Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using King Vision (Non-channeled Blade) and Tuoren Video Laryngoscopes in Patients With Cervical Spine Immobilization by Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:1
|
作者
Ramesh, Killo [1 ]
Srinivasan, Gnanasekaran [1 ]
Bidkar, Prasanna U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Jawaharlal Inst Postgrad Med Educ & Res, Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Pondicherry, India
关键词
intubation difficulty score; intubation time; glottic visualization; mils; video laryngoscope; MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPES; CHANNELED BLADE; AIRWAY; VISUALIZATION; PERCENTAGE; SCORE;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.43471
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Glottic visualization on cervical immobilization with manual in-line stabilization (MILS) might be challenging in individuals with cervical spine injuries. We compared non-channeled King Vision video laryngoscope (VL) (Ambu GmbH, Bad Nauheim, Germany) with Tuoren video laryngoscope (Henan Tuoren Medical Device, Zhengzhou, China) for endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Methods: A total of 124 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were included in this study. After induction of general anesthesia, patients were randomized into two groups (62 each): group K (non-channeled blade of King Vision video laryngoscope) and group T (Tuoren video laryngoscope). Cervical spine immobilization was achieved with manual in-line stabilization. The success of the first pass intubation, the time required to intubate, glottic visualization, and intubation difficulty score (IDS) were recorded. Results: The first-attempt success rate of intubation was 95.2% (59 out of 62 patients) in group K and 90.3% (56 out of 62 patients) in group T, which were comparable. The mean glottic visualization time was significantly less with group T (12.74 & PLUSMN; 6.32 seconds) compared to group K (17.92 & PLUSMN; 4.24 seconds). Intubation time was significantly faster with group K (18.79 & PLUSMN; 5.857 seconds) compared to group T (27.21 & PLUSMN; 8.514 seconds). Both video laryngoscopes provided good grades of glottic visualization. Conclusions: We conclude that the performance of the Tuoren video laryngoscope is similar to the King Vision video laryngoscope in terms of first-attempt intubation success rate and glottic visualization score in patients with cervical spine immobilization by manual in-line stabilization. Although glottic visualization time was shorter with Tuoren VL, we could achieve faster intubation with King Vision VL.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Using King Vision video laryngoscope with a channeled blade prolongs time for tracheal intubation in different training levels, compared to non-channeled blade
    Kriege, Marc
    Alflen, Christian
    Noppens, Ruediger R.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (08):
  • [2] Video Laryngoscopic Intubation Using the King Vision™ Laryngoscope in a Simulated Cervical Spine Trauma: A Comparison Between Non-Channeled and Channeled Disposable Blades
    Votruba, Jiri
    Brozek, Tomas
    Blaha, Jan
    Henlin, Tomas
    Vymazal, Tomas
    Donaldson, Will
    Michalek, Pavel
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (03)
  • [3] A randomized clinical trial comparing the King Vision (channeled blade) and the CMAC (D blade) videolaryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization
    Chandy, Jacob
    Pillai, Rahul
    Mathew, Amit
    Philip, Amitav V.
    George, Sajan P.
    Sahajanandan, Raj
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 37 (04) : 604 - 609
  • [4] Comparison of C-MAC® conventional blade, D-Blade™, and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in patients with simulated immobilization using manual in-line stabilization: A randomized trial
    Dabas, M.
    Gupta, M.
    Mohanan, S.
    Kaushik, P.
    Lall, R.
    JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2024, 70 (03) : 149 - 153
  • [5] A Comparison of Macintosh and Airtraq Laryngoscopes for Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients With Cervical Spine Immobilization Using Manual In Line Axial Stabilization: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Vijayakumar, Vinodhadevi
    Rao, Shwethapriya
    Shetty, Nanda
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 28 (04) : 296 - 302
  • [6] Randomized comparison trial among I-gel™, LMA-ProSeal™, and tracheal intubation with manual in-line stabilization in simulated cervical spine-injured patients with rigid cervical collar immobilization
    Engsusophon, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 116 (06) : E904 - E905
  • [7] Comparison of King Vision video laryngoscope (channeled blade) with Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation using armored endotracheal tubes
    Reena
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 35 (03) : 359 - 362
  • [8] A comparative evaluation of Airtraq and Hansraj Video laryngoscopes in patients undergoing tracheal intubation with cervical spine immobilization - A randomized prospective study
    Varshney, Poojangi
    Ahmed, Syed M.
    Siddiqui, Obaid A.
    Abu Nadeem
    Ajmal, P. M.
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 37 (03) : 336 - 341
  • [9] A randomized controlled comparison of non-channeled king vision, McGrath MAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with predicted difficult intubations
    Zhu, Haozhen
    Liu, Jinxing
    Suo, Lulu
    Zhou, Chi
    Sun, Yu
    Jiang, Hong
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [10] A randomized controlled comparison of non-channeled king vision, McGrath MAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with predicted difficult intubations
    Haozhen Zhu
    Jinxing Liu
    Lulu Suo
    Chi Zhou
    Yu Sun
    Hong Jiang
    BMC Anesthesiology, 19