Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using King Vision (Non-channeled Blade) and Tuoren Video Laryngoscopes in Patients With Cervical Spine Immobilization by Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:1
|
作者
Ramesh, Killo [1 ]
Srinivasan, Gnanasekaran [1 ]
Bidkar, Prasanna U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Jawaharlal Inst Postgrad Med Educ & Res, Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Pondicherry, India
关键词
intubation difficulty score; intubation time; glottic visualization; mils; video laryngoscope; MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPES; CHANNELED BLADE; AIRWAY; VISUALIZATION; PERCENTAGE; SCORE;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.43471
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Glottic visualization on cervical immobilization with manual in-line stabilization (MILS) might be challenging in individuals with cervical spine injuries. We compared non-channeled King Vision video laryngoscope (VL) (Ambu GmbH, Bad Nauheim, Germany) with Tuoren video laryngoscope (Henan Tuoren Medical Device, Zhengzhou, China) for endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Methods: A total of 124 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were included in this study. After induction of general anesthesia, patients were randomized into two groups (62 each): group K (non-channeled blade of King Vision video laryngoscope) and group T (Tuoren video laryngoscope). Cervical spine immobilization was achieved with manual in-line stabilization. The success of the first pass intubation, the time required to intubate, glottic visualization, and intubation difficulty score (IDS) were recorded. Results: The first-attempt success rate of intubation was 95.2% (59 out of 62 patients) in group K and 90.3% (56 out of 62 patients) in group T, which were comparable. The mean glottic visualization time was significantly less with group T (12.74 & PLUSMN; 6.32 seconds) compared to group K (17.92 & PLUSMN; 4.24 seconds). Intubation time was significantly faster with group K (18.79 & PLUSMN; 5.857 seconds) compared to group T (27.21 & PLUSMN; 8.514 seconds). Both video laryngoscopes provided good grades of glottic visualization. Conclusions: We conclude that the performance of the Tuoren video laryngoscope is similar to the King Vision video laryngoscope in terms of first-attempt intubation success rate and glottic visualization score in patients with cervical spine immobilization by manual in-line stabilization. Although glottic visualization time was shorter with Tuoren VL, we could achieve faster intubation with King Vision VL.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] Comparison of the McGrath videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double lumen endobronchial tube intubation in patients with manual in-line stabilization: A randomized controlled trial
    Yoo, Ji Young
    Park, Sung Yong
    Kim, Jong Yeop
    Kim, Myungseob
    Haam, Seok Jin
    Kim, Dae Hee
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (10)
  • [22] A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing tracheal intubation plus manual in-line stabilisation of the cervical spine using the Macintosh laryngoscope vs the McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope
    Ilyas, S.
    Symons, J.
    Bradley, W. P. L.
    Segal, R.
    Taylor, H.
    Lee, K.
    Balkin, M.
    Bain, C.
    Ng, I.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 69 (12) : 1345 - 1350
  • [23] Comparison of laryngeal mask airway CTrach (TM) and Airtraq (R) videolaryngoscopes as conduits for endotracheal intubation in patients with simulated limitation of cervical spine movements by manual in-line stabilization
    Rao, Madhu
    Budania, Lokvendra S.
    Chamala, Vamsidhar
    Goyal, Kush
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 34 (02) : 188 - 192
  • [24] Comparison of BlockBuster® Laryngeal Mask Airway, King Vision® Video Laryngoscope, and flexible intubation scope for orotracheal intubation in adult patients with simulated immobilised cervical spine: A randomised controlled trial
    Sinha, Neha
    Bhat, Kharat
    Khanuja, Samiksha
    Gupta, Mahima
    Wadhwani, Megha
    Panjiar, Pratibha
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2025, 69 (03) : 296 - 301
  • [25] Comparison of the paediatric blade of the Pentax-AWS and Ovassapian airway in fibreoptic tracheal intubation in patients with limited mouth opening and cervical spine immobilization by a semi-rigid neck collar: a randomized controlled trial
    Kim, D. H.
    Yoo, J. Y.
    Ha, S. Y.
    Chae, Y. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 119 (05) : 993 - 999