Performance comparison and enhancement of the thermal energy storage units under two expansion methods

被引:0
|
作者
Ma, Y. [1 ,2 ]
Tao, Y. [2 ]
Shi, L. [2 ]
Wang, Y. [1 ]
Tu, J. Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China
[2] RMIT Univ, Sch Engn, Melbourne 3004, Australia
关键词
Phase change material; Thermal energy storage; Modular combination; Linear structural expansion; Thermal performance; PCM-HEAT-EXCHANGER; EFFICIENCY RATIO; ONE SHELL; TUBE; SIMULATION; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.122245
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
To improve the performance of the basic thermal energy storage unit, two expansion methods, modular combination and linear structural expansion, are proposed and compared through numerical simulations. The impacts of the two expansion methods on the performance of the storage units are compared by investigating the thermal storage and release processes. Following the numerical study, both expansion methods can increase the heat storage capacity and airflow rates compared to a basic phase change material (PCM) storage unit linearly. However, the linear structural expansion method will increase the PCM melting time from 147 min to 367 min when the heat storage capacity of the basic unit is increased two times, which is about 2.5 times longer duration than using the modular expansion method. As for the heat release process, the results indicate that thermal release performance using linear structural expansion is lower than that of the modular combination along with a decrease in heat release efficiency of about 32.53 %. In conclusion the modular combination method is proved to be more efficient compared to the linear structural expansion method for improving the performance of the PCM storage units.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Experimental comparison of latent thermal energy storage units with different metal macro-additives
    Wu, Jiani
    Wu, Zhiyong
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 216
  • [22] Performance enhancement of parabolic trough collector solar thermal power plants with thermal energy storage capability
    Praveen, R. P.
    Mouli, Kotturu V. V. Chandra
    AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2022, 13 (05)
  • [23] Experimental research on thermal characteristics of PCM thermal energy storage units
    Zhang, Tianshi
    Liu, Yubin
    Gao, Qing
    Wang, Guohua
    Yan, Zhenmin
    Shen, Ming
    JOURNAL OF THE ENERGY INSTITUTE, 2020, 93 (01) : 76 - 86
  • [24] Smart self-scheduling of Gencos with thermal and energy storage units under price uncertainty
    Soroudi, Alireza
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2014, 24 (10): : 1401 - 1418
  • [25] Thermal performance of packed bed thermal energy storage units using multiple granular phase change composites
    Rady, Mohamed
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2009, 86 (12) : 2704 - 2720
  • [26] Nanoparticles favorable effects on performance of thermal storage units
    Sheikholeslami, M.
    Keshteli, A. Nematpour
    Babazadeh, Houman
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS, 2020, 300 (300)
  • [27] Analysis of HTFs, PCMs and fins effects on the thermal performance of shell-tube thermal energy storage units
    Li, Zhuo
    Wu, Zhi-Gen
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2015, 122 : 382 - 395
  • [28] Performance enhancement of latent heat thermal energy storage by bubble-driven flow
    Choi, Sung Ho
    Sohn, Dong Kee
    Ko, Han Seo
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2021, 302
  • [29] Numerical simulation on the thermal performance enhancement of energy storage tank with phase change materials
    Tian, Yang
    Zhao, Ming
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 14 (02):
  • [30] A review of design considerations and performance enhancement techniques for thermocline thermal energy storage systems
    Zhang, Shi-guang
    Zhang, Hao
    Xi, Xin-ming
    Li, Bao-rang
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2025, 212