Gender differences in professional social responsibility: Are women more responsible at work than men?

被引:1
|
作者
Reig-Aleixandre, Natalia [1 ]
Garcia-Ramos, Jose Manuel [2 ]
De la Calle-Maldonado, Carmen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Francisco Vitoria, Dept Humanities, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense, Fac Educ, Madrid, Spain
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
social responsibility; gender differences; professional social responsibility; professional woman; social awareness;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1049389
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
IntroductionThere is overwhelming evidence that companies with women on their boards of directors have higher levels of Corporate Social Responsibility. The relation between professional women and collective or organisational responsibility has been widely studied. However, to date there has been little research into the individual attitudes of women towards social responsibility. The purpose of this study is to analyse the differences in attitudes towards social responsibility between men and women in their professional life. MethodsA study sample (N = 524; 347 women; M-edad = 37) was assembled using the LinkedIn social media platform and participants, after providing their informed consent, were asked to answer the Professional Social Responsibility Questionnaire. ResultsThe results showed significant differences in Professional Social Responsibility between men and women, with moderate effect (t((522)) = 2.078; p = 0.038; eta(2) = 0.191), in favour of women. The women participants scored higher in the dimensions Discovery of Personal Values (t((522)) = 2.342; p = 0.020; eta(2) = 0.216) and Social Awareness (t((522)) = 2.179; p = 0.030; eta(2) = 0.201), both with representative effect sizes. DiscussionThese results suggest that the greater commitment to Corporate Social Responsibility of companies with women on their boards of directors is due, in part, to the greater individual or personal social responsibility of women. Higher levels of Discovery of Personal Values and Social Awareness amongst women may also result in better decision-making, ultimately accruing to the benefit of the company in terms of its financial results and reputation.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Gender differences in beliefs of why women live longer than men
    Wallace, JE
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1996, 79 (02) : 587 - 591
  • [32] GENDER DIFFERENCES AT WORK - WOMEN AND MEN IN NONTRADITIONAL OCCUPATIONS - WILLIAMS,CL
    BLANKENSHIP, KM
    SIGNS, 1991, 16 (03): : 606 - 610
  • [34] GENDER DIFFERENCES AT WORK - WOMEN AND MEN IN NONTRADITIONAL OCCUPATIONS - WILLIAMS,CL
    WISE, ES
    ARMED FORCES & SOCIETY, 1990, 17 (01) : 153 - 155
  • [38] PROFESSIONAL-RESPONSIBILITY - MORE THAN JUST TREATMENT
    SCHWARTZ, HC
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1987, 45 (09) : 750 - 750
  • [39] Gender Differences in Body Evaluation: Do Men Show More Self-Serving Double Standards Than Women?
    Voges, Mona M.
    Giabbiconi, Claire-Marie
    Schoene, Benjamin
    Waldorf, Manuel
    Hartmann, Andrea S.
    Vocks, Silja
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [40] Are Women Really (Not) More Talkative Than Men? A Registered Report of Binary Gender Similarities/Differences in Daily Word Use
    Tidwell, Colin A.
    Danvers, Alexander F.
    Pfeifer, Valeria A.
    Abel, Danielle B.
    Alisic, Eva
    Beer, Andrew
    Bierstetel, Sabrina J.
    Bollich-Ziegler, Kathryn L.
    Bruni, Michelle
    Calabrese, William R.
    Chiarello, Christine
    Demiray, Burcu
    Dimidjian, Sona
    Fingerman, Karen L.
    Haas, Maximilian
    Kaplan, Deanna M.
    Kim, Yijung K.
    Knezevic, Goran
    Lazarevic, Ljiljana B.
    Luo, Minxia
    Macbeth, Alessandra
    Manson, Joseph H.
    Mascaro, Jennifer S.
    Metcalf, Christina
    Minor, Kyle S.
    Moseley, Suzanne
    Polsinelli, Angelina J.
    Raison, Charles L.
    Rilling, James K.
    Robbins, Megan L.
    Sbarra, David
    Slatcher, Richard B.
    Sun, Jessie
    Vasileva, Mira
    Vazire, Simine
    Mehl, Matthias R.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 128 (02) : 367 - 391