    Pakpahan, Eduwin
    Oceandy, Delvac
    Tampubolon, Gindo
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 10
  • [34] COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among health workers in rural Uganda: A mixed methods study
    Ouni, Patrick Diox
    Namulondo, Racheal
    Wanume, Benon
    Okia, David
    Olupot, Peter Olupot
    Nantale, Ritah
    Matovu, Joseph K. B.
    Napyo, Agnes
    Lubaale, Yovani A. Moses
    Nshakira, Nathan
    Mukunya, David
    VACCINE: X, 2023, 13
  • [35] Vaccine Confidence and Hesitancy at the Start of COVID-19 Vaccine Deployment in the UK: An Embedded Mixed-Methods Study
    Roberts, Chrissy H.
    Brindle, Hannah
    Rogers, Nina T.
    Eggo, Rosalind M.
    Enria, Luisa
    Lees, Shelley
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [36] Evaluation of COVID-19 ECHO training program for healthcare workers in India-A Mixed-Method Study
    Panda, Rajmohan
    Mishra, Nivedita
    Lahoti, Supriya
    Prabhu, Rajath R.
    Mishra, Arti
    Singh, Kalpana
    Rai, Kumud
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [37] Acceptance and hesitancy of COVID-19 vaccine among Nepalese population: A cross-sectional study
    Dahal, Suresh
    Pokhrel, Srishti
    Mehta, Subash
    Karki, Supriya
    Bist, Harish Chandra
    Sahu, Dikesh Kumar
    Lageju, Nimesh
    Panthi, Sagar
    Neupane, Durga
    Shrestha, Ashish
    Bhagat, Tarakant
    Agrawal, Santosh Kumari
    Gautam, Ujwal
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (10):
  • [38] COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Chinese Population: A Large-Scale National Study
    Wu, Jian
    Li, Quanman
    Silver Tarimo, Clifford
    Wang, Meiyun
    Gu, Jianqin
    Wei, Wei
    Ma, Mingze
    Zhao, Lipei
    Mu, Zihan
    Miao, Yudong
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [39] Social interactions and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: Evidence from a full population study in Sweden
    Klaesson, Johan
    Lobo, Jose
    Mellander, Charlotta
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (11):
  • [40] The COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis and Patient Safety Culture: A Mixed-Method Study
    Brborovic, Ognjen
    Brborovic, Hana
    Hrain, Leonarda
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (04)