Organic and Slow-Release Fertilizer Substitution Strategies Improved the Sustainability of Pineapple Production Systems in the Tropics

被引:2
|
作者
Cai, Jinwen [1 ]
Cheng, Wenxiao [1 ]
Liang, Zhenghao [1 ,2 ]
Li, Changzhen [1 ]
Deng, Yan [2 ]
Yin, Tao [3 ]
Li, Changjiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Hainan Univ, Coll Trop Crops, Hainan Key Lab Sustainable Utilizat Trop Bioresour, Haikou 570228, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Univ, Coll Resources & Environm, Chongqing 400716, Peoples R China
[3] Hainan Tian Di Ren Ecol Agr Inc Co, Haikou 570228, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
fruit yield; nitrogen use efficiency; ammonia volatilization; nitrogen leaching; greenhouse gas emissions; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NITROGEN USE EFFICIENCY; N MANAGEMENT; RICE SYSTEMS; PADDY FIELDS; CARBON; FOOTPRINT; MANURE; CHINA; MITIGATION;
D O I
10.3390/su151310353
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The partial substitution of chemical nitrogen fertilizers with organic fertilizer and slow-release fertilizer could improve pineapple yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and decrease greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, the effect of organic and slow-release fertilizer substitution strategies on the carbon footprint (CF), nitrogen footprint (NF) and net ecosystem economic benefits (NEEB) from pineapple fields in the tropics remains largely unclear. Therefore, we conducted a long-term pineapple field trial (2017-2021) for the first time with five fertilization strategies (CK: no fertilizer; F: conventional fertilization(nitrogen (N) 817 kg ha(-1), phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5) 336 kg ha(-1), potassium oxide (K2O) 945 kg ha(-1)); RF: reduction of 41.7% N, 72.0% P2O5 and 33.1% K2O on an F basis; RFO: replacement of 20% N input with organic fertilizer on an RF basis; RFOS: replacement of 15% N input with slow-release fertilizer on an RFO basis) to identify the pineapple fruit yield, NUE, CF, NF and NEEB in the tropics. The results showed that in comparison to the F treatment, the RF, RFO and RFOS treatments improved pineapple yield (7.6%, 12.4% and 26.3%, respectively), NUE (66.4%, 75.5% and 87.7%, respectively, p < 0.05) and partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFPN) fertilizer (84.8%, 92.8% and 116.7%, respectively, p < 0.05). Additionally, of all the treatments, the RFOS treatment had the highest yield (87.8 t ha(-1)). N leaching (50.1-69.1%) and ammonia volatilization (21.6-26.2%) were the two primary routes for reactive nitrogen (Nr) loss. The field soils (36.8-45.7%) and N fertilizer production and transportation (21.2-29.5%) dominated the GHG emissions. Compared to the F treatment, the RF, RFO and RFOS treatments showed decreases in Nr losses, NF, GHG emissions and CF of 36.6-41.1%, 43.3-51.9%, 19.0-29.1% and 24.5-41.7%, respectively. Of all the treatments, the RFOS treatment had the lowest CF (191.8 kg CO(2)eq ha(-1) season) and NF (1.9 kg N t(-1) season). Additionally, the NEEB of the RF, RFO and RFOS treatments improved by 13.0-39.9% over that of the F treatment. The RFOS treatment (54,880 USD ha(-1)) resulted in the highest NEEB of all treatments. Therefore, the substitution of conventional inorganic fertilizers with organic and slow-release fertilizers is an effective method for achieving sustainable pineapple production. However, a process for further reducing GHG emissions from farmland soils and Nr losses from organic fertilizer addition still need attention in terms of pineapple production.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [21] Novel slow-release fertilizer promotes nitrogen circularity while increasing soil organic carbon
    Coyle, Katherine
    Adjei, Jedidian
    Abbasi, Ehsan
    Vargas, Princess
    Slaughter, Lindsey
    Alvarez-Pugliese, Christian E.
    Botte, Gerardine G.
    Siebecker, Matthew G.
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2025, 89 (01)
  • [22] Production of Microalgal Slow-Release Fertilizer by Valorizing Liquid Agricultural Digestate: Growth Experiments with Tomatoes
    Jimenez, Raquel
    Markou, Giorgos
    Tayibi, Saida
    Barakat, Abdellatif
    Chapsal, Camille
    Monlau, Florian
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (11):
  • [23] Production of a novel slow-release coal fly ash microbial fertilizer for restoration of mine vegetation
    Su, HaiFeng
    Lin, JiaFu
    Chen, Hua
    Wang, QingYuan
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 124 : 185 - 194
  • [24] Wet ball milling activated oyster shells for multifunctional slow-release compound fertilizer production
    Zhang, Weiqiang
    Jin, Dian
    Liu, Caixia
    Muneer, Muhammad Atif
    Zhu, Huanhuan
    Ren, Taoyu
    Xu, Hongnan
    Wang, Jingwen
    Lu, Zhenya
    Yuan, Deyi
    Tang, Yafu
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2024, 498
  • [25] Efficient production of lignin-based slow-release nitrogen fertilizer via microwave heating
    Wang, Haoran
    Chen, Xiaojuan
    Zhang, Lidan
    Li, Zhonghua
    Fan, Xiaolin
    Sun, Shaolong
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2021, 166
  • [26] Valorization of lignin by crosslinking for slow-release urea fertilizer systems: A promising approach for agricultural applications
    Vafakish, Bahareh
    Babaei-Ghazvini, Amin
    Patel, Ravi
    Acharya, Bishnu
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2024,
  • [27] Developing a slow-release nitrogen fertilizer from organic sources .2. Using poultry feathers
    Choi, JM
    Nelson, PV
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1996, 121 (04) : 634 - 638
  • [28] Developing a slow-release nitrogen fertilizer from organic sources .1. Using nonviable bacteria
    Choi, JM
    Nelson, PV
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1996, 121 (04) : 629 - 633
  • [29] Nano-potassium intercalated composted coir pith: A slow-release fertilizer suitable for laterite soils of humid tropics of India
    Bhavishya
    Subramanian, Kizhaeral Sevathapandian
    Gopal, Murali
    Bhat, Ravi
    Nair, Swapna Shanmukan
    Radhakrishnan, Malavika
    Rajesh, Muliyar Krishna
    BIOCATALYSIS AND AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 57
  • [30] Sustainable agro-waste pellets as granular slow-release fertilizer carrier systems for ammonium sulfate
    Steiger, B. G. K.
    Bui, N. T.
    Babalola, B. M.
    Wilson, L. D.
    RSC SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 2 (10): : 2979 - 2988