How nurses use National Early Warning Score and Individual Early Warning Score to support their patient risk assessment practice: A fieldwork study

被引:11
|
作者
Langkjaer, Caroline S. [1 ]
Bundgaard, Karin [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bunkenborg, Gitte [5 ,6 ]
Nielsen, Pernille B. [7 ,8 ]
Iversen, Kasper K. [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Bestle, Morten H. [9 ,10 ]
Bove, Dorthe G. [11 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp North Zealand, Dept Emergency Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Clin Nursing Res Unit, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Clin Neuro Head & Orthopaed Dis, Aalborg, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ, Hlth Fac, Dept Publ Hlth, Nursing, Aarhus C, Denmark
[5] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Holbaek, Dept Anesthesiol, Holbaek, Denmark
[6] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Reg Hlth Res, Odense C, Denmark
[7] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Herlev & Gentofte, Dept Cardiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[8] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Herlev & Gentofte, Dept Emergency Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[9] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[10] Copenhagen Univ Hosp North Zealand, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Copenhagen, Denmark
[11] Univ Coll Absalon, Ctr Nursing, Trekroner Forskerpk 4, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
关键词
decision-making; early warning score; ethnography; nursing; observation practice; participant observation; qualitative research; risk assessment; track and trigger system;
D O I
10.1111/jan.15547
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
AimTo explore and describe how the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and Individual Early Warning Score (I-EWS) are used and how they support nurses' patient risk assessment practice. DesignA qualitative observational fieldwork study drawing on ethnographical principles was performed in six hospitals in two regions of Denmark in 2019. MethodsData were generated from participant observations and informal interviews with 32 nurses across 15 different wards in the hospitals. A total of 180 h of participant observation was performed. The observations lasted between 1.5 and 8 h and were conducted during day or evening shifts. ResultsNEWS and I-EWS supported nurses' observations of patients, providing useful knowledge for planning patient care, and prompting critical thinking. However, the risk assessment task was sometimes delegated to less experienced staff members, such as nursing students and healthcare assistants. The Early Warning Score (EWS) systems were often adapted by nurses according to contextual aspects, such as the culture of the speciality in which the nurses worked and their levels of competency. In some situations, I-EWS had the effect of enhancing nurse autonomy and responsibility for decision-making in relation to patient care. ConclusionsEWS systems support nurses' patient risk assessment practice, providing useful information. I-EWS makes it easier to factor the heterogeneity of patients and the clinical situation into the risk assessments. The delegation of risk assessment to other, less experienced staff members pose a risk to patient safety, which needs to be addressed in the ongoing debate regarding the shortage of nurses. ImpactThe findings of this study can help ward nurses, hospital managers and policymakers to develop and improve strategies for improved person-centred nursing care.
引用
收藏
页码:789 / 797
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Factors affecting response to National Early Warning Score (NEWS)
    Kolic, Ivana
    Crane, Smiley
    McCartney, Suzanne
    Perkins, Zane
    Taylor, Alex
    RESUSCITATION, 2015, 90 : 85 - 90
  • [42] Modifications to the National Early Warning Score: a scoping review protocol
    Milne-Ives, Madison
    Riccalton, Victoria
    Plummer, Chris
    Threlfall, Lynsey
    Cong, Cen
    Ananthakrishnan, Ananya
    Meinert, Edward
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (10):
  • [43] The National Early Warning Score: from concept to NHS implementation
    Williams, Bryan
    CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 22 (06) : 499 - 505
  • [44] The National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2)
    Smith, Gary B.
    Redfern, Oliver C.
    Pimentel, Marco A. F.
    Gerry, Stephen
    Collins, Gary S.
    Malycha, James
    Prytherch, David
    Schmidt, Paul E.
    Watkinson, Peter J.
    CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 19 (03) : 260 - 260
  • [45] Modifications to the National Early Warning Score 2: a Scoping Review
    Riccalton, Victoria
    Threlfall, Lynsey
    Ananthakrishnan, Ananya
    Cong, Cen
    Milne-Ives, Madison
    Le Roux, Peta
    Plummer, Chris
    Meinert, Edward
    BMC MEDICINE, 2025, 23 (01):
  • [46] Attitudes of clinical staff to the national early warning score system
    Duignan, M. F.
    O'Connor, P.
    Offiah, G.
    Lydon, S.
    Byrne, D.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 184 : S149 - S149
  • [47] NEWSDIG: The National Early Warning Score Development and Implementation Group
    Jones, Mike
    CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2012, 12 (06) : 501 - 503
  • [48] Clinical assessment as a part of an early warning score-a Danish cluster-randomised, multicentre study of an individual early warning score (vol 4, pg e497, 2022)
    Nielsen, P. B.
    Langkjaer, C. S.
    Schultz, M.
    LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2022, 4 (12): : E861 - E861
  • [49] Comparison of the Aotearoa New Zealand Early Warning Score and National Early Warning Score to predict adverse inpatient events in a vital sign dataset
    Mohan, C.
    Entezami, P.
    John, S.
    Hewitt, J.
    Sylevych, V.
    Psirides, A.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 78 (07) : 830 - 839
  • [50] Comparison of the Aotearoa New Zealand Early Warning Score and National Early Warning Score to predict adverse inpatient events in a vital sign dataset
    Psirides, A.
    Mohan, C.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 78 (11) : 1422 - 1422