Biologic versus synthetic prosthesis for chest wall reconstruction: a matched analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Vanstraelen, Stijn [1 ]
Bains, Manjit S. [1 ]
Dycoco, Joe [1 ]
Adusumilli, Prasad S. [1 ]
Bott, Matthew J. [1 ]
Downey, Robert J. [1 ]
Huang, James [1 ]
Isbell, James M. [1 ]
Molena, Daniela [1 ]
Park, Bernard J. [1 ]
Rusch, Valerie W. [1 ]
Sihag, Smita [1 ]
Allen, Robert J. [2 ]
Cordeiro, Peter G. [2 ]
Coriddi, Michelle R. [2 ]
Dayan, Joseph H. [2 ]
Disa, Joseph J. [2 ]
Matros, Evan [2 ]
Mccarthy, Colleen M. [2 ]
Nelson, Jonas A. [2 ]
Stern, Carrie [2 ]
Shahzad, Farooq [2 ]
Mehrara, Babak [2 ]
Jones, David R. [1 ]
Rocco, Gaetano [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Thorac Serv, New York, NY USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Plast Surg Serv, New York, NY USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Thorac Serv, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10060 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Chest wall resection; Chest wall reconstruction; Biologic prosthesis; Synthetic prosthesis; Postoperative outcomes; Surgical site complications; RESECTION; MATRIX; CANCER; TUMORS; MESH;
D O I
10.1093/ejcts/ezad348
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes between biologic and synthetic reconstructions after chest wall resection in a matched cohort.METHODS All patients who underwent reconstruction after full-thickness chest wall resection from 2000 to 2022 were reviewed and stratified by prosthesis type (biologic or synthetic). Biologic prostheses were of biologic origin or were fully absorbable and incorporable. Integer matching was performed to reduce confounding. The study end point was surgical site complications requiring reoperation. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify associated risk factors.RESULTS In total, 438 patients underwent prosthetic chest wall reconstruction (unmatched: biologic, n = 49; synthetic, n = 389; matched: biologic, n = 46; synthetic, n = 46). After matching, the median (interquartile range) defect size was 83 cm2 (50-142) for the biologic group and 90 cm2 (48-146) for the synthetic group (P = 0.97). Myocutaneous flaps were used in 33% of biologic reconstructions (n = 15) and 33% of synthetic reconstructions (n = 15) in the matched cohort (P = 0.99). The incidence of surgical site complications requiring reoperation was not significantly different between biologic and synthetic reconstructions in the unmatched (3 [6%] vs 29 [7%]; P = 0.99) and matched (2 [4%] vs 4 [9%]; P = 0.68) cohorts. On the multivariable analysis, operative time [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00-1.01; P = 0.006] and operative blood loss (aOR = 1.00, 95% CI, 1.00-1.00]; P = 0.012) were associated with higher rates of surgical site complications requiring reoperation; microvascular free flaps (aOR = 0.03, 95% CI, 0.00-0.42; P = 0.024) were associated with lower rates.CONCLUSIONS The incidence of surgical site complications requiring reoperation was not significantly different between biologic and synthetic prostheses in chest wall reconstructions. The positive survival outcomes associated with complete resection of chest wall tumours have led to an increase in more extensive chest wall resections [1-3].
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reconstruction of anterior chest wall: a clinical analysis
    Gao, Erji
    Li, Yang
    Zhao, Tiancheng
    Guo, Xiang
    He, Weiwei
    Wu, Weiming
    Zhao, Yonghong
    Yang, Yi
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 13
  • [22] Reconstruction of anterior chest wall: a clinical analysis
    Erji Gao
    Yang Li
    Tiancheng Zhao
    Xiang Guo
    Weiwei He
    Weiming Wu
    Yonghong Zhao
    Yi Yang
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 13
  • [23] Chest wall reconstruction
    Papadopoulos, O
    Georgiou, P
    Christopoulos, A
    Tsakoniatis, N
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2002, 48 (01) : 105 - 107
  • [24] Reconstruction of the chest wall
    Liapakis, I. E.
    Korkolis, D.
    Papadopoulos, O.
    Kokkalis, G.
    El-Shazly, M.
    Golematis, B. C.
    Vassilopoulos, P. P.
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2008, 13 (02): : 185 - 191
  • [25] RECONSTRUCTION OF THE CHEST WALL
    DINGMAN, RO
    ARGENTA, LC
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1981, 32 (02): : 202 - 208
  • [26] In Vitro Comparison of Biological and Synthetic Materials for Skeletal Chest Wall Reconstruction
    Wiegmann, Bettina
    Korossis, Sotirios
    Burgwitz, Karin
    Hurschler, Christof
    Fischer, Stefan
    Haverich, Axel
    Kuehn, Christian
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 99 (03): : 991 - 998
  • [27] CHEST WALL RECONSTRUCTION
    PAIROLERO, PC
    ARNOLD, PG
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1981, 32 (04): : 325 - 326
  • [28] Erosion Bleeding as a Late Complication of Chest Wall Reconstruction with a Dacron Mesh Silicone Prosthesis
    Sano, A.
    Takeuchi, E.
    Fukami, T.
    Murakawa, T.
    Nakajima, J.
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2012, 60 (02): : 170 - 171
  • [29] Conditions for successful chest wall reconstruction with silicone prosthesis in male patients with Poland anomaly
    Shipkov, Christo D.
    Mojallal, Ali
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2009, 62 (11): : E531 - E532
  • [30] Abdominal Wall and Chest Wall Reconstruction
    Althubaiti, Ghazi
    Butler, Charles E.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 133 (05) : 688E - 701E