Biologic versus synthetic prosthesis for chest wall reconstruction: a matched analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Vanstraelen, Stijn [1 ]
Bains, Manjit S. [1 ]
Dycoco, Joe [1 ]
Adusumilli, Prasad S. [1 ]
Bott, Matthew J. [1 ]
Downey, Robert J. [1 ]
Huang, James [1 ]
Isbell, James M. [1 ]
Molena, Daniela [1 ]
Park, Bernard J. [1 ]
Rusch, Valerie W. [1 ]
Sihag, Smita [1 ]
Allen, Robert J. [2 ]
Cordeiro, Peter G. [2 ]
Coriddi, Michelle R. [2 ]
Dayan, Joseph H. [2 ]
Disa, Joseph J. [2 ]
Matros, Evan [2 ]
Mccarthy, Colleen M. [2 ]
Nelson, Jonas A. [2 ]
Stern, Carrie [2 ]
Shahzad, Farooq [2 ]
Mehrara, Babak [2 ]
Jones, David R. [1 ]
Rocco, Gaetano [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Thorac Serv, New York, NY USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Plast Surg Serv, New York, NY USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Thorac Serv, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10060 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Chest wall resection; Chest wall reconstruction; Biologic prosthesis; Synthetic prosthesis; Postoperative outcomes; Surgical site complications; RESECTION; MATRIX; CANCER; TUMORS; MESH;
D O I
10.1093/ejcts/ezad348
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes between biologic and synthetic reconstructions after chest wall resection in a matched cohort.METHODS All patients who underwent reconstruction after full-thickness chest wall resection from 2000 to 2022 were reviewed and stratified by prosthesis type (biologic or synthetic). Biologic prostheses were of biologic origin or were fully absorbable and incorporable. Integer matching was performed to reduce confounding. The study end point was surgical site complications requiring reoperation. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify associated risk factors.RESULTS In total, 438 patients underwent prosthetic chest wall reconstruction (unmatched: biologic, n = 49; synthetic, n = 389; matched: biologic, n = 46; synthetic, n = 46). After matching, the median (interquartile range) defect size was 83 cm2 (50-142) for the biologic group and 90 cm2 (48-146) for the synthetic group (P = 0.97). Myocutaneous flaps were used in 33% of biologic reconstructions (n = 15) and 33% of synthetic reconstructions (n = 15) in the matched cohort (P = 0.99). The incidence of surgical site complications requiring reoperation was not significantly different between biologic and synthetic reconstructions in the unmatched (3 [6%] vs 29 [7%]; P = 0.99) and matched (2 [4%] vs 4 [9%]; P = 0.68) cohorts. On the multivariable analysis, operative time [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00-1.01; P = 0.006] and operative blood loss (aOR = 1.00, 95% CI, 1.00-1.00]; P = 0.012) were associated with higher rates of surgical site complications requiring reoperation; microvascular free flaps (aOR = 0.03, 95% CI, 0.00-0.42; P = 0.024) were associated with lower rates.CONCLUSIONS The incidence of surgical site complications requiring reoperation was not significantly different between biologic and synthetic prostheses in chest wall reconstructions. The positive survival outcomes associated with complete resection of chest wall tumours have led to an increase in more extensive chest wall resections [1-3].
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Synthetic Mesh Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix for Oncologic Chest Wall Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis
    Giordano, Salvatore
    Garvey, Patrick B.
    Clemens, Mark W.
    Baumann, Donald P.
    Selber, Jesse C.
    Rice, David C.
    Butler, Charles E.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (08) : 3009 - 3017
  • [2] Synthetic Mesh Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix for Oncologic Chest Wall Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis
    Salvatore Giordano
    Patrick B. Garvey
    Mark W. Clemens
    Donald P. Baumann
    Jesse C. Selber
    David C. Rice
    Charles E. Butler
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 3009 - 3017
  • [3] Chest Wall Reconstruction With Methacrylate Prosthesis in Poland Syndrome
    Arango Tomas, Elisabet
    Baamonde Laborda, Carlos
    Algar Algar, Javier
    Salvatierra Velazquez, Angel
    ARCHIVOS DE BRONCONEUMOLOGIA, 2013, 49 (10): : 450 - 452
  • [4] Chest wall reconstruction, prosthesis and allografts: a narrative review
    Girotti, Paolo Nicola Camillo
    Bianchi, Fabrizio
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2023, 15 (12) : 7077 - 7087
  • [5] Results of chest wall resection and reconstruction with and without rigid prosthesis
    Weyant, MJ
    Bains, MS
    Venkatraman, E
    Downey, RJ
    Park, BJ
    Flores, RM
    Rizk, N
    Rusch, VW
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2006, 81 (01): : 279 - 285
  • [6] COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF RESORBABLE SYNTHETIC ONLAY AND BIOLOGIC INTRAPERITONEAL MESH FOR ABDOMINAL WALL RECONSTRUCTION: A 2-YEAR MATCHED PAIR ANALYSIS
    Othman, Sammy
    Christopher, Adrienne
    Patel, Viren
    Jia, Hanna
    Mellia, Joseph
    Kovach, Stephen
    Fischer, John
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [7] A paradigm shift for diaphragmatic and chest wall reconstruction using a bovine acellular dermal matrix: an analysis versus synthetic meshes
    Lampridis, Savvas
    Bille, Andrea
    GENERAL THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 71 (02) : 121 - 128
  • [8] A paradigm shift for diaphragmatic and chest wall reconstruction using a bovine acellular dermal matrix: an analysis versus synthetic meshes
    Savvas Lampridis
    Andrea Billè
    General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2023, 71 : 121 - 128
  • [9] Outcomes of biologic versus synthetic mesh in CDC class 3 and 4 open abdominal wall reconstruction
    Michael Katzen
    Sullivan A. Ayuso
    Jana Sacco
    Dau Ku
    Gregory T. Scarola
    Kent W. Kercher
    Paul D. Colavita
    Vedra A. Augenstein
    B. Todd Heniford
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 3073 - 3083
  • [10] Outcomes of biologic versus synthetic mesh in CDC class 3 and 4 open abdominal wall reconstruction
    Katzen, Michael
    Ayuso, Sullivan A.
    Sacco, Jana
    Ku, Dau
    Scarola, Gregory T.
    Kercher, Kent W.
    Colavita, Paul D.
    Augenstein, Vedra A.
    Heniford, B. Todd
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (04): : 3073 - 3083