Quantification of run-of-river hydropower potential in the Upper Indus basin under climate change

被引:1
|
作者
Dhaubanjar, Sanita [1 ,2 ]
Lutz, Arthur F. [2 ]
Smolenaars, Wouter Julius [3 ]
Khanal, Sonu [4 ]
Jamil, Muhammad Khalid [3 ,5 ]
Biemans, Hester [3 ]
Ludwig, Fulco [3 ]
Shrestha, Arun Bhakta [1 ]
Immerzeel, Walter W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Int Ctr Integrated Mt Dev ICIMOD, Lalitpur, Nepal
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Phys Geog, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Wageningen Univ & Res, Environm Sci Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Future Water, Wageningen, Netherlands
[5] Pakistan Agr Res Council, Islamabad, Pakistan
来源
FRONTIERS IN WATER | 2023年 / 5卷
关键词
hydropower development; future hydropower potential; climate change; energy security; SDG; 7; energy justice; sustainable development; resource potential; CHANGE IMPACTS; CHANGE SCENARIOS; SOCIO-HYDROLOGY; LARGE DAMS; SYSTEM; MODEL; VULNERABILITY; ADAPTATION; CHALLENGES; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.3389/frwa.2023.1256249
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
IntroductionDespite ambitious plans to quadruple hydropower generation in the Indus basin, a quantitative assessment of the impact of climate change on hydropower availability in the basin is missing. To address this gap, we combine downscaled CMIP6 projections with the Hydropower Potential Exploration (HyPE) model to quantify future hydropower potential available in the upper Indus basin.MethodsHyPE uses a spatial cost-minimization framework to evaluate four classes of hydropower potential, namely theoretical, technical, financial and sustainable, considering various constraints on the siting and sizing of two run-of-river hydropower plant configurations.ResultsUnder future discharge projections, all classes of potential increase while subbasin changes align with the spatial patterns projected in hydro-climatology. Theoretical potential changes by 3.9-56 %, technical potential by -2.3-46.8 %, financial potential by -8.8-50.4 % and sustainable potential by -6.1-49.7 %. A small decline is observed in the northwestern subbasins where increase in potential is lower than in the southeast. In contrast, with increasing variability in the Indian Summer Monsoon in the future, the southeastern subbasins have the strongest increase in sustainable potential accompanied by higher increase in plant size, decrease in costs and higher variability. The southeastern Satluj subbasin is the hotspot where sustainable potential has the highest increase of up to 145 %. The northwestern Kabul subbasin has the highest decrease of up to -27 %. The Swat subbasin has the lowest variability in sustainable potential while the Jhelum and Indus main subbasins remain the subbasins with the cheapest potential into the future. The performance of future sustainable portfolios differ from the performance of historical portfolios by -11.1-39.9 %.DiscussionHence, considering future climate in the present-day planning of hydropower will lead to improved performance under a majority of scenarios. The sufficiency of hydropower potential to fulfill energy security depends on future population growth. Energy availability is projected to decline in the northwest as population increases faster than hydropower potential. The per capita sustainable potential In the Kabul subbasin reduces to a third of the historical value. A socio-hydrological approach is necessary to address the complexity of achieving sustainable and equitable hydropower development in the Indus basin under such spatial mismatch between hydropower availability and energy demand in a resource-limited world. A comparison of the HyPE model estimates of the technical, financial and sustainable hydropower potential in the upper Indus in the future with available projections for energy security requirements in the upper and the entire Indus.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Water governance and adaptation to climate change in the Indus River Basin
    Yang, Yi-Chen E.
    Brown, Casey
    Yu, Winston
    Wescoat, James, Jr.
    Ringler, Claudia
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2014, 519 : 2527 - 2537
  • [32] Design models for small run-of-river hydropower plants: a review
    Tsuanyo, David
    Amougou, Boris
    Aziz, Abdoul
    Nka Nnomo, Bernadette
    Fioriti, Davide
    Kenfack, Joseph
    Renewables: Wind, Water, and Solar, 2023, 10 (01)
  • [33] Future hydropower generation prediction of large-scale reservoirs in the upper Yangtze River basin under climate change
    Zhong, Wenjie
    Guo, Jing
    Chen, Lu
    Zhou, Jianzhong
    Zhang, Junhong
    Wang, Dangwei
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 588
  • [34] How run-of-river operation affects hydropower generation and value
    Jager, Henriette I.
    Bevelhimer, Mark S.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 40 (06) : 1004 - 1015
  • [35] The impacts of "run-of-river' hydropower on the physical and ecological condition of rivers
    Anderson, David
    Moggridge, Helen
    Warren, Philip
    Shucksmith, James
    WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 29 (02) : 268 - 276
  • [36] Streamflow variability and optimal capacity of run-of-river hydropower plants
    Basso, S.
    Botter, G.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2012, 48
  • [37] Research on flow in water intake of a run-of-river hydropower plant
    Balzannikov, Mikhail
    RSP 2017 - XXVI R-S-P SEMINAR 2017 THEORETICAL FOUNDATION OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2017, 117
  • [38] Technical performance evaluation and optimization of a run-of-river hydropower facility
    Nedaei, Mojtaba
    Walsh, Philip R.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 182 : 343 - 362
  • [39] How Run-of-River Operation Affects Hydropower Generation and Value
    Henriette I. Jager
    Mark S. Bevelhimer
    Environmental Management, 2007, 40 : 1004 - 1015
  • [40] Impact of Climate Change on Combined Solar and Run-of-River Power in Northern Italy
    Francois, Baptiste
    Hingray, Benoit
    Borga, Marco
    Zoccatelli, Davide
    Brown, Casey
    Creutin, Jean-Dominique
    ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (02)