Mesorectal reconstruction with pedicled greater omental transplantation to relieve low anterior resection syndrome following total intersphincteric resection in patients with ultra-low rectal cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Liao, Jiankun [1 ,2 ]
Qin, Haiquan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zheng [3 ]
Meng, Linghou [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Wentao [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Jungang [1 ,2 ]
Mo, Xianwei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Div Colorectal & Anal, Canc Hosp, 71, Hedi Rd, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Med Univ, Guangxi Clin Res Ctr Colorectal Canc, Div Colorectal & Anal, Canc Hosp, 71, Hedi Rd, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Guangxi Med Univ, Med Imaging Ctr, Canc Hosp, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Ultra-low rectal cancer; Total intersphincteric resection; Pedicled greater omental transplantation; Low anterior resection syndrome; Anorectal function; SPHINCTER-SAVING SURGERY; COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; COLORECTAL-CANCER; CM; QUALITY; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; COLOPLASTY; DISORDER; EXCISION; MARGIN;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-023-02140-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundTotal intersphincteric resection (ISR) is the ultimate anus-preserving surgery for patients with ultra-low rectal cancer (ULRC), which can result in various degrees of anorectal dysfunction. Known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), it seriously affects the postoperative quality of life of patients. The aim of this study was to discuss the value of mesorectal reconstruction with pedicled greater omental transplantation (PGOT) to relieve LARS following total ISR in patients with ULRC, hoping to provide new ideas and strategies for the prevention and improvement of LARS.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed hospitalization data and postoperative anorectal function of 26 ULRC patients, who were met inclusion and exclusion criteria in our center from January 2015 to February 2022. And combined with the results of anorectal manometry and rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) defecography of some patients, we assessed comprehensively anorectal physiological and morphological changes of the patients after surgery, and their correlation with LARS.ResultsIn this study, 26 patients with ULRC were enrolled and divided into observation group (n = 15) and control group (n = 11) according to whether PGOT was performed. There were no significant differences in surgical results such as operative time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Postoperative follow-up showed that patients in both groups showed severe LARS within 3 months after surgery, but from the 3(rd) month after surgery, LARS in both groups gradually began to decrease, especially in the observation group, which showed faster recovery and better recovery, with statistically significant difference (P < 0.001). Through anorectal manometry, the mean rectal resting pressure in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P = 0.010). In addition, the postoperative thickness of the posterior rectal mesenterium in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P = 0.001), and also higher than the preoperative level (P = 0.018). Moreover, rectal MRI defecography showed that the neo-rectum had good compliance under the matting of greater omentum, and its intestinal peristalsis was coordinated.ConclusionsULRC patients, with the help of greater omentum, coordinated their neo-rectum peristalsis after total ISR and recovery of LARS was faster and better. PGOT is expected to be an effective strategy for LARS prevention and treatment of ULRC patients after surgery and is worthy of clinical promotion.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection with Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
    Zaharie, Florin
    Mocan, Lucian
    Tomus, Claudiu
    Zaharie, Roxana
    Iancu, Cornel
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 59 (114) : 405 - 408
  • [22] Robotic total intersphincteric resection with total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancer - a video vignette
    Kumar, B. R.
    Pandey, D.
    Bankar, S.
    Rohila, J.
    DeSouza, A.
    Saklani, A.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2020, 22 (12) : 2344 - 2345
  • [23] SAFETY OF ULTRA-LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION FOR LOW RECTAL CANCER IN ELDERLY PATIENTS.
    Kwak, J.
    Yu, C.
    Jang, T.
    Kim, K.
    Yang, S.
    Yoon, Y.
    Yoon, S.
    Lim, S.
    Kim, J.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (05) : E155 - E155
  • [24] A Novel Approach For Continence Preservation with Intersphincteric Resection in Ultra-Low Rectal Cancer
    Khafagy, M. M.
    Gawad, W.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 : S81 - S81
  • [25] Anorectal function after partial intersphincteric resection in ultra-low rectal cancer
    Gong, X.
    Jin, Z.
    Zheng, Q.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (12) : e802 - e806
  • [26] Intersphincteric resection for sphincter preservation in ultra-low rectal cancer-An update
    Kneist, Werner
    COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2025, 47 (01) : 7 - 15
  • [27] Comparison of outcomes following intersphincteric resection vs low anterior resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review
    Ursi, P.
    Santoro, A.
    Gemini, A.
    Arezzo, A.
    Pironi, D.
    Renzi, C.
    Cirocchi, R.
    Di Matteo, F. M.
    Maturo, A.
    D'Andrea, V.
    Sagar, J.
    GIORNALE DI CHIRURGIA, 2018, 39 (03): : 123 - 142
  • [28] Laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer Reply
    Gian Luca Baiocchi
    Carlo Augusto Sartori
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27 : 1449 - 1450
  • [29] Laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer Reply
    Baiocchi, Gian Luca
    Sartori, Carlo Augusto
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (04): : 1449 - 1450
  • [30] Low anterior intersphincteric resection, total mesorectal excision, coloplasty and coloanal anastomosis with neoanal smooth muscle encirclement for low rectal cancer
    Pescatori M.
    Spyrou M.
    Bilali S.
    Spinelli F.
    Orsini S.
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2005, 9 (2) : 185 - 185